Trump just slapped Planned Parenthood with the worst news they’ve ever received

112

The number one cause of death in the world last year was abortion.

And the largest provider of abortion in America is Planned Parenthood.

That’s why Trump just smacked Planned Parenthood with the worst news they’ve ever received.

Despite having the Roe v. Wade decision keeping abortion legal, the Left wants to go further.

But the Left wants to go further with the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).

The ERA is claimed to “ensure equality for women,” but in reality would be used by abortion activists to remove all abortion restrictions up until the point of birth.

But Trump’s Justice Department just shot down their goal of passing the ERA by explaining they passed the deadline to ratify it.

LifeNews reports:

A pro-abortion amendment to the U.S. Constitution cannot move forward, despite abortion activists’ attempts to revive it past the deadline, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) technically would ensure equality for women through the U.S. Constitution. However, pro-life leaders long have warned that it would be used to end all abortion restrictions and allow unborn babies to be aborted for any reason up to birth.

U.S. Congress set a seven-year deadline for the ratification of the amendment, but it ended in 1982. Some pro-abortion lawmakers have ignored the deadline and passed the amendment anyway, including the Nevada legislature in 2017 and Illinois in 2018.

Virginia is expected to become the 38th and final state needed to ratify the ERA to the Constitution after pro-abortion Democrats gained control of the state legislature this month.

However, many have raised questions about if the states’ votes count after the deadline and if other states that voted to ratify but later to rescind their ratification also should be considered.

On Monday, the Justice Department basically settled the question.

“We conclude that Congress had the constitutional authority to impose a deadline on the ratification of the ERA and, because that deadline has expired, the ERA Resolution is no longer pending before the States,” it stated.

This is great news for pro-life Americans.

It means that they can stop being as defensive against this measure, and go on the offense to make actual wins, like reversing Roe v. Wade.

Reversing Roe v. Wade would finally make it possible for states to pass outright bans on abortion without the courts shutting them down.

Do you think abortion should be illegal?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

112 COMMENTS

  1. It is a choice between a woman her partner and doctor. You folks on here don’t want big government interfering in your life what gives you the right to take that choice away from women who don’t share your religious values.

    We aren’t talking about god or the devil but about you folks are trying to impose your moral values on everyone else.

    No Thanks.

  2. WRONG! You democrats are trying to force doctors to perform abortions when it goes against their religion, and then make taxpayers pay for the abortion.

  3. I have tried twice already to leave a comment, but for some reason they are not showing up.
    GOD bless President Trump for providing a voice for these innocent souls that are being murdered everyday , via abortions, and can not defend themselves!!
    Oh and it’s not Planned Parenthood. As I have named them, it’s Planned Murder…

  4. Planned Parenthood claims to be an organization for “women’s health”. If so, they should change their name instead of gaslighting the entire nation.

  5. Also, pretty ironic to accuse conservatives of imposing morals on others when liberals are the ones telling people that “bruh” is “verbal blackface”.

  6. Jack: Please don’t give us this right to choose nonsense. How about using some form( which there are many out there by the way) of birth control so the woman doesn’t GET pregnant to begin with ! No one has the right to kill an innocent life that has no voice of their own to defend themselves.
    Let’s be honest Jack, you are just posting your comment because you hate Trump and it has nothing to do with you siding with the right to choose option for women. I have read your very disrespectful and vile comments to women that are for Trump. This doesn’t sound like someone that cares about a women’s rights. Or respect women in general.
    You stated you have a bible next to your chair, didn’t you? But yet you condemn us for our religious values.
    What are your values, Jack? I think you also stated your mom has passed in.So you can’t thank her personally , at least you thank her in a prayer for not having the same mind set you obviously do.

  7. According to Democrats, women have the right to be strong and independent and express their opinions, as long as those opinions conform exactly to the ideals of modern liberalism. Once a woman doesn’t conform to liberalism, it’s okay to be misogynistic and call her a “Karen”.

