Trump just got what he needs to drive the final stake into the heart of Roe v. Wade

102

For decades, Roe v. Wade has allowed the legal murder of millions of unborn babies.

With President Trump in office, pro-lifers have been hopeful that it will finally be reversed.

And Trump just got what he needs to drive the final stake in the heart of Roe v. Wade.

States continue to try to pass laws that prevent the grizzly act of abortion.

But many of these laws end up getting blocked due to the Roe v. Wade ruling that gives women the right to abortions.

In order to reverse that decision, a case needs to come before the court.

And an Alabama law may be able to give them that case.

The law made waves because it outright bans almost all abortions.

But a federal judge just ruled it unconstitutional, with Roe v. Wade being the core reason why.

United Press International reports:

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked an Alabama law that would have imposed a near-total ban on abortion, beginning next month.

The law was set to take effect on Nov. 15, and aims to bar abortions at any stage of pregnancy. It does not exempt the procedure in cases of rape or incest.

The state’s Human Life Protection Act would have caused “serious and irreparable harm,” judge Myron H. Thompson said in his decision.

The injunction prevents the law from entering force while legal challenges move through the courts.

“A new total ban imposes substantial costs on women, including those who are unable to obtain an abortion and those ‘desperately seek to exercise their ability to decide whether to have a child’ and thus ‘would take unsafe measures to end their pregnancies,” Thompson added, citing a related 2014 lawsuit.

Planned Parenthood Southeast President Staci Fox said the ruling is a temporary victory.

“We said it from the start: this ban is blatantly unconstitutional and we will fight it every step of the way,” she said.

While this is bad news for pro-life Americans, this may have been the plan from the beginning.

This decision can now be challenged, and potentially make its way up the Supreme Court, which will give Roe v. Wade a chance at reversal.

Do you hope the Supreme Court repeals Roe v. Wade?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

102 COMMENTS

  1. Racist White Democrats and activist judges will fight this all the way because they know most abortions are performed on black babies.

  2. “decide to have a child”, “unconstitutional”??? It is MURDER!!! So it is okay for a woman to decide to murder her baby? Life begins at conception and our Constitution protects life. It is NEVER okay to murder the most helpless and innocent human beings except to save the life of the mother.

    • Not to mention that Planned Parenthood sell baby parts from the murdered unborn children. It is heartbreaking. I pray for a reversal and for God’s light to come upon these demon possessed people. Jay Sekolow ACLJ is fighting this in court now. Planned Parenthood can’t run away from this horrific soulless actions.

      • Typical male thinking. True the baby didn’t do anything but the womans physical and mental health are priority. Have you ever been raped? It is a brutal act and will leave women with great mental health problems. Many women will withdrawl from society, not trusting people and every time a man touches you, you freak, then there are the nightmares every night and bein afraid to sleep, the last thing a woman needs is an unwanted pregnacy from her attacker. As the child grows its a constant reminder of what happened. Many women have committed suicide after rape and that increases if you have constant reminders when your carrying your rapists child. There are strong women out there but there are many women that were broken before the rape and it compounds the problem. If your sister was raped or lets say your dad raped your sister, would you be saying the same thing?Would you make your sister carry that child? Are you going to be able to watch her cry daily because she can’t deal with it? I’m sorry but my mental and physical health takes priority.

        • Fortunately or unfortunately, a government will play a major part in determination of where priority is placed. Unfortunately, government in all of its use of force can be very callous at times. The callousness can go either way.

    • Actually the Constitution protects government above anything else. By the way, personhood and especially citizenship have sadly always been predicated upon birth. Clarification that citizenship of the offspring of a citizen begins when the offspring is conceived would require a major overhaul of our entire system of law. We might have to introduce the concept of “conception certification”, but yet nobody at all seems to actually be advocating for that.

  3. “cause serious and irreparable harm”??? Yes, it kills babies. But it is fine for the mothers to murder their children. The judge is very sick

  4. “Oh God! Have Mercy and Forgive us for we are fearfully and wonderfully formed in our Mother’s womb. You knit us together!”
    God! Bless America!

  5. If a women plays without taking percashion and conceives, then I believe she must assume her responsibility, however if, she is a young girl or women that has truly been forced ( RAPED ), to further victimized her, by forcing her, to carry that man who forced her ( against her will ) baby is totally wrong. GOD I believe would not condone it, that unborn not yet child made by sin victimizing a innocent human being is to be stopped before it has become. Any man can talk out their other end but, if they could be the victim or perhaps their daughter or sister or, wife was the victim, I believe they would sing a different tune !

