You won’t believe which Republican Governor just betrayed Christians with a horrific announcement

61

While Republicans love to court Christian voters, they will often betray their values once in office.

Time and time again “Christian” Republicans do just that.

And you won’t believe which Republican Governor just betrayed Christians with a horrific announcement.

After signing a pro-life bill that bans abortions when a baby’s heart begins beating, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp was touted as a pro-life hero.

But in a shocking twist, he just announced that he will be filling a U.S. Senate vacancy with a Planned Parenthood activist.

Despite opposition from pro-life leaders, Kemp is appointing Kelly Loeffler to replace U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson.

Loeffler is on the board of Grady Memorial Hospital, which is one of the largest abortion providers in the state of Georgia, along with being a training ground for abortionists.

LifeNews reports:

Loeffler has never served in public office before, and her only political qualifications seem to be millions of dollars in political donations she has made.

There are many solid choices for pro-life Americans that could take this seat, like Rep. Doug Collins, who President Trump reportedly has pushed to fill the vacancy.

Instead, an untested figure, who has ties to the abortion industry will take the position.

Would you vote against any candidate who isn’t completely pro-life?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

61 COMMENTS

  1. Loading...
  2. Shame on Governor Kemp. This smacks of where the money lies. How can a pro-life governor make a choice such as this, especially with a person who has no politic experience. I guess money talks.

  3. Article didn’t say when she would be up for election –
    SO; VOTE HER OUT!
    It would seem there are enough pro-life votes to elect a
    good conservative to replace her.
    Meantime………………..recall?

  4. This governor is sick. And he is a RINO. Sadly, he is just one more reason why I stopped supporting the Rep. Party many years ago.

  5. Thank you Eleanor and Robert for your comments! IF she stands with Planned Parenthood, then she, and Governor Kemp WILL be held accountable both in this lifetime and in the next!!!

  6. How to Debate Liberals on Abortion:

    John Morrow, a pro-life Christian taking a stand against abortion on secular human rights grounds, converted me to the pro-life cause, when he was debating pro-choice liberals (dominating the discussion!) on USENET, from 1986 – 1988.

    Prior, I was under the impression that abortion was solely a “religious” issue, and we shouldn’t impose our “religious beliefs” upon others.

    The sad irony is many pro-lifers see animal rights not as social and moral progress for all mankind, but as someone else’s “religious belief” which they think doesn’t apply to them. A lot of people look at abortion that way, too, you know!

    1. John Morrow said he disagreed with the Republicans for failing to provide enough social support for children once they’re born.

    In 1992, pro-life Democrat Robert Casey said he would strongly support Lynn Yeakel who was then running against pro-choice Republican Senator Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania.

    Yeakel favored abortion-rights, too, but, Casey said, “we agree on all the other issues.”

    Casey stated further that he would not leave the Democratic Party. The anti-abortion Republicans, he insisted, “drop the children at birth and do nothing for them after that.”

    Barney Frank similarly commented that for Republicans, “Life begins at conception and ends at birth.”

    2. John Morrow said his opposition to capital punishment led him to oppose abortion.

    3. John Morrow compared discrimination against the unborn to homophobia and xenophobia when debating pro-choice liberals.

    4. John Morrow said he supported sex education.

    5. John Morrow said he supported contraception.

    6. John Morrow said when Roe v. Wade came down, a different set of morals was in place: even mainstream secular American society would not accept single mothers, there were “shotgun weddings,” homes for unwed mothers, etc.

    When the Mary Tyler Moore show premiered in 1970, they decided against making her character a *divorced* woman, thinking Americans weren’t ready for it!

    7. And John Morrow said health care in the U.S. should be “federalized” i.e., “socialized, like it is in the UK.”

    We Democrats have been pushing for health care reform since Harry Truman.

    (When I repeat John Morrow’s arguments, the right wing attacks me.)