  8. Just here to fill in for Vasu and let you know to become vegan to save the cows. After all, one of them is Vasu’s mom.

  9. Vasu’s Pal; Don’t worry. Vasu will be rearing his very misinformed Leftists head soon. Never fails to bore us to death with nonsense that no one reads anymore. And because Vasu is a Hindu perhaps you are correct about who his mother really is. No, let me correct that. It has been proven cows are very sensitive, smart animals, so I think we are both wrong!!
    Thanks for the laugh though!

  10. The Bible permits abortion. Pro-lifers must become secular.

    Genesis 38:24. Tamar’s pregnancy was proof that she was sexually active. Because she was a widow, without a husband, she was assumed to be a prostitute. Her father-in-law, Judah, ordered that she be burned alive for her crime.

    If Tamar’s fetuses had any value whatsoever, her execution would have been delayed until after their birth. There was no condemnation on Judah for deciding to take this action.

    Exodus 21:22-24. If two men are fighting and one injures a pregnant woman and the fetus is killed, he shall repay her according to the degree of injury inflicted upon *her*,and not the fetus.

    Author Brian McKinley, a born-again Christian, comments:

    “Thus we can see that if the baby is lost, it does not require a death sentence-it is not considered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder and is punished by death.”

    Halacha (Jewish Law) does define when a fetus becomes a nephesh (person), a full-fledged human being, when the head emerges from the womb. Before then, the fetus is considered a “partial-life”; it gains full human status after birth only.

    The Babylonian Talmud (Yevamot 69b) states that: “the embryo is considered to be mere water until the fortieth day.” Afterward, it is considered subhuman until it is born.

    Rashi, the great 12th century commentator on the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud, states clearly of the fetus ‘lav nephesh hu — it is not a person.’

    The Talmud contains the expression, “the thigh of its mother,” i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part and parcel of the pregnant woman’s body.

    This is grounded in Exodus 21:22. That biblical passage outlines the Mosaic Law in a case where a man is responsible for causing a woman’s miscarriage, which kills the fetus.

    If the woman survives, then the perpetrator has to pay a fine to the woman’s husband. If the woman is killed, the perpetrator is also killed. This indicates that the fetus has value, but does not have the status of a person.

    There are two additional passages in the Talmud which shed some light on abortion. They imply that the fetus is considered part of its mother:

    One section states that if a man purchases a cow that is found to be pregnant, then he is owner of both the cow and the fetus.

    Another section states that if a pregnant woman converts to Judaism, that her conversion also applies to her fetus.

    Some Jewish authorities have ruled in specific cases. one case involved a woman who becomes pregnant while nursing a child. Her milk supply would dry up. If the child is allergic to all other forms of nutrition except mother’s milk, then it would starve.

    An abortion would be permitted in this case, a potential person, would be justified to save the life of the child, an actual person.

    Judaism supports abortion access for women. Polls show 90 percent of American Jews supporting abortion rights.

    Pro-life apologists say at least the unborn has *some* value in the Old Testament, if not actual or real personhood. But the New Testament is more permissive than the Old Testament!

    In Christianity, Paul’s gospel displaces Jesus’ gospel. Jesus, a rabbi, repeatedly upheld Mosaic Law (Matthew 5:17-19; Mark 10:17-22; Luke 16:17) as did his apostles (see chapters 10, 15, and 21 of Acts). Paul, however, claims Mosaic Law has been abolished, referring to his previous adherence to the Law as “so much garbage…”

    So even if you could find a verse in the Old Testament indicating concern for the unborn, Paul, and not Jesus, says it’s “garbage.”

    Like animals in contemporary American society, the Bible accords the unborn marginal concern which is often inconsistent at best.

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles. Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality.

    “This is God’s will—your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God.” (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)

    “Make no mistake,” warned Paul, “no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion, no thieves or grabbers or drunkards or slanderers or swindlers, will possess the kingdom of God.” (I Corinthians 6:9-10 [NEB])

    Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12).