    • Kenneth…Never mind what you believe. Please show me where in the Bible it commands to murder a baby (yes, it is a baby) that is the result of rape. I could not find such a command.

      • When did I say, after it is a baby, until it has a beating heart, it is not, but that poor victim is a victim. Bad enough she has to live with that horrible moment the rest of her life, are you saying she is to carry it give birth to it. I suppose you think she should raise it to so she can be daily reminded of what that bastard did to her !!!

          • Chris: Do not attempt to put words in my mouth, not once did I say or even imply after it is alive, your trying to take it yet to a next level, after it is born to murder. Perhaps your so fixed on your belief, your mind is not able to except in full contents what people say, if it don’t fit your way of thinking. I myself don’t twist other people’s words, it’s insulting!

          • You have no logical defense for your argument that it is okay to kill an unborn fetus but not a newborn baby. There is a point at which labor can be induced in order to release the fetus and have it born as a baby, though there may be problems from premature birth. Why do you consider it a person only after it exits the mother?

        • Kenneth; There are Husbands and Wives that would gladly adopt such a beautiful baby and give it a good caring home.. That goes for all unwanted children too.. Today, they harvest baby parts and stem cells for profit, that is sick..

        • Her baby could be a blessing that wipes out the horror of her rape. Her baby could be the best part of her life. You obviously never thought about that.

          • Culper Ring: You will not get the FACT that the victim may “not be developed enough” to carry and, give life to that not yet baby and, might cost her, “her life because of people” who think they know what GOD wants. GOD says THOU SHALL NOT JUDGE, that’s what these people are doing when they call the women a murderer. But it will be O.K. if a girl dies because she is forced against her rights, to carry/give birth, because of people that think they have the right to make other people do as they think/say. They are playing GOD!

          • True, but in the case of rape, the baby is present on the mother’s “property” without such mother’s permission. In some places, property owners do not have to tolerate that crap, regardless of the intruder being human, pet, livestock, wild or alien, regardless of the presence being on purpose or by accident. Ha!

          • Eviction doesn’t have to equal murder. If I have a guest who overstays his welcome, I can kick him to the curb, but I can’t suck his brain out of his head with vaccuum pressure and throw his body in the trash.

          • Hello, Barney. Well, that only serves to underscore the difference between a cruel, highly-specific, late-term feticide procedure (involving the exact same non-cruel technique that would be applied to remove “material” that is already dead by whatever cause) and the deliberate dispossession of an embryo or a zygote. There is no central nervous system, to be voraciously sucked out, in either an embryo or a zygote. The inhumanity of mutilating a lifeform to the point of death, rather than strictly the compacting of that which already be a corpse, is meant to be acknowledged and underscored. We are conversing with people who willfully and unapologetically ignore the difference. As to the analogy, we cannot reasonably expect somebody to carve up the walls or the ceiling in order to create an exit big enough to non-injuriously remove an illegal intruder, everything but a guest, who is too big to otherwise be removed at all and who may (or certainly will) die anyway. Ha!

          • Hello, Barbara Rench. The Constitution of the United States makes no reference to the “pursuit of happiness”. The Declaration of Independence of the United States, however, does. Whereas notably the fifth amendment to the Constitution mentions, “life, liberty, or property”, as not allowed to be deprived without due process of law. The first ten of such amendments and the twenty-seventh amendment come from the United States “Bill of Rights”.

            DOI: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

            “5A” in the Articles of Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

        • Kenneth Bottomley, do you think the poor woman or girl who was raped and became pregnant won’t have to live with it for the rest of her life either way? If she kills the baby, she’ll have to live with that AND the rape. Killing the baby won’t resolve her situation.

        • Thank you Ken Marx, someone who makes sense. There was actually a case not long ago, where a rape victim carried her baby to term and was raising her child ( shes one tough woman). Her rapist went to prison and when he got out, he sued her for 50/50 custody and he got it. The judge said he paid for his crime so he has every right to see his son. Really??? Ive heard where people say get rid of the judge but meanwhile you have to obey the judges actions or go to jail. Our system is f..ked up and until the system is fixed, women should not be forced to carry a rapists child.

