Trump just did one thing the Left is going to absolutely hate


Planned Parenthood kills hundreds of thousands of babies every year through abortion.

But after decades of crony politicians bankrolling Planned Parenthood, President Trump is beginning to fight back.

And Trump just did one thing the Left is going to absolutely hate.

One of the most despicable things that Planned Parenthood does is operate using taxpayer dollars.

To millions of Christians, it is already horrible enough that Planned Parenthood is engaging in the horrendous act of abortion, but the fact that taxpayers are also sending them money makes things worse.

Planned Parenthood claims that none of the money they receive from taxpayers goes to abortion.

But the money does go toward other costs at the same clinics that perform abortions.

That is until this week, when President Trump ordered that taxpayer funded clinics stop referring women for abortions.

So in the case of Planned Parenthood, they cannot refer anybody for abortion in any clinic that receives government funds.

This is expected to cost the abortion Goliath tens of millions in taxpayer dollars, as they will need to use separate buildings to provide abortions.

The Daily Caller reports:

The Trump administration declared Monday that taxpayer-funded clinics must stop referring women for abortions effective immediately.

Family planning clinics that refer women for abortions will be stripped of their Title X funding, according to a measure instigated by President Donald Trump’s administration as reported by CBS News.

The Department of Health and Human Services has alerted clinics that they will be enforcing the Trump administration ban, according to CBS.

The rules now require that organizations that perform abortions and make abortion referrals will have to do so in separate buildings from those that receive Title X federal funds – a move could potentially cost Planned Parenthood “tens of millions of federal family planning dollars,” according to Politico.

This move shows how serious President Trump is about the pro-life issue.

For decades, left-wing politicians like Barack Obama have been working overtime to appease the Abortion Lobby.

But Trump is different, and wants none of their support.

Do you consider yourself pro-life?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.


  1. Loading...
  2. The Bible permits abortion. Pro-lifers must become secular.

    Genesis 38:24. Tamar’s pregnancy was proof that she was sexually active. Because she was a widow, without a husband, she was assumed to be a prostitute. Her father-in-law, Judah, ordered that she be burned alive for her crime.

    If Tamar’s fetuses had any value whatsoever, her execution would have been delayed until after their birth. There was no condemnation on Judah for deciding to take this action.

    Exodus 21:22-24. If two men are fighting and one injures a pregnant woman and the fetus is killed, he shall repay her according to the degree of injury inflicted upon *her*,and not the fetus.

    Author Brian McKinley, a born-again Christian, comments:

    “Thus we can see that if the baby is lost, it does not require a death sentence-it is not considered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder and is punished by death.”

    Halacha (Jewish Law) does define when a fetus becomes a nephesh (person), a full-fledged human being, when the head emerges from the womb. Before then, the fetus is considered a “partial-life”; it gains full human status after birth only.

    The Babylonian Talmud (Yevamot 69b) states that: “the embryo is considered to be mere water until the fortieth day.” Afterward, it is considered subhuman until it is born.

    Rashi, the great 12th century commentator on the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud, states clearly of the fetus ‘lav nephesh hu — it is not a person.’

    The Talmud contains the expression, “the thigh of its mother,” i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part and parcel of the pregnant woman’s body.

    This is grounded in Exodus 21:22. That biblical passage outlines the Mosaic Law in a case where a man is responsible for causing a woman’s miscarriage, which kills the fetus.

    If the woman survives, then the perpetrator has to pay a fine to the woman’s husband. If the woman is killed, the perpetrator is also killed. This indicates that the fetus has value, but does not have the status of a person.

    There are two additional passages in the Talmud which shed some light on abortion. They imply that the fetus is considered part of its mother:

    One section states that if a man purchases a cow that is found to be pregnant, then he is owner of both the cow and the fetus.

    Another section states that if a pregnant woman converts to Judaism, that her conversion also applies to her fetus.

    Some Jewish authorities have ruled in specific cases. one case involved a woman who becomes pregnant while nursing a child. Her milk supply would dry up. If the child is allergic to all other forms of nutrition except mother’s milk, then it would starve.

    An abortion would be permitted in this case, a potential person, would be justified to save the life of the child, an actual person.

    Judaism supports abortion access for women. Polls show 90 percent of American Jews supporting abortion rights.