    He instructed them to *always* pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)

    Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshiping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14)

    According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles, but would it matter if he had?

    Conservative Christians are quick to condemn anyone preaching a false gospel, but some conservative Christians argue not only that they’re not under Mosaic Law, but that they don’t have to follow Paul, either, because Paul claims the risen Jesus said to him three times “…my grace is sufficient for thee…” and they take this biblical verse as a license to do as they please.

    If their view prevails, then:

    What basis do pro-life Christians have for prohibiting abortion?

    Doesn’t “three times…” justify choice?

    Secular pro-life arguments are religion-neutral and thus applicable to everyone, including atheists and agnostics.

    The pro-life movement ALREADY HAS the support of organized religion.

    Instead of preaching to the choir, i.e., wasting time with religion, pro-lifers should focus on embryology and prenatal development, DNA, RNA, etc. to make their case to our mainstream secular society.

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

  11. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Judah was always right. The Bible portrays the twelve sons of Jacob as good people, but flawed. For example, Joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers, and they were later shamed for it. Similarly, in the case of Tamar, Judah was simply wrong! He was not condemned for it because during the events of the Bible, the Bible did not yet exist.

  12. Exodus 21:22-24. If two men are fighting and one injures a pregnant woman and the fetus is killed, he shall repay her according to the degree of injury inflicted upon *her*,and not the fetus.

    Author Brian McKinley, a born-again Christian, comments:

    “Thus we can see that if the baby is lost, it does not require a death sentence-it is not considered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder and is punished by death.”

    Pro-life apologists say at least the unborn has *some* value in the Old Testament, if not actual or real personhood. But the New Testament is more permissive than the Old Testament!

    In Christianity, Paul’s gospel displaces Jesus’ gospel. Jesus, a rabbi, repeatedly upheld Mosaic Law (Matthew 5:17-19; Mark 10:17-22; Luke 16:17) as did his apostles (see chapters 10, 15, and 21 of Acts). Paul, however, claims Mosaic Law has been abolished, referring to his previous adherence to the Law as “so much garbage…”

    So even if you could find a verse in the Old Testament indicating concern for the unborn, Paul, and not Jesus, says it’s “garbage.”

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles, but would it matter if he had?

    Conservative Christians are quick to condemn anyone preaching a false gospel, but some conservative Christians argue not only that they’re not under Mosaic Law, but that they don’t have to follow Paul, either, because Paul claims the risen Jesus said to him three times “…my grace is sufficient for thee…” and they take this biblical verse as a license to do as they please, conveniently ignoring the rest of the moral instructions Paul gives throughout his epistles.

    If their view prevails, then:

    What basis do pro-life Christians have for prohibiting abortion?

    Doesn’t “three times…” justify choice?

    Secular pro-life arguments are religion-neutral and thus applicable to everyone, including atheists and agnostics.

    The pro-life movement ALREADY HAS the support of organized religion.

    Instead of preaching to the choir, i.e., wasting time with religion, pro-lifers should focus on embryology and prenatal development, DNA, RNA, etc. to make their case to our mainstream secular society.

  13. Nobody is taking away women’s rights to decide if they will bear a child. They have every right in the world to decide not to bear children. What they don’t have the right to do is to kill unborn innocent human beings. Human beings which are completely innocent of all crimes and completely defenseless against this attack on their lives. Women have the right to chose to not become pregnant, once they do become pregnant then a new innocent life has rights also. Childbirth is a natural process, so its a fallacy that an abortion is for the health of the woman. 95% of pregnancies impose no risk on women at all other then the inconvenience of it. Stop using murder of innocent children as birth control.

  14. At the risk of sounding rude, the best way for a woman to have control over body and not potentially having an abortion, then she should think ahead and just keep her legs closed. Now, go ahead and crucify me for speaking logically.

  15. First it’s “God ” idiot! and it has nothing to do with religion alone. It’s flat out murder no matter how you justify it. Guys keep it zipped in your pants , there isn’t a woman worth blood on your soul. And girls keep your legs closed so that choice isn’t necessary unless violation of your anatomy is what you desire.