          • The judge in that case very likely made his decision as a consequence of state law. Opining on it is hard to without all of the details of the case. For one thing, apart from faith in the justice system, we might not know for sure that the sexual act that took place was in fact forceful, coercive, extortive or otherwise involving exploitation of sleep or unconsciousness. Granted it does seem odd that the biological father or his attorney would have had a weak criminal defense but yet not a weak custody petition.

            The United States have the fairest most transparent justice system in the world, but even so, we still have not overcome the problem of some people not being able to recruit adequate legal counsel in needful amounts of time. Often the outcome of a court case will be heavily contingent upon which adjudicating party has more resources at his/her/its disposal. Judges can easily be spammed with “evidence” in one party’s favor. Juries can be fooled by one party’s courtroom theatrics. Often judges are automatically against a non-lawyer who chooses to represent himself or herself, when the opposing side is everything the contrary. That is something that ought to be addressed in law.

      • Where in the new testament are people authorized to invasively police other people on account of sins committed or thought to have been committed for that matter? There are many things that are not even acknowledged in the bible.

    • It’s not the babies fault that the pregnancy came about in this way, or the girls…the bottom line is…From the moment of inception, this fetus ( baby) is viable, and has its own DNA, thus, as much a human being as you and me…a right to life..
      As far as God goes, picture him on your living room couch, if you asked him face to face, HE gave us 10 COMMANDments, and the 5th one is Thou shall not KILL..and under no circumstances, would HE fudge on that Command…I have heard of circumstances where the gal raped, now is happy she decided to give birth, and is delighted with her child..

      • As much as people like to ignore it, there are options other than abortion and raising a child. Adoption should be made easier. In fact, the current system makes it almost impossible for a large family to adopt another child, when in fact, it is they who have already proven themselves competent!

  6. YOU MAY WANT TO GOOGLE “ALETEIA” AND THE INSPIRING STORY OF FATHER ALFAR ANTONIO VELEZ WHO IS GRATEFUL THAT HIS MOTHER REFUSED AN ABORTION. “SHE KEPT THE BABY SHE CONCEIVED WHEN RAPED AND TODAY HE IS A PRIEST WHO DEFENDS LIFE”.

    ALSO

    IF YOU GOOGLE 30,000 DOCTORS SAY, “ABORTION IS NEVER MEDICALLY NECESSARY TO SAVE A MOTHER’S LIFE.” ………..3/5/2019

    I BELIEVE IT WAS PRESIDENT REAGAN WHO SAID, “IT’S FUNNY, EVERYONE WHO IS PRO-CHOICE HAS ALREADY BEEN BORN!”

    • I want you to understand clearly, I have been on this earth 67yrs. Over all those years, I have met around the country several rape victims mostly women but also male, that spoke of what it did, how it has affected their life, the haunting memories that won’t go away. I listen to not only what they said but mostly their voice and how they acted. These were people that have live with that inside them a very long time and yet, still extremely affected ( years later ), you read all you want, choose to think and believe as you will, but to stop further mental damage of the innocent is their right, not yours and others not in their shoes. The problem with people of today is their to damn full of their self and think the whole should think and do as they think and say, it is their body, their life, their and only their decision, THEIR BUSINESS, THEIR RIGHT !!!!

  7. bj said to Kenneth, “Please show me where in the Bible it commands to murder a baby.”

    The Bible permits abortion. Pro-lifers must become secular.

    Genesis 38:24. Tamar’s pregnancy was proof that she was sexually active. Because she was a widow, without a husband, she was assumed to be a prostitute. Her father-in-law, Judah, ordered that she be burned alive for her crime.

    If Tamar’s fetuses had any value whatsoever, her execution would have been delayed until after their birth. There was no condemnation on Judah for deciding to take this action.

    Exodus 21:22-24. If two men are fighting and one injures a pregnant woman and the fetus is killed, he shall repay her according to the degree of injury inflicted upon *her*,and not the fetus.

    Author Brian McKinley, a born-again Christian, comments:

    “Thus we can see that if the baby is lost, it does not require a death sentence-it is not considered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder and is punished by death.”

    Halacha (Jewish Law) does define when a fetus becomes a nephesh (person), a full-fledged human being, when the head emerges from the womb. Before then, the fetus is considered a “partial-life”; it gains full human status after birth only.