    Kristen Day of Democrats For Life said in 2014: “Roughly a third of the Democratic Party is pro-life. And while many do not call themselves liberal, they share the values which seem to identify with liberalism, particularly a commitment to helping the vulnerable and providing a social safety net.”

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

  7. You’d think the unborn-right-to-lifers would immediately understand the animal-right-to-lifers! The case for animal rights should be readily understandable to the millions of Americans opposed to abortion on demand.

    “Although I may disagree with some of its underlying principles,” writes pro-life Democrat Karen Swallow Prior, “there is much for me, an anti-abortion activist, to respect in the animal rights movement. Animal rights activists, like me, have risked personal safety and reputation for the sake of other living beings. Animal rights activists, like me, are viewed by many in the mainstream as fanatical wackos, ironically exhorted by irritated passerby to ‘Get a Life!’ Animal rights activists, like me, place a higher value on life than on personal comfort and convenience, and in balancing the sometimes competing interests of rights and responsibilities, choose to err on the side of compassion and nonviolence.”

    The animal rights movement, representing a cross-section of mainstream secular American society, is NOT “officially pro-choice,” but IS divided on abortion. In a 1992 interview on Dennis Prager’s conservative talk show, when specifically asked about the animal rights position on abortion, Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), admitted, “We’re divided.”

    Former television game show host Bob Barker is a conservative Republican and an animal activist. Tony LaRussa of the Animal Rescue Foundation is a political conservative. Vegan labor leader Cesar Chavez was pro-life. Vegan civil rights leader Dick Gregory was pro-life. Former Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy, a devout pacifist, has expressed opposition to abortion, and in the 1980s was critical of Reverend Jesse Jackson for having changed sides on the issue.

    Dixie Mahy, past president of the San Francisco Vegetarian Society, has been vegetarian for sixty years, vegan for forty of those sixty years, and identifies herself as pro-life-and-pro-animal Matthew Scully, a conservative Catholic and former speechwriter for George W. Bush identifies himself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.” Catholic Concern for Animals is pro-life-and-pro-animal. Reverend Frank Hoffman’s http://www.all-creatures.org Christian vegan website is pro-life-and-pro-animal Compassion for animals is a fundamental tenet of the Baha’i faith, which endorses vegetarianism, says abortion is more a matter of individual conscience, but concludes, without taking a position on abortion, life should not be destroyed.

    John Stuart Mill wrote: “The reasons for legal intervention in favor of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves — the animals.”

    Animals are like children. Henry Bergh, founder of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), successfully prosecuted a woman for child abuse in 1873, at a time when children had no legal protection, under the then currently existing animal protection statutes. This case started the child-saving crusade around the world.

    In Christianity and the Rights of Animals, the Reverend Dr. Andrew Linzey writes: “In some ways, Christian thinking is already oriented in this direction. What is it that so appalls us about cruelty to children or oppression of the vulnerable, but that these things are betrayals of relationships of special care and special trust? Likewise, and even more so, in the case of animals who are mostly defenseless before us.”

    When told the animal rights movement is divided on abortion, Serrin Foster, Executive Director of Feminists For Life, said understandingly, “The Children’s Defense Fund is also divided on abortion.” Feminists For Life has many vegetarians and vegans. Serrin identifies herself as a vegetarian.

    From 1992 through 2003, James Dawson, raised Catholic and now a Buddhist, published Live and Let Live, a pro-life / animal rights / libertarian ‘zine. The ancient eastern reincarnationist religions Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism all predate Christianity, all oppose abortion, all teach ahimsa, or nonviolence towards humans and animals alike to the point of vegetarianism, all are vegan-friendly, and all teach that abortion and war are the karma for killing animals, and that therefore, we cannot end abortion nor bring about world peace until first we abolish the killing of animals.

    This knowledge, however, does not rest with everyone. Not all pro-life-and-pro-animal people advocate the reincarnationist strategy for ending abortion and bringing about world peace. Shay Van Vlieman, founder of Vegans For Life in the late ’90s, said she doesn’t expect to see a vegan president in her lifetime: she would just be glad to elect a president who will work to overturn Roe v. Wade. And she insists she is not a Republican, but a libertarian!