    Pro-life apologists say at least the unborn has *some* value in the Old Testament, if not actual or real personhood. But the New Testament is more permissive than the Old Testament!

    In Christianity, Paul’s gospel displaces Jesus’ gospel. Jesus, a rabbi, repeatedly upheld Mosaic Law (Matthew 5:17-19; Mark 10:17-22; Luke 16:17) as did his apostles (see chapters 10, 15, and 21 of Acts). Paul, however, claims Mosaic Law has been abolished, referring to his previous adherence to the Law as “so much garbage…”

    So even if you could find a verse in the Old Testament indicating concern for the unborn, Paul, and not Jesus, says it’s “garbage.”

    Like animals in contemporary American society, the Bible accords the unborn marginal concern which is often inconsistent at best.

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles. Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality.

    “This is God’s will—your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God.” (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)

    “Make no mistake,” warned Paul, “no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion, no thieves or grabbers or drunkards or slanderers or swindlers, will possess the kingdom of God.” (I Corinthians 6:9-10 [NEB])

    Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12).

    He instructed them to *always* pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)

    Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshiping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14)

    According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)

    Paul doesn’t say anything about abortion in any of his epistles, but would it matter if he had?

    Conservative Christians are quick to condemn anyone preaching a false gospel, but some conservative Christians argue not only that they’re not under Mosaic Law, but that they don’t have to follow Paul, either, because Paul claims the risen Jesus said to him three times “…my grace is sufficient for thee…” and they take this biblical verse as a license to do as they please.

    If their view prevails, then:

    What basis do pro-life Christians have for prohibiting abortion?

    Doesn’t “three times…” justify choice?

    Secular pro-life arguments are religion-neutral and thus applicable to everyone, including atheists and agnostics.

    The pro-life movement ALREADY HAS the support of organized religion.

    Instead of preaching to the choir, i.e., wasting time with religion, pro-lifers should focus on embryology and prenatal development, DNA, RNA, etc. to make their case to our mainstream secular society.

  3. God cares for unborn children as He cares for animals. The case against abortion is largely extra-canonical and theological, not Scriptural (e.g., the writings of the early church fathers). The earliest Christians were vegetarians as well as pacifists. Clemens Prudentius, the first Christian hymn writer, in one of his hymns exhorted his fellow Christians not to pollute their hands and hearts by the slaughter of innocent cows and sheep, and pointed to the variety of nourishing and pleasant foods obtainable without blood-shedding. Secular scholar Keith Akers concludes in his 1986 (updated) edition of A Vegetarian Sourcebook: “But many others, both orthodox and heterodox, testified to the vegetarian origins of Christianity. Both Athanasius and his opponent Arius were strict vegetarians. Many early church fathers were vegetarian, including Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Heironymus, Boniface, and John Chrysostom… Vegetarianism is at the heart of Christianity.”

    St. Richard of Wyche, a vegetarian, was moved by the sight of animals taken to slaughter: “Poor innocent little creatures. If you were reasoning beings and could speak, you would curse us. For we are the cause of your death, and what have you done to deserve it?” St. Francis of Assisi taught: “If you have men who will exclude any of God’s creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity, you will have men who will deal likewise with their fellow men.” St. Filippo Neri spent his life protecting and rescuing living creatures. A vegetarian, he could not bear to pass a butcher’s shop. “Ah,” he exclaimed, “if everyone were like me, no one would kill animals!”

    “Thanks be to God!” wrote John Wesley, founder of Methodism, to the Bishop of London in 1747. “Since the time I gave up the use of flesh-meats and wine, I have been delivered from all physical ills.” Wesley was a vegetarian for spiritual reasons as well. Wesley based his vegetarianism on the biblical prophecies concerning the Kingdom of Peace, where “on the new earth, no creature will kill, or hurt, or give pain to any other.” Wesley taught that animals “shall receive an ample amends for all their present sufferings.” Wesley further taught that animals will attain heaven: in the “general deliverance” from the evils of this world, animals would be given “vigor, strength and swiftness… to a far higher degree than they ever enjoyed.” Wesley urged parents to educate their children about compassion towards animals: “I am persuaded you are not insensible of the pain given to every Christian, every humane heart, by those savage diversions, bull-baiting, cock-fighting, horse-racing, and hunting.”