    The Babylonian Talmud (Yevamot 69b) states that: “the embryo is considered to be mere water until the fortieth day.” Afterward, it is considered subhuman until it is born.

    Rashi, the great 12th century commentator on the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud, states clearly of the fetus ‘lav nephesh hu — it is not a person.’

    The Talmud contains the expression, “the thigh of its mother,” i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part and parcel of the pregnant woman’s body.

    This is grounded in Exodus 21:22. That biblical passage outlines the Mosaic Law in a case where a man is responsible for causing a woman’s miscarriage, which kills the fetus.

    If the woman survives, then the perpetrator has to pay a fine to the woman’s husband. If the woman is killed, the perpetrator is also killed. This indicates that the fetus has value, but does not have the status of a person.

    There are two additional passages in the Talmud which shed some light on abortion. They imply that the fetus is considered part of its mother:

    One section states that if a man purchases a cow that is found to be pregnant, then he is owner of both the cow and the fetus.

    Another section states that if a pregnant woman converts to Judaism, that her conversion also applies to her fetus.

    Some Jewish authorities have ruled in specific cases. one case involved a woman who becomes pregnant while nursing a child. Her milk supply would dry up. If the child is allergic to all other forms of nutrition except mother’s milk, then it would starve.

    An abortion would be permitted in this case, a potential person, would be justified to save the life of the child, an actual person.

    Judaism supports abortion access for women. Polls show 90 percent of American Jews supporting abortion rights.

    Pro-life apologists say at least the unborn has *some* value in the Old Testament, if not actual or real personhood. But the New Testament is more permissive than the Old Testament!

    In Christianity, Paul’s gospel displaces Jesus’ gospel. Jesus, a rabbi, repeatedly upheld Mosaic Law (Matthew 5:17-19; Mark 10:17-22; Luke 16:17) as did his apostles (see chapters 10, 15, and 21 of Acts). Paul, however, claims Mosaic Law has been abolished, referring to his previous adherence to the Law as “so much garbage…”

    So even if you could find a verse in the Old Testament indicating concern for the unborn, Paul, and not Jesus, says it’s “garbage.”

    Like animals in contemporary American society, the Bible accords the unborn marginal concern which is often inconsistent at best.

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles. Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality.

    “This is God’s will—your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God.” (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)

    “Make no mistake,” warned Paul, “no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion, no thieves or grabbers or drunkards or slanderers or swindlers, will possess the kingdom of God.” (I Corinthians 6:9-10 [NEB])

    Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12).

    He instructed them to *always* pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)

    Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshiping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14)

    According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles, but would it matter if he had?

    Conservative Christians are quick to condemn anyone preaching a false gospel, but some conservative Christians argue not only that they’re not under Mosaic Law, but that they don’t have to follow Paul, either, because Paul claims the risen Jesus said to him three times “…my grace is sufficient for thee…” and they take this biblical verse as a license to do as they please.

    If their view prevails, then:

    What basis do pro-life Christians have for prohibiting abortion?

    Doesn’t “three times…” justify choice?

    Secular pro-life arguments are religion-neutral and thus applicable to *everyone*, including atheists and agnostics.

    The pro-life movement ALREADY HAS the support of organized religion.

    Instead of preaching to the choir, i.e., wasting time with religion, pro-lifers should focus on embryology and prenatal development, DNA, RNA, etc. to make their case to our mainstream secular society.

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

    • I appreciate your taking the time to show this information, we unforchinitly have people that think whatever they choose to believe everyone must agree with, they don’t consider that despite their belief, they might be wrong. A women doesn’t not have to reward he who raped her with a child conceived by sin!

      • Kenneth Bottomley: I have been on this earth a little longer than you sir. And I certainly firmly believe you are entitled to your opinions. But please do not thank Vasu Murii for his posting. He is a Hindu and knows nothing about being a Christian. But yet he uses ours words without understanding their true meanings. He personally knows nothing about the bible and what it contains. He is a hypocrite.
        What I am firmly against is, these young women that have abortions as a form of birth control. Especially in this day and age when there shouldn’t be ANY reason for any women to get pregnant unless she wants to be pregnant. I personally heard one very young woman bragging about it was going to have her third abortion because she and her boyfriends refused to take any precautions. This is truly a sin…
        I have read you and bj been debating about what is right and wrong about this abortion issue. Bj is very religious and she is very firm in following the word of GOD. She is a wonderful warrior for GOD. And even though I am also a Christian, I am conflicted about a woman being a victim of rape and remaining pregnant or not. I’m sure you read Ms. Morrison’s comment about a rape victim keeping the baby and he grew up to be a priest. So, even though it might appear I am talking out of both sides of my mouth, I am not. I personally believe that particular situation is between GOD and the victim of rape. But I also believe GOD allows everything that happens to us for a reason. We must choose wisely. My statement whole statement to you is because when I was 9 years old I was sexually assaulted . So I am not naïve on this subject.
        Sorry for my rambling on to you. But I do see both of your positions on this subject.
        Thank you.