    During the late 1990s, Rachel MacNair, a Quaker pacifist, feminist, vegan, past president of Feminists For Life, moderated an email list for pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans. Rachel is now a psychology professor, and has written several books on nonviolence. In 1998, the Animals Agenda ran a cover story on the debate within the animal rights movement over abortion. Vegan congressman Dennis Kucinich (D – Ohio), one of the most liberal members of Congress, was pro-life throughout most of his political career.

    Pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans are found within the “consistent-ethic” movement: pro-lifers opposed to capital punishment. A significant number of “consistent-ethic” Christians were / are vegetarian or vegan: Rose Evans, Ruth Enero, Rachel MacNair, Albert Fecko, Carol Crossed, Bill Samuel, Mary Krane Derr, Mary Rider, Father John Dear, etc.

    Mary Rider, a practicing Catholic, wrote in Harmony: Voices for a Just Future, a “consistent-ethic” periodical in 2002:

    “So we teach our children to walk softly on the earth and to embrace nonviolence as the only legitimate means of conflict resolution, on both a personal and a global level. We are aware of the excessive, privileged life we lead as educated, first world U.S. citizens and of the responsibilities to which our privilege calls us. We try to live simply. We eat low on the food chain. We try to buy nothing new… We try to respect all life and carry that message forward in all we do… Because we value people and relationships over things… First world consumption kills people around the world… Pollution, environmental devastation, corrupt governments, war, sweatshops… all are a are a result of our desire to buy more at a lower price… We believe each person has a right to live a valued and respected life free from hunger and discrimination…”

    The threat of overpopulation is frequently used to justify abortion as birth control. On a vegan diet, however, the world could easily support a human population several times its present size. The world’s cattle alone consume enough to feed over 8.7 billion humans. Even if abortion advocates argue shifting to a plant-based diet, a vegan diet, isn’t enough to stave off overpopulation, in light of the data showing the depletion of energy, food, fresh water, land space, raw materials and resources as well as the heavy contribution to air and water pollution, deforestization, and global warming caused by a meat-centered diet, how do abortion advocates — warning about overpopulation consuming the world’s resources — justify consuming animal products?

    If vegetarianism were merely about “fit” or following a peculiar set of “dietary laws” why are pro-lifers offended by pro-choice vegetarians and pro-choice vegans? Clearly, they’re offended because they know vegetarianism involves the animals’ right to life, and thus these pro-choicers appear to value animal life over human life under some circumstances. And issues like animal experimentation, circuses, and fur have nothing to do with diet, eating, nor food, but do involve the animals’ right to life. Leonardo Da Vinci, Count Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas Gandhi, George Bernard Shaw, Susan B. Anthony, Percy Shelley, Rosa Parks, etc. were all vegetarian, and none of them were Jewish nor Muslim.

    For Love of Animals: Christian Ethics, Consistent Action offers an introduction to animal rights ethics within Christianity alongside directly related sanctity-of-life issues, like the possible rights of unborn children. The book’s foreword is written by Mary Eberstadt, senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC, a Catholic who identifies herself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.”

    Author Charles Camosy responds to criticisms from academicians Peter Singer and Lynn White, Jr., that the misinterpretation of “human dominion” (versus compassionate stewardship) is responsible for the current ecological crisis. Camosy indicates that Christianity cannot be blamed if humans with their imperfections distort their own religious teachings, that Christianity did not give rise to the industrial revolution, and that real Christianity — as it was meant to be practiced — is at odds with market-driven ethics and mass consumerism (a point made decades ago by liberal Protestant theologian Dr. Harvey Cox). Camosy concludes: “I became convinced that, if I wanted to be authentically and consistently pro-life, I should give up eating meat.” Dozens of books have been written on Christianity and animal rights. Camosy merely provides an overview of animal ethics in Christianity.