  16. A soul is present the moment the egg and sperm is joined. The soul is the spiritual essence of God and the mother and father are entrusted with it. The body (ashes to ashes/dust to dust) is simply an assembly of earthly ingredients (food) assembled by DNA instructions contained in the fertilized egg. Of all children, it is the most sacred, innocent. and new of the human creation. The soul will accompany the “being” (human) as a “permanent record” by which the individual will be judged at the conclusion of their “human experience”. There will be a “judgement”, but we are cautioned “judge not that ye might be judged” and “Judgement is mine sayeth the Lord”… But the message is CRYSTAL CLEAR… IN THE END, we will all be judged1

  17. This is EXCELLENT NEWS! It’s about TIME we put MORE dents in the cause of abortion, if not OUTRIGHT BAN it altogether. Abortion is WORSE than SIN (it is an ABOMINATION) as per Proverbs 6:16 (the TAKING of innocent lives). Team Trump and his allies 2020.

  18. Vasu: And satan has a very firm hold on your soul !!! No one believes you or accepts your propaganda. But it only proves to me you are being paid per word by the Demon party, that’s why you keep doing your cut and paste BS. What I can’t understand how Culture Watch keeps allowing you to keep posting the same drivel over and over again. Oh well, I just scroll pass your nonsense, no matter how long or how short….

  19. With a several years long waiting list for adoptive parents, you would think adoption would be viable for women not wanting a child. There are thousands that do want one. Murder is not the answer. Too many woman use abortion as a method of birth control. Shameful!

  20. Mautri shutup and go away. No one cares what you say and no ones reads your crap. As for you Jack, if abortion is so great, why didn’t YOUR mother use it on you??? Now, think about that.

  21. If we stand up for abortion, when we stand before God, we will have to answer to all the murders that went on, if they don’t want a child, before they have a sexual relationship they should use birth Control, God is the only one that should have the authority to take a life..it is everyone’s job to stand up for these innocent little precious babies..murder is murder anyway you look at it..

  22. Paul’s request three times in response to his pleading with God to take away the “ thorn in his side” has absolutely nothing to do with your answer that Christians use this verse to take liberties with their freedom in Christ…Also, how do we know with certainty, that if a child dies in the womb of its mother, the offended man may seek his life in return…in fact, that would correspond with an eye for an eye, a life for a life. Personhood is a legal term used today instead of human being in the womb which can exist outside it’s mother. Children are a Gift from God. Children in the womb have “ the breath of Life within them” are are Protected in the Womb until Birth. Hindu’s believe in Reincarnation. It is appointed unto man to die once, and then the Judgement. Resurrection is diametrically opposed to reincarnation. You speak of Animal Rights, but not the Rights of an Unborn Child. No big deal to you…the unborn child can reincarnate into whatever…your religion is cruel and even Mahatmah Ghandi was reasonable when it came to discourse with Christians and he loathed the Class of People classified as the “ Untouchables.” He preached against it and well he did as it makes zero sense since one can never escape his doom as an untouchable. Brahmin’s are so fortunate…Your Religion in its Raw Form has come West and made palatable for the Western Appetite. Like a smorgasboard to pick and choose what’s desirable to fallen sinful man….East came West…Muthatmah Ghandi had it right to do away with The Untouchable Class. Everything you spew is destestable in the Eyes of A Holy, Perfect and Sovereign God.

  23. It is murder Jack whether you want to admit it or not. You liberal lunatics always talk about the rights of the women but never mention a word about the rights of the precious innocent babies that the mothers murder like barbarians. There is absolutely no way a person can have a conscious and agree with the murdering of those precious innocent babies.

  24. A side from the moral concerns of abortion, just think what the 50-60 million babies aborted could have done for our country. Maybe our social security coffers could be fuller due to more of these grown up babies would have been working & contributing to this, maybe these babies could have found the discovery & cure for so many devastating diseases, maybe they could have found scientific wonders to help the world’s population in so many ways and in so many other great benefits such as replacing the LIBNUTS that we have that are ruining our country.