        • Linda M. I agree with what you have said, many conceive because they simply don’t consider the outcome of their sinful actions, not only does this often lead to abortions, but also high risk, the abortion itself and disease, as well as the great berdon it causes we the taxpayers. I do not approve in abortions either except, when it is involving a victim, their have been cases where girls were to young and, life threatening circumstances which give justifiable reason to have one. GOD gave man freedom of choice/belief he doesn’t control are every thought /act, we are given free will, it is are responsibility to do what’s right or answer in time for are mistakes. I am truly sorry to hear that you have been a victim I pray that you are alright now.

          • Kenneth Bottomley: Thank you for kindness. It happened a very long time ago .And even though it wasn’t until much later did I understand what truly happened, I accepted it for what it was. It has never defined who I was or stopped me from growing to my full potential. I have been blessed…
            Please forgive my typing mistakes in my previous comment to you. I have a broken keyboard and every week I set out to get it replaced. But something always comes up and I forget about it. But at least you were able to understand what I was trying to say…
            Have a blessed day Kenneth. Thank you again and be well……

    • Vasu says that “So even if you could find a verse in the Old Testament indicating concern for the unborn, Paul, and not Jesus, says it’s “garbage.”” After the coming of Christ the Bible clearly states that those who live by the law shall die by the law. Why? Because no one could keep the law and all are condemned by it. You cannot claim any verse in the old testament showing concern for the fetus is garbage and not also claim that you don’t understand that the verses claiming the fetus is subhuman are also garbage. Christ said a new law I have given unto you that you love one another as I have loved you. So Christ’s love is a love willing to give his life for another. The Bible clearly says that life is in the blood. So from the time a fetus forms its own bloodtype then according to the Bible it is a life. Any female which then calls herself Christian has not the love of God if she is not willing to surrender her life for the innocent and defenseless life within her. All your other references from the studies and writings of men and Priests mean nothing unless they agree with the Bible. I have seen many of your encyclopedic postings Vasu and they are all just like this one, they show a bunch of copied knowledge with no wisdom of understanding and even while you pretend that you and the democrats have wisdom of this knowledge it only impresses the ignorant because its not wisdom of the truth. Because you come speaking that this knowledge makes it ok convincing others they are fine to commit acts of abortion and the ending of a life you Vasu then become guilty of the blood of each innocent life destroyed by the lies you teach. God yet did surely give you the right to choose, so its your right to decide your own eternity, but He also freely gave wisdom to all when He said “choose life”!

    • You were already debunked on another website for posting the same nonsense by someone that has actually read the bible. You are taking the bible passage out of context and not telling the whole story, deliberately I might add. You are being dishonest.

  8. WASHINGTON (AP) — The ascension of Paula White as an official member of Donald Trump’s White House highlights how closely the president is relying on his inner circle of evangelical Christian supporters as he fights an impeachment probe during his reelection bid — while giving liberal evangelicals a new opening to push back at his administration’s mingling of religion and policymaking.

    White is a televangelist who has sparked division among fellow Christians over her association with the so-called “prosperity gospel,” an assertion that God rewards believers with personal as well as financial success. She’s also frequently identified as personal minister to the president and is now set to become an adviser heading Trump’s Faith and Opportunity Initiative, according to a White House official.

    As recently as the 1980s, when a secular bumper sticker appeared saying, “The one who dies with the most toys wins…” the Christians responded with a bumper sticker of their own, citing Luke 12:15, where Jesus himself says life does not consist of the abundance of one’s possessions. So what happened in the interim? Christians all embraced megachurches and the so-called “prosperity gospel,” reveling in fornication and deriding anyone not “getting it” as a real loser?