    Steve Kaufman, head of the Christian Vegetarian Association, was raised Jewish, and is now serving in the United Church of Christ, America’s largest pro-choice Protestant denomination. Steve expressed interest in Democrats For Life, his only reservation was whether Democrats For Life favors criminalizing abortion. Some animal advocates and activists (like Catholic vegan columnist Colman McCarthy) oppose abortion, but don’t think criminalization is the answer.

    In 2004, on the Democrats For Life email list, Maria Krasinski mentioned a poll which found animal activists evenly divided on abortion. This either indicates animal rights really are a bipartisan cause which conservatives can support alongside liberals, or it indicates many liberals are uncomfortable with abortion!

    In 2014, Kristen Day of Democrats For Life said: “Roughly a third of the Democratic Party is pro-life. And while many do not call themselves liberal, they share the values which seem to identify with liberalism, particularly a commitment to helping the vulnerable and providing a social safety net.”

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

  8. We know what liberals believe and they are ALL wrong!!! That is why i left the party after 43 years and registered INDEPENDENT!! The sneaky Republicans are backstabbers and liars . THAT IS WHY” SHOCK” I AM FOR TRUMP NOT A REPUBLICAN BUT A GREAT INDEPENDENT WITH BAGGAGE JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, BUT WITH GREAT IDEAS FOR AMERICA, America first is what it is all about!!!!!!

  9. “All Those Who Hate Me (YAHWEH), Love Death.” Proverbs 8:36 “Before I (YAHWEH) Formed You in the Womb, I knew You.” Jeremiah 1:5 “I (YAHWEH) Call Heaven and Earth this Day Against You, that I have set Before You Life and Death, Blessing and Cursing, Therefore Choose LIFE, so that You and Your Children May Live.” Deuteronomy 30:19

  10. You said in your 3rd paragraph “ The animal rights movement, representing a cross-section of mainstream secular American society, is NOT “officially pro-choice,” but IS divided on abortion.” For the life of me, as a person who is passionate about the rights of ALL (human and animal) to life, I cannot understand how anyone can believe it’s wrong to harm an innocent animal but painfully tear apart an innocent baby in the womb.

  11. The END may be in sight…..when you see former supposedly CHRISTIAN people starting to be influenced by the NON CHRISTIAN believers (all liberal’s supporting NON CHRISTIAN VALUES) then it may be TIME…If so then let it be….at least CHRISTIANS have a place to go that is far better than the liberal mess we are in now…

  12. So what’s the surprise? Democrats stand right in your face screaming their agenda at you and marching down the streets touting it and threatening anyone who doesn’t abide by it. You always KNOW what they’re thinking.

    Republicans, on the other hand, slink through the darkness behind your back whispering their support for you on election day then spring from ambush. They plunge that long stiletto into your back when the time is right – for the Democrats.

    They’ve been doing it for years now! Remember their promises to repeal the PPACA? Well? We’re still waiting. Their one-time Presidential candidate sank us all on that! You remember him, don’t you? The guy who killed a lot of US sailors and did hundreds of millions of dollars damage to the US Navy then collaborated with the enemy during war time. Yes, THAT Republican.

    Remember their loud promises to investigate and end voter fraud? Well? We’re still waiting. The Democrats are still busily loading the eligible voter rolls with illegals, motor voters and the dead. The GOP’s attitude? Meh.

    Now things like this. They’re against abortion. Right? Except when it suits the Democrats.

    I hate Democrat politics. On the other hand, I LOATHE the cowardly GOP for lying right to our faces then turning coat and going over to the enemy. This is just another example of their lying duplicity!

  13. I guess it’s safe to call her a baby murdering monster. All Nazi officials were guilty in their knowledge and compliance with the “final solution” as are all employees and supporters of Planned Parenthood in the deaths of millions of unborn children!

  14. That just goes to show that Kemp is really not pro-life and should be voted out also. He is pulling a John McCain moment to get the Republican vote. can not be trusted. He is really a democrat.