  25. Pam, you are very right and thank you for your profound bravery and decency. Hard for me to believe that anyone can go to heaven that is barbaric enough to murder innocent precious babies.

  26. Well, Jack, a woman also has a choice not to have unprotected sex. Why do you always leave that out of the equation?

  27. I think Roe – vs – Wade should stand… As long as it is rare, early, and safe. If the left wants to argue then I’m all for reversing this it…

  28. While I am a independent voter, I have one thing about abortion, some woman are known to become pregnant while using birth control, these woman as well as the many out there that are not ready for motherhood or should never be mothers in the fist place, while I agree abortion is a form of murder, I can see that as long as it is performed during the first trimester, and only during the first trimester, it would stop children that are not wanted, drug addicted or mentally disabled due to the actions of the unfit mother in the first place. I have helped a few girls that got pregnant, knew they were not ready ( or were messed up in drugs) through until the child was born and placed with a family for adoption, ( and even though the child survived, getting them through the withdrawals was a terrible experience for the child and all involved, but what long term effects will not be known for many years ) still not all of these unwanted children are so lucky ( one girl gave birth twice and we were lucky enough to place them with the same family ), and end up in foster care, abused , and even killed by the ones taking care of them, or in mental institutions for all their lives, So under some curcumstances abortion maybe the right thing, but only during the first trimester

  29. Vince it should be left to the states if you live in a red team state make it illegal however if you live in a blue team state and the population wants it legal then it should be that state’s right.

    That way everyone wins if a woman chooses to have a child her choice. If a woman chooses against it and seeks an abortion that is her right. Not the state or some Christian Chruch

  30. This is welcome news to me. When I was younger I was a Democrat, I thought that the right to choose was a good thing for women, but could never really understand why women didn’t just have their baby and give it up for adoption rather then abort it. Over the last 40 or more years my views have changed…a lot. I voted for Trump(because I couldn’t in good faith vote for Hillary). In the last few years I have seen so many changes in the Democratic party that I feel they no longer represent me and my beliefs. I found the Republican party is a lot closer to the way I feel and believe about things so I switched parties. I am now pro-life and against abortion too. I agree there are a lot of other options out there available for woman who are sexually active then abortion. May God bless America again….Trump in 2020!

  31. Seems like all the wrong people were aborted.
    If the Dems/Libs were all aborted, America would be the most sane country on the planet.

  32. I am sick and tired of hearing about woman’s rights! That unborn child has a right also. He didn’t ask to be conceived but for some reason the demo rats don’t care about human life. People need to grow up and take responsibility for there actions.

  33. Calling someone a “Karen” is a STUPID application of good name. Is your name Karen? If so, should you be ashamed by stupid people finding a derogatory meaning in you name?

  34. That baby is a living thing, a little human and when you take that life, that is called MURDER. Demoncrats can call it whatever they want but it is in fact, MURDER.

  35. Joseph C. Moore(USN Ret) I do not know why you are attacking me. I didn’t make up that definition . Nor did I call anyone that name. I just did not understand it’s meaning….Thank you.

  36. Jack, you moron. Abortion wasn’t available when trump was born and it’s a damn good thing. You can still abort yourself if you wanna end up with hitler

  37. Laws are based on facts and common sense regarding human rights. No one has denied a woman reproductive choice- she can choose to not get pregnant in many ways. But the facts of human life beginning at conception is science and reasoning, not primarily religious. Morals are a part of laws. Morals criminalize kidnapping, rape, theft, perjury…so just because religious people also value these do not mean it is not a secular value. Abortion kills a human LIFE. Is it ok to kill you when you are defenseless, or mentally handicapped, or in a coma, or useless to society? No. Neither is killing babies a Constitutional or human right…it is denying rights to the defenseless, like slavery …it is wrong…with or without the Bible. You impose your values of devaluing life…but others have no right to propose their value. Wrong!