    • Vasu, there is no such thing as a liberal evangelical!!! God forbids all of what liberals stand for. But you have no clue because you have absolutely no concept of what the Bible teaches or what a Christian is. HINT…There is ONE KIND of Christian only. You are the real loser, as you have not accepted Jesus as the Lord of your life.

      • Vasu is basically saying you can believe and do whatever you want and still call yourself a Christian which certainly is not backed up by scripture.
        There is no Christian that would condone abortion, or gay marriage, or believe in the Big Bang, or Evolution, or ban prayer in schools, or put the state above God.
        It is impossible to be a Christ follower and vote democrat.

  9. This ILLEGAL law of MURDER and DEATH to the INNOCENT unborn (which is an ABOMINATION as per God’s Word, the Bible, Proverbs 6th chapter, Taking of INNOCENT life) MUST be ABOLISHED! Team Trump and his allies 2020 – KAGA (Keep America Great Again).

  10. I believe abortions only can happen in case of victims and medical conditions that dictates as the only way…I don’t believe it when it’s used in the majority of the cases as birth control remedy, specially when the cost is bare by the tax payers, if I make a mistake in my business and it goes south I don’t expect the federal government to come and rescue me for my mistake.

  11. The Pro-life bunch will jump on anything and back everything they can that could possibly give them the ability to dictate to everyone else around them about what they should or shouldn’t do in their lives. They are just as bad as the crazy left wing nut jobs who are trying to do the same. Just live your lives as you see fit and leave everyone else alone please, it isn’t your job to police the rest of humanity and bend them to your will.

    • Pro-life people aren’t dictating anything to anybody. They are reminding people what God has said. And God does have the right to dictate what is right or wrong. and by the way, law and order in a social setting is necessary for the good of all. Just leaving everyone to do whatever he likes is a good way to get beaten, robbed or killed.

  12. Strange that our Declaration of Independence says we all have the Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Yet barbaric Democrats claim that our unborn children have NO rights to life at all.

    Where will that end? When they’ve slaughtered off all the elderly, disabled and those whose beliefs don’t match theirs? It will be covered under Universal Healthcare for All.

    As far as God’s Word goes, He said “I knew you in the womb”. He knew that person before he was born! If that isn’t life what is? But, you know, Democrats DO NOT believe there is a Creator God so they claim the right to ignore such things.

    If you believe there IS a Creator God and that His Word is valid and you still vote Democrat then you are voting for mass murder. Live with that!

  13. Democrats embrace abortion because they believe in global warming and think the world is overpopulated. Democrats also know it’s mostly indigent single black mothers that get abortions.
    It’s TRUE.

  14. FOLKS, LETS CUT TO THE CHASE:
    If you play, you pay and you are responsible for your actions.
    MURDER IS MURDER!!! I don’t care who you are, you are responsible for your actions. If you are that horny, take a pill or use a condom….
    If you can’t be that responsible for your body, then get sterilized…
    I know that sex is a natural thing and we all have desires and needs, but think of your actions. If you conceive, then you are responsible for that infant you are about to bring into the world, not thinking you are responsible for the killing of a fetus within is immoral and unethical.
    Take a minute before having sex and do something responsible for once in your ugly life. DON’T KILL AN INNOCENT BEING BECAUSE YOU WANT TO PLAY,.,,

  15. The legal gymnastics the Supreme Court went through to legalize MURDER should shame any moral Justice. Indeed, it took an extremely LIBERAL Justice to CHANGE the initial INTENT of our Constitution to justify this baseless interpretation. IF, a mighty big word here, IF this practice is to be recognized, it SHOULD be through an amendment to the basic document, not a “modern view” of what today’s scholar would “like to see”!!!

    • The Supreme Court of the United States did what courts do: hear arguments from the parties to a case and formulate a decision as to which of the sides is most correct. When there is a difficultly of reconciliation, sometimes a court will opt to “split the difference”.

  16. Roe v Wade MUST be reversed. It never had any basis in the Constitution when it was decided. If it isn’t essentially reversed, the Supreme Court has no credibility.

    • ABSOLUTELY=why doesn’t Planned Parenthood give out birth control pills or condoms instead of MURDER? Without GOD, there is NO MORALES!!

  17. AMERICANS are guranteed life with no definition,as to when life begins. This is where the Court must determin when the baby in the womb becomes a person. And that is determined by GOD.