  15. It’s hard to believe that we have so many HYPOCITES and LIARS in office now . . . This doesn’t include the TREASONISTIC TRAITORS that need to be LOCKED UP. – TEAM Trump and his allies 2020 – KAGA (Keep America Great Again).

  16. As if it makes a difference…LMAO Christians don’t vote! Most of them play hooky on Voter Day. Only about 25% of them vote. HAAAAAAAAAAAA Check the statistics if you don’t believe me. 20 million Christians arent even registerd to vote so don’t worry about it… This is a non-story.

  17. I must also exclude most Republicans and conservatives from being honestly opposed to abortion as a result of such welfare reforms as the family cap (a provision where a woman’s welfare payments are not increased for another child), and their TOTAL REFUSAL to just fix the pro-abortion parts of Obamacare while otherwise leaving alone its Medicaid expansion and protections for pre-existing conditions. Rolling back the Medicaid expansion in Obamacare or its protections for pre-existing conditions without an adequate substitute is PRO-EUTHANASIA. It is a total mystery to me why such welfare reforms as the family cap are not recognized to be PRO-ABORTION; working families have child tax credits, although the tax reform passed in December 2017 abolished the dependency exemption, at least at the federal level. Most probably, the family cap disqualifies the vast majority of Republicans and conservatives from being honestly opposed to abortion.

    More generally, any penalties for pregnancy and childbirth of any kind and for any reason, regardless of whether or not the mother is married, are PRO-ABORTION. In other words, any attempts whatsoever to punish, shame, or stigmatize out-of-wedlock pregnancies and childbirths are PRO-ABORTION, plain and simple. Although it is wrong for those who are unmarried to be sexually active (including ALL homosexual and lesbian sexual activity of ANY kind, regardless of one’s “marital” status), it is much more important to protect the innocent baby after conception has occurred. In other words, once the baby is conceived, protecting the innocent baby from abortion MUST come first, regardless of whether or not the mother is married. I believe that a majority of women who have abortions are unmarried.

    Also, any complaining about out-of-wedlock pregnancies and childbirths, or the taxpayer cost of providing for the children of single mothers (welfare or otherwise) and for anchor babies, or any children for that matter, is PRO-ABORTION. More generally, any complaining about people having children they cannot afford, or the taxpayer cost of raising people’s children is PRO-ABORTION. Besides, some of these women might have been raped or sexually exploited. The #MeToo campaign indicates that such sexual assault is much more common than we may have thought. (Donald J. Trump’s endorsement of sexual assault on women is an implicit endorsement of abortion for babies who might be conceived as a result of such sexual assault, even if some other things he is doing may be pro-life.)

    Those who wish to curtail unmarried sexual activity will have to try to do so BEFORE conception occurs. For example, why not teach people proper sexual morality BEFORE the baby is conceived, including teaching men not to rape or sexually exploit women? Of course, that will not be enough for women who are raped or sexually exploited, but punishing or stigmatizing them after they get pregnant, or after they give birth is not helpful either. In addition, my Catholic faith ABSOLUTELY RULES OUT endorsing or approving of any kind of contraceptive solution here (except possibly after rape). In addition, some so-called contraceptives may actually have abortifacient consequences. Anyone honestly opposed to abortion would at least have to object to potentially abortifacient contraceptives.

    I must also consider any complaining about health insurance covering pregnancy and maternity and baby care, delays in extending the CHIP health insurance program or attempts to cut the CHIP health insurance program to be PRO-ABORTION. In addition, I must consider Donald Trump’s public charge restrictions which initially attempted to prohibit immigrants who ever used government programs to help them raise their children or otherwise provide for their families from qualifying for visas, green cards, or US citizenship to be both PRO-ABORTION and PRO-EUTHANASIA. More generally, any attempt whatsoever to try to punish people for having babies, or for making use of government programs intended to help parents to raise their children or otherwise provide for their families is both PRO-ABORTION and PRO-EUTHANASIA. Again, working families have child tax credits, although the tax reform passed in December 2017 abolished the dependency exemption, at least at the federal level.