  38. You were born, does that give me the right to terminate you? No! That’s called MURDER! Same thing if you terminate a pregnancy at any stage. That is a human being! Go see an infertility doctor and see what they do to help a WOMAN conceive! Learn about the complexity! I feel sorry for you.

  39. And you are just very uninformed as a human being vasu! Very informed as a reader and repeater of non-sense. Don’t try to mold things from words to fit your agenda. Who gave women the right to murder? Humans and nothing else. What right does the man have? It’s quite simple! I’ll tell you one more time. Terminate a life while making a plan to do so is pre meditated murder by definition of law. You hypocrites make up things as you go. Keep twisting the fathers words and your price will be enormous. FYI

  40. I’m certain that my comment will not be considered because I do not totally agree with either side. I think making abortion illegal would just push abortions back to the back alley where unqualified people would perform them on desperate girls. You know — like Prohibition. It didn’t stop people from drinking, it opened up more crime and horrible gutrot liquor. Please understand, I think abortion is wrong, but because I think it morally wrong, I do not feel I have the right to force my belief on everyone else. What I do feel strongly about however is that it should be legal ONLY in the first 3 months. Since my twins were born at 7 months, I cannot conceive of someone waiting that long ir later to terminate a pregnancy.

  41. Absolutely agree. The same reasons I left the democrats. I had been one all my life and far too much has changed and not for the better! God bless…..

  42. If the baby is not a life then why if a pregnant woman is killed in an auto accident the accused is charged with 2 murder murders. You can’t have it both ways. Also women and men should have responsible sex like condoms birth control pills iud the pill called the day after but not murder.

  43. It’s not a choice, it’s a live human. The woman didn’t make the child but contributed her effort into making it happen. Why is murder outside the womb legal but inside illegal? It’s alive and breathng thru it’s mother’s blood until it’s born.

  44. The abortionist and liberals are imposing it on us tax payers. The gov wants us to pay for them.
    Abortion is murder but if the left leaners want them then they should pay for them and answer to God in the end.
    I heard someone say that when women who have had abortions pass on that aborted child’s spirit stands before the mother and asks why?
    Don’t know how true it is but as we all know, when we leave this place we have to account for each and every action.

  45. A woman’s right to choice is before a child is conceived. A woman that doesn’t want to get pregnant, should know what happens when they have unprotected sex. Abortion is murder of an unwilling participant. The USA Constitution fights for these unborn children as they don’t have the option of choice.

  46. Jack, you are an idiot. Of course a woman has a right to choose what she wants to do with her body. She has the right to choose to have sex or refuse sex. If she decides to have sex she also accepts the risks of getting pregnant. It’s no different than any of us getting behind the wheel of a car. We know we could be killed or maimed but we accept those risks.
    Once she becomes pregnant she has a responsibility to take care of the unborn baby & later the baby. Hopefully the father will be there to share those responsibilities but as long as she is pregnant she is responsible for that little body that’s growing inside her. That’s right, it’s a body so it isn’t the woman’s body that she’s dealing with, it’s a baby’s body. So when you liberals say it’s a woman’s body & she can do with her body whatever she wants, that isn’t true. It’s an entirely different, separate body & that separate body is a living baby that is being butchered & tortured in the name of abortion. Then the baby is scalped & it’s scalp sold as are it’s other body parts. And you liberals are for this barbaric practice. This has nothing to do with religion, this is something a third world country would do & any one who has any morals at all would condemn the practice.

    As gruesome as abortion is it doesn’t touch how awful partial birth abortion is. I’m sure you are on board with this practice too Jack since you are so pro woman. I doubt you even know what it is but you are for it because I have met so many idiots like you who support pba & when I explain to them what it is they tell me I’m lying to them. So Jack, are you for killing a baby who is partially born, not completely out, so the doctor kills this live baby before it can get all the way out of it’s mother. What sicko legalized this type of murder & what type of demon could perform it? I think it’s been outlawed now in most places but it did happen & people did support it. How do you justify carrying a baby full term & then killing it when it’s barely outside it’s mother’s body? No, religion has nothing to do with being against abortion.