  18. Of course it should be reversed. When passed it was for a term of the first twelve weeks. This has since been horribly abused. The Supreme court said that this would stand until science could prove when life begins. It is proven life begins at conception so according to Roe v Wade abortion is not permitted after conception. As Justice Scalia said, “Where is the outrage?” That alone can overturn this horrific ruling. Well, the outrage is rearing it’s beautiful head at last. Let us pray we can finally return to morality and allow these children to live happily according to our Constitution.

  19. To Kenneth Bottomley: At the time of conception of the elements of a person are there, they are alive, they are only in a progressive state of growth, which will continue until one dies. Already are determined the color of you eyes, the color of your hair, how tall you will be, etc. etc. So abortion kills a living Human being at any time after conception. May God forgive them for their murderous act.

    • james f barry: Aren’t you happy YOUR mother didn’t have the same mind set as yourself??
      How does a innocent life that is being formed ,out of stupidly and laziness of the two parties not taking proper precautions , being killed control crime and poverty? I think you are confused with the massive influx of ILLEGAL aliens trying to storm our borders with these innocent babies that has no voice to speak for them other than people with a heart and soul trying to save them……Shame on you!!

  20. Trouble is the Rich like Roe versus Wade They can have an affair, and then just have the woman wen he makes her pregnant have her abort the baby, and then just be quiet about his affair What she does not know can not hurt him. I have a different, and better Idea. Put the Bible back into our schools.A lot of People back when the Bible was in our schools. They knew that Jesus was watching their every move. They were afraid of the Hell fire that is the end or sinners

  21. Linda, you are right on target with your statements concerning the use of the Correct Birth control methods, instead of ABORTION (MURDER)! These people who just hap-hazzardly go about with their sexual escapades, will one day stand before Jesus Christ and give an account for what they did, unless they Repent and believe in their heart I Cor 15:1-4, and by faith=BELIEVE. Thank you for your stand.

  22. What is this ‘magical’ belief that somehow a living human becomes a BABY just for crossing a LINE. They don’t suddenly change into a baby at that moment…they were already a human baby before that.
    I guess I’m bein too logical, right?

    • Exactly! Except in cases where the mother’s life is in danger (self defense), at or after the point of viability, the only way to deliberately end a pregnancy early without murder is to induce labor or have a C-Section!

  23. Why is abortion the only way to protect a woman’s “health”? Whatever happened to the concept of not having unprotected sex in the first place? There is no justification for aborting life in the womb at any stage from conception to birth, except in rare cases where the choice is to save either the mother’s or the baby’s life where the other cannot be saved. And that should be with clear consent of the parties involved.

          • Which is exactly why, unlike some people, I did not use the pronoun “I” until now. You do not need to tell us things that we already know. Thank you. Now, run along and go luck yourself, instead of wasting away on this pathetic blog.

          • So you are against the use of the pronoun “I”, until you are the one to use it? I wish you no ill; in fact, I hope that you one day change from the pathetic excuse of a person you are now into a worthy human being.

          • Yes, you do wish me ill, you liar. You’re wishing that I would become the lame type of lazy coward that you are, instead of the worthy human being that I currently am. That is truly a shame.

          • It looks like you consider your Internet comments brave and industrious. I disagree, but like I said, I wish you no ill, although I do not consider you anything more than a pathetic excuse for a human being. You don’t have to lower your self esteem in response to a stranger’s opinion, but neither of us is the King of England, so whatever.

  24. I just read this on the internet, it goes to show that people who ever they are, think they can change anything no matter what, to please themself and, others like them.
    Pope Francis: God Has Instructed Me to Revise the Ten Commandments
    JULY 6, 2015 by R. HOBBUS J.D.
    GUAYAQUIL, Ec. – Pope Francis kicked off the start of a three-nation trip across South America today with his first mass, with over a million Ecuadorians in attendance, in the coastal city of Guayaquil. Delivering the mass in Spanish, the Pope spoke about the importance of family in modern society, saying, “It needs to be helped and strengthened, lest we lose our proper sense of the services which society as a whole provides.”

    During his sermon, Pope Francis announced to Christians around the world that God had called upon him, instructing him “to revise the most sacred of texts, the Ten Commandments.” Given to the Israelites by God himself at Mount Sinai, the Commandments include instructions for worship and list several prohibited practices.