    The Quakers have a long history of advocating kindness towards animals. In 1795, the Society of Friends (Quakers) in London passed a resolution condemning sport hunting: “…let our leisure be employed in serving our neighbor, and not in distressing, for our amusement, the creatures of God.” John Woolman (1720-1772) was a Quaker preacher and abolitionist who traveled throughout the American colonies attacking slavery and cruelty to animals. Woolman wrote that he was “early convinced in my mind that true religion consisted in an inward life, wherein the heart doth love and reverence God the Creator and learn to exercise true justice and goodness, not only toward all men, but also toward the brute creatures… Where the love of God is verily perfected… a tenderness toward all creatures made subject to us will be experienced, and a care felt in us that we do not lessen that sweetness of life in the animal creation which the great Creator intends for them.”

    Joshua Evans (1731-1798), a Quaker, said reverence for life was the moral basis of his vegetarianism: “I considered that life was sweet in all living creatures, and taking it away became a very tender point with me… I believe my dear Master has been pleased to try my faith and obedience by teaching me that I ought no longer to partake of anything that had life.” The “Quaker poet” and abolitionist John Greenleaf Whittier (1807-1892), wrote: “The sooner we recognize the fact that the mercy of the Almighty extends to every creature endowed with life, the better it will be for us as men and Christians.”

    The founder and first secretary of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), the Reverend Arthur Broome, an Anglican priest, endured poverty and jail for the cause of animals. The RSPCA was originally founded as a Christian Society “entirely based on the Christian Faith, and on Christian Principles,” sponsoring sermons on humane education in churches in London. Its first Prospectus spoke of the need to extend Christian charity and benevolence to the animals, and was signed by many leading 19th century Christians including William Wilberforce, Richard Martin, G.A. Hatch, J. Bonner, and Dr. Heslop.

    General William Booth (1829-1912), founder of the Salvation Army, practiced and advocated vegetarianism. Booth never officially condemned flesh eating as cruelty to animals nor as gluttony, but taught that abstinence from luxury is helpful to the cause of Christian charity. “It is a great delusion to suppose that flesh of any kind is essential to health,” he insisted.

    Although Seventh Day Adventists are known to promote vegetarianism, nonsmoking, and nondrinking for health and nutrition, church founder Ellen White taught kindness to animals is a Christian duty. She urged the faithful to: “Think of the cruelty that meat eating involves, and its effect on those who inflict and those who behold it. How it destroys the tenderness with which we should regard these creatures of God!”

    “To stand for Christ is to stand against the evil of cruelty inflicted on those who are weak, vulnerable, unprotected, undefended, morally innocent, and in that class we must unambiguously include animals. There is something profoundly Christ-like about the innocent suffering of animals. Look around you and see the faces of Christ in the billions of innocent animals suffering in factory farms, in laboratories, in abattoirs, in circuses and in animals hunted for sport.”

    —Reverend Andrew Linzey, contemporary Anglican priest, and author of several books on animal rights and Christianity

  4. Don’t abort – give the baby to adoption agencies and to pro-lifers to raise
    there are many childless couples that would be glad to raise the child!! !! !! !!

  5. That was a great move! Abortion is an Abomination according to God’s Word (Proverbs 6:16 through 19), since it is the taking of innocent lives of the unborn. Why not start adopting instead, streamlining the process and bring the costs down? There are PLENTY of loving parents who would LOVE to have that little bundle of joy! . . . especially childless couples. This time money would be used for SAVING lives and bringing love into people’s lives instead of murdering them. Trump and his allies 2020.

  6. If all pro-lifers are required to pay taxes, then taxes should not be used for clinics that support abortions. Let those that favor abortions support Planned parenthood and other clinic that support abortions. I agree with President Trump no tax money for abortion.

  7. I have no problem with aborting future mooching libs as long as it done before 16 weeks. After that it is adoption and sterilize the Mother.

  8. This concern about Human Life & unborn murdered babies from somebody who once boasted that “he could commit Murder by shooting an Innocent person & get away with it”. What a Laughable, Phony Joke regarding that Oval Office Two Faced Pile of GUTTER TRASH in Human Form!