  47. Agreed. There are so many couples who cannot conceive. Instead of killing their own babies why dont these women give birth and put their babies up for adoption. Granted they would have some months of inconvenience (sarcasm) but their babies would have a chance at life.

  48. Trump proves once again that he’s a white male misogynist and has no regard for civil rights. He panders to the worst people in the USA.

  49. A better solution would be if women stopped sleeping around with every guy they run into. It’s the women that are in charge of this, not the men. Rape is actually quite rare relative to consensual sex. If women stopped bed hopping then it would save money and no babies would have to be murdered. That way everyone wins.

  50. Codeblue; You are so correct, thank you. Every time Culture Watch has stories about abortions it makes me stomach churn. I HATE revisiting the horrors these poor innocent souls experience while being murdered !How we haven fallen so deeply into moral decay. These doctor’s and these women WILL be judged someday and their punishment will be for an eternity….

  51. HCB: You said Trump panders to the worst people in the USA. Funny but that’s how we Conservatives describe the demon party and ALL their unintelligent fools that votes them in.
    Guess your support abortions , huh? Well, that’s shows what kind of morals you have. NONE !!!!

  52. I don’t think abortion should be banned… Banning anything is just stupid.. never goes well for anyone. I do however believe that a women should be responsible for her decisions… MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND ABOUT ABORTION BEFORE THERE IS A HEART BEAT. Seriously…. there is no excuse in this day and age to get pregnant and have an abortion… there are hundreds of form of birth control. Even young girls can get a pod put in the ir arm BIRTH CONTROL FOR 5 YRS MOM. I can really not see one reason any woman would kill a baby at BIRTH. IT IS ONLY PART OF THE DISCUSSION BECAUSE THESE WACK JOB WOMEN JUST HAVE TO TAKE THEIR STUPID ASS DELUSIONS AND GO WAY TOO FAR. They always take it to the point of absolute INSANITY with their its my body crap… and most of them are full of crap. I agree it is their body but IF YOU DON’T TAKE CARE AND PROTECT YOURSELF… NO ONE IS REQUIRED TO ASSIST YOU IN MURDERING YOUR CHILD. DUE TO YOUR LACK OF COMMON SENSE and MORALS
    .

  53. I agree. Abortion is plain murder!
    It is choosing to put to death someone’s life!!That is murder. “Thou shalt not kill.”

  54. Karen kava; I don’t know if your comment is directed at me but I was not the one that used that name or attached a definition to calling someone a Karen. Or called anyone anything derogatory. And IF your comment was directed at me, I am sick of defending myself. I was not the original poster. I am here to discuss this abomination called Planned Parenthood. Nothing more. If you took offence look up who used that term. Thank you.
    P.S. And who the heck is NANCYP???

  55. Linda M.; I have read all the comments here and you did not say or do anything wrong. You have always been kind to other posters, which includes the jerk Jack. You always stay on point. But you are being blamed unfairly. Don’t worry about it. God bless and stay strong .

  56. Sandy L; Thank you for the wise decision of becoming a Republican , and for your testimony ! I only hope more Democrats will be as wise as you come this election. GOD Bless!!

  57. Abortion is far better than child abuse, and this is what would happen to these children, they would become unwanted, and would likely be poor and have to be looked after by the state, which never seems to be a picnic for children. And to top all this off, a middle class person cannot afford to have children anymore. Folks that decide to have children usually lose them to the child care places that have a constant review of child abuse, and then you send them to school, which turns out to be programing. It seems to me that all the pale skinned people are being accused of things like racism but dark skinned folks are still allowed to hate pale skinned people…America is not the world, it is a couple continents across the Ocean from where the world started, and pale skinned folks are the minority and hated the most around the world. Thus we are tricked into believing that our world is overpopulated and decide not to have children and thus will be run down by the dark skinned folks, because there are way more of them, and they are still having children. We are being duped as usual…

  58. jack, you are truly a FOOL!!!! So it is just fine to murder a baby. You are extremely SICK!!! it is a BABY whether in or out of the womb, just a different stage of development. NO WOMAN has the right to kill her child!!!!!! Life begins at conception. Try reading a biology book

  59. vasu, you quote from the Bible but have no concept of what it teaches. Your posting are empty, void of understanding.