    Pope Francis said Christians around the world are “faced with ever-increasing temptations brought on by the evils of modern society.” The Pope said the updated Commandments reflect the changing times and include some minor rewording of the existing rules as well as the addition of two new Commandments.

    The Fourth Commandment, which advocates that proper respect be shown towards one’s parents, has been reworded in order to include children raised by same-sex parents. Pope Francis said the Seventh Commandment, prohibiting adultery and, among other things, homosexuality, has been removed entirely, as instructed by God, in order to extend “God’s grace to all His children.”

    Addressing the inclusion of the new Commandments, which bring the total number to eleven, Pope Francis praised the rapid growth of technology in the digital age but said “progress comes at a price.” The new Fifth Commandment, which replaces the prohibition of adultery, forbids all aspects of genetic engineering and bans the consumption of genetically modified foods.

    Lastly, the Eleventh Commandment disallows personal idolization and the glorification of one’s self over God. Using the Kardashians, a highly publicized celebrity family, as an example, Pope Francis said, “Selfies are an abomination in the eyes of our Lord.”

    A spokesman for the Vatican, Father Federico Lombardi, said the Eleven Commandments are currently being etched into marble by an Italian sculptor and, upon completion, will be unveiled to the world in Saint Peter’s Square following an internationally televised mass

  25. I am not surprised that the pope is rewriting god’s words ( law ) on homosexuals seeing, thats been a ongoing sinful act in the catholic church since the beginning, but claiming god when talking to him is contradicting his own words, saying he has changed his mind to fit today’s society ? GOD DOES NOT ALTER HIS WORDS TO SATISFY US! We honor and obey his laws or pay for are sins come judgment day !!!!

    • Kenneth Bottomley: The Pope is really doing this?? Well, thank GOD I am not a practicing Catholic . No MAN has any right to rewrite the Ten Commandments, even if he’s” claiming” GOD spoke to him! If he’s hearing voices, it must be Satin whispering in his ear. What a sin!! He WILL be punished harshly come Judgment day..

      • Linda M. I am becoming more and more convinced in what the Book Of Revelation is saying, I have seen it all coming true. The country/world has been changing rapidly worse and worser, the past few years, people turning against the church and, supporting sinful acts, GOD HELP US ALL !!!!

        • Kenneth Bottomley; Even though through the ages the translation of the bible has certain passages losing (or misinterpreted) it’s true meanings ,but the basic principles are still there. I have never been a alarmist predicting the end of the world is near. But yes, the book of Revelations has the signs we are supposed to look for and so many have ALREADY come to pass. So I truly believe we ARE in the end times, Kenneth. How long that final time will be is only known to GOD. It saddens me when I look around and I see so much beauty that still remains on Earth, and it will all end. But I know that those of us that have accepted Christ as our personal savior will have an eternity of beauty, peace and we will not experience another death or disease .But still, I believe if we show GOD we are standing up for what’s right and our actions contains HIS grace, we will be allowed more time. Just keep the faith Kenneth and pray that GOD will show us mercy. Be well Kenneth..
          P.S. If there’s any typing errors, I am once again apologizing. I still haven’t gotten a new keyboard. But I will!!!

          • Linda M.: I appreciate your point of view in this matter, I believe your most correct in how you see this. I haven’t noticed anything wrong with your typing.

  26. THE THING ABOUT THIS IS THAT PLANNED PARENT DEATH IS TO BLAME FOR ALOT OF THIS BECAUSE THEY WANT BABIES TO SELL ON THE BLACK MARKET TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO USED AS LAB RATS THEY SAY THE BABIES ARE DEAD NOT TRUE THEY WILL DO WHAT EVER THE CAN TO MAKE MONEY THE CLITONS ARE BIG IN WITH THEM CLINTON HITLER ONE OF THE SAME EVEN VERY TOP SERCRET PLACES IN OUR OWN COUNTRY TO THIS IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE ARE YOU KIDDING ME BUT THEIR ARE WOMEN WHO ARE PAID TO GET PREGNANT AND ACT LIKE THEY HAD ABORTION WHEN THEY JUST SOLD THAT POOR BABY FOR MONEY TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER IT IS SO SAD AND DISGUSTING TO THINK THAT PEOPLE WOULD DO THIS THE DEMORATS ARE TO BLAME OBAMA MADE IT EASIER TO SELL MORE AND MAKE MONEY

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here