    Honestly opposing abortion ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES a willingness to put up with more out-of-wedlock pregnancies and childbirths in return for fewer abortions; ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES a willingness to put up with immigrant families and others using government programs to help them raise their children; ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES a willingness to put up with the taxpayer cost of providing for the children of single mothers (welfare or otherwise) and for anchor babies, or any children for that matter (working families have child tax credits, although the tax reform that passed in December 2017 abolished the dependency exemption, at least at the federal level); ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES a willingness to accept the existence of health insurance covering pregnancy and maternity and baby care; and ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES opposition to any so-called contraceptives that can have abortifacient consequences.

    Finally, voter suppression MUST STOP. Basic voting rights should NOT be a partisan issue; it is basic democracy. Also, at least in urban and suburban areas, access to one’s polling place should NOT require a car; it OUGHT to be possible to WALK to one’s polling place, at least for those who are able to walk. I have always been able to walk to my polling place. Admittedly, it might not always be practical to be able to walk to one’s polling place in rural areas. Successfully stopping abortion and same-sex marriage also requires changing people’s hearts. If it is necessary to suppress votes in order to win on those moral issues, it necessarily follows that the necessary changes of people’s hearts have not occurred.

    For the same reasons in addition to basic voting rights, Washington DC OUGHT to have full voting representation in Congress. However, we ought to at least be open to alternative means of giving DC that voting representation, such as giving the land back to Maryland. If the land is given back to Maryland, DC would then be represented by Maryland’s senators in the US Senate. It is a total mystery to me why giving the land back to Maryland has not received more consideration. Common sense would suggest that returning the land to Maryland should have a much better chance of passing, especially if a constitutional amendment is needed. At the very least, a constitutional amendment would be needed to modify the 23rd amendment, which gives DC residents a vote for President.

  18. Not only would I not vote for her but because of this I will not vote for Kemp for governor again. This will make him a one term governor and I will be part of that process. I will also vote for any person running against her in the next election.

  19. Governor Brian Kemp He’s a realist and he wants to be re-elected and he knows like I know that the majority of the American population abortion isn’t going anywhere it’s only the Jesus freaks that seem to have an issue with this topic and if you don’t want abortions to be performed then support sex education in every school starting in the fourth grade

  20. VOTE THIS RINO OUT OF OFFICE! Shame on kemp for selling out to the highest bidder. Does he have a personal relationship with this woman? You are either Pro-Life all the way or you are NOT Pro-Life. It’s like the old saying, you can’t be a little bit pregnant.

  21. BRAIN DEAD ZOMIBE MORON. Crawl back into your cave of ignorance, hatred and evil and stop spewing your garbage. Abortion is murder and murder is against God’s laws and man’s laws.

  22. Governor Kemp is not a RINO. But he is wrong on this…. Hopefully he will rethink it before he makes a big mistake. We worked hard in Georgia to elect him as our Governor. I SUPPORT the REPUBLICAN Party.. Tell me what the alternative is???? Right.

  23. But then you will have the big mouthed woman that ran against him win with her support from Obama and Oprah… We really need to save Georgia… We need to write to Kemp and tell him how it is. This is a big mistake on his part that he needs to correct ASAP.