  60. jackass, Jesus forbids your sick hatred. And Jesus forgives all who come to Him. Pres. Trump is very fortunate that Jesus will be his judge and not you. Jesus will be YOUR judge, too. Since you have rejected Him, He will reject you for eternity

  61. jack, it is murdering a baby. Murder is a CRIME!!!! Abortion is the worst kind of murder…the murder of the most innocent and helpless human beings. It is a BABY whether in or out of the womb, just a different stage of development. You are extremely sick!!!!!!!

  62. HCB….YOU ARE A LIAR!!!!! NOTHING you ever say about Pres. Trump is true. Why do you come to a conservative Christian site? You know nothing at all about either. You just spew your sick hate and lies. You are a very sad excuse for a human being.

  63. joe… You have no clue at all about what would happen to them. God created and loves us all and He forbids the murder of helpless innocent babies

  64. It’s not considered murder in the case of an attack on the woman because it is considered a side effect from the attack on the woman. A deliberate abortion is different.

  65. Rape is simply irrelevant. A person who is conceived as a result of rape has just as much right to live as anyone else. Rape is truly a horrific crime, but rape doesn’t justify murder!

  66. It’s only legal now because a bunch of village idiots made a law AND your mother could’ve saved us all if she had which could be done then too.

  67. Roe V Wade is ON ITS FACE a moot decision. First, the entire court case is and was a sham. It was a “what if these were the circumstances case. If anyone has ever heard the plaintiff in the case speak to the public they know that her attorneys did not state facts, they created the perfect what if case. Our plaintiff never appeared in any court to verify the complaint at all.
    Years later when she became literate she actually read the court documents and case. IT was all LIES. This makes the case NULL regardless of which court has heard it or how long ago. A null or void case such as this, regardless of WHEN or IF the court learns of the fraud is as if it never existed.
    Legal beagles KNOW of this case, they know it is null and void and as if it never existed. The problem is that too many cases have been developed from the results of THIS case to reverse it. This would throw the entire country into chaos (which was the original intent of the case).
    I say that the TRUTH should be told to the court directly in a filing posthumously by the Plaintiff. This is ONLY JUST and RIGHT. Virtually every case that has mentioned RvW will be suspect for lack of THE precedent that caused its verdict!

  68. My response is simple. If you don’t want to get pregnant, get on some form of birth control and make sure your partner is using protection too. It takes 2 to create a baby after all.

    If you don’t want the baby, don’t kill it! That baby is the victim if you kill him or her. He or she didn’t asked to be conceived but killing an innocent baby is not the justifiable answer to the problem.

    Some people can’t get pregnant as easy as others can. And other people can’t get pregnant at all. Give the baby a chance to live so someone else can give that innocent child a home.

  69. The thoughts of what the “innocent babies” go through in the process of abortion “should be enough to
    make any human being with a heart, “know abortion is a “torturous murder”. Doctors “rip the babies
    arms and legs off, crush the skull………………… HORRIFYING TORTURE! Anyone who supports , votes
    for those who support it, doctors who perform the “TORTURE”, nurses who participate in the procedures…….
    ALL l have the blood of the thousands of babies on their hands. it’s sad that Roe v. Wade was passed in the first place. It’s time for it to be a “thing of the past”. My heart breaks for all the pain babies have suffered because of them.

  70. plain and simple explanation murder and just plain wrong.babies should be given love and care
    by both parents mom and dad.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here