  24. Paul D. Whitehead :
    We opposed our Governor’s appointment of Kelly Loeffler to the U.S. Senate, to follow the retirement of Johnny Isakson. We were wishing to have Rep. Doug Collins appointed, both for his positions on issues and for his superlative stand against the kangaroo court now occurring in the U.S. Senate. We lost. Now we have sent notice to Governor Kemp that we SHALL BE WATCHING what Ms. Loeffler does, from this point forward. Her membership on the board at Grady Hospital does confer upon her the OPPORTUNITY to oppose abortions in that facility. However, she is only ONE of the members of that board of directors. We shall be observing and speaking about whatever Senator Loeffler does with her opportunities, until November 2020, when we shall be VOTING on whether she gets to stay in that office. We already expect a vigorous challenge to her at that time from our Representative Doug Collins. Time will tell “her true colors,” by whatever record she builds !!!
    Tom and Lovette Streets
    Johns Creek GA

  25. To Paul D. Whitehead, and others :
    Incidentally, standing in opposition to immorality of one sort (such as sexual perversions of every kind) DOES NOT equate to support of immorality of another kind (such as killing the innocent new lives of children who were started by people who find a pregnancy to be inconvenient !!!)
    Tom and Lovette Streets

  26. We don’t raise children to EAT them. We don’t normally give animals abortions. If every human was vegan, we would strip the earth of all the food that herbivores eat and they would starve. Culling herds of animals is what keeps nature in balance…otherwise there is overpopulation and, again, animals starve. How is this ridiculous diatribe sensible in any way?

  27. Their are 5 or 6 Democrats plants on the republican party.The republicans as a whole are ok. I fault the dems because many of them do not believe in the progressives agenda but they cave and vote with the rest.

  28. I am definitely in your camp Cathy.There are laws about abusing animals and children.In their infinite wisdom pro aborts use the freedom of choice as an excuse to not be inconvenienced by the birth of a child that they created.
    Another words they do not want to be responsible for their actions.We are actually not a progressive culture rather we are a regressive one. Crimes like these were being committed when Jesus was born, hense the 10 commandments. They are caught up in Satans web of lies and blind to the truth. We need to pray for world enlightenment so hearts can be changed.

  29. Why do you people let this Mentally Ill, MK ULTRA MIND CONTROLLED PUPPET, VASU MURTI bother you? Negative attention is better than NO ATTENTION. Stop letting this IDIOT rent space in your head!

  30. RECALLLLLLLL RECALLLLLLLL RECALLLLLLLLL ## DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS YOU DUMB AMERICAN FIX THE PROBLEM WITH RECALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL ???????????????????????????????????????????????????

  31. There is the Constitution Party, founded in 1992. That party is an all-conservative party. No liberals, moderates, or far-left people need apply. It is a pro-God, pro-life, pro-Second Amendment party.

  32. I love it! Even the right-wing person who wrote this article has to admit:
    “While Republicans love to court Christian voters, they will often betray their values once in office.”

    Right now most of them are betraying not only you tax-payers but espousing ridiculous theories, but also the Constitution

    Make sure you follow blindly behind them, children!

  33. There is nothing in his Vasu’s message that leads one to suspect that he has ANYTHING TO DO with “hatred and evil”, Jane.
    I think that must be something in YOUR mind!

  34. Really ? Whatever provoked you to write this book of nothings ! Those who have understand,well, what ev ! It’s useless !

  35. Don’t let Vasu bother you. His stuff isn’t even bathroom worthy – you’re liable to fall asleep on the john reading his never-ending screeds.
    Just do what most of us do – scroll down quickly and don’t waste time reading his blather.

  36. Hmm rethink voting for the murderess of Benghazi and millions of children or a proven women abusing pedophiler? Nope not denying God to have voted either one. The whole field this last time were full of sorry losers. Not a Christian among them. To not vote evil is not a waste ever.

  37. Not a Christian among them? I agree if you are referring to the Democrats!
    Our President however, has shown on every issue that he is a Christian, American patriot.
    He backs pro-lifers
    His choice for VP is a devout Christian
    His choice for the Supreme Court is Christian
    YOU DON’T HAVE TO VOTE FOR EVIL A OR B. THERE IS A CLEAR CHOICE.
    USE IT!

  38. Maybe he can have tea with my RINO governor, Peoples Republic of Massachusetts Charlie Baker. I wish these RINO’s would just change parties instead of concealing their true beliefs from the voters!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here