  9. This is great news, and we should all thank the president for his steadfast pro-life support. Planned Parenthood has been deceiving us with their insistence that tax dollars are not used in abortions, only for family planning and other medical procedures. This is a first step, let us hope there is more to come.

  10. First off, the Left is automatically opposed to anything that President Trump says or does. But I agree with the headline that they will REALLY HATE this, because he has found a way to tie a very tight knot in the legal loophole the abortion industry, particularly “Planned Parenthood”, has been using to funnel taxpayer money into their own coffers.

  11. go back and read your Bible. Tamar was not killed and her line (the line of Juda) lead to the Messiah. So the life in her was preserved and did not die.

    Genesis 38:25-30 New International Version (NIV)
    25 As she was being brought out, she sent a message to her father-in-law. “I am pregnant by the man who owns these,” she said. And she added, “See if you recognize whose seal and cord and staff these are.”
    26 Judah recognized them and said, “She is more righteous than I, since I wouldn’t give her to my son Shelah.” And he did not sleep with her again.
    27 When the time came for her to give birth, there were twin boys in her womb. 28 As she was giving birth, one of them put out his hand; so the midwife took a scarlet thread and tied it on his wrist and said, “This one came out first.” 29 But when he drew back his hand, his brother came out, and she said, “So this is how you have broken out!” And he was named Perez.[a] 30 Then his brother, who had the scarlet thread on his wrist, came out. And he was named Zerah.[b]

    Exodus 21:22-24 New International Version (NIV)
    22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely[a] but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

    It specifies that “if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life” the verse does not specify if it is the life of the child or not

  12. Any organization that gets tax payer money should not be able to make political contributions. As the tax money comes from all tax payers and they only contribute to one party. If they receive tax dollars and want to
    give to politics they should be required to give equally to both parties, as they take from us all.

  13. God bless president Trump. These baby murderers should be completely put out of business.A baby survives an abortion They lay it on a table and watch it die.Horrible people.Why are the babies killed instead of putting them up for adoption.I cannot believe this is happening in my country./

  14. Taxpayer monies that are not used for abortions will probably be used to fund incidental expenses such as all the different insurances they have to maintain and other non abortion related expenses. That will let the profits they receive off the abortions to finance the abortion related expenses. I don’t see why the funds are not cutoff all together and be do with it. These murder clinics need to be shut down, period.

  15. V. Merti argues that animals should not be killed. Is not human life more important than animal life? The fetus has a heart beat very early in the pregnancy. The heartbeat is defined as life, and when it stops beating the person is dead. That argument alone says the Fetus is alive very early in the pregnancy and
    it is human. So destroying the fetus is ending life of what is a human being.
    By the constitution, any living person is protected by that amendment whether he be an adult or a living fetus.
    I say that Abortion is nothing but murder. Jesus said when interpreting the 1o commandments, You shall not murder. God complained about his people destroying innocent life. He indicated that the destruction of Jerusalem and the captivity in Babylon was punishment for filling the streets of Jerusalem with innocent blood.

  16. I think the government should not be part of this issue at all. The option should be available but not the only choice to be done. Such as adoptions or other options. I THINK IT SHOULD BE BETWEEN THE WOMAN AND HER DOCTOR FOR MAKING A CHOICE ON HOW TO PROCEED. To me it is not a person till birth. If the possibly that it maybe a deformed or disabled child then that option should be available. No I do not think LATE IN THE TERM IS RIGHT. I believe the first three months. But after that it is to dangerous for both the woman and the child. Why I a child you don’t want. I know a lot of you will not agree with this. For that I am sorry. Having a child will change your life for ever. There is no going back later. Is the woman willing to take care that child or will the child suffer?

  17. Should it then be between a woman and her Psychiatrist whether she should terminate her sometimes nasty husband?

  18. Show the link or video that shows this claim you are making. I doubt very much you can substantiate it. Just a typical Snowflake/Liberal/Leftist spewing false accusations. Close your pie hole.

  19. This Steven Sipes again. Planned Parenthood is a business. It should stand on its own. The government should not be involved. The government should NOT FUND IT. That is on its clients for any of the services they offer.

  20. Anyone VOTING for a pro-abortion candidate is just as guilty as the person actually performing the abortion.

  21. Betty you are disgusting. I do not understand how the left can be so haeful & without God. God will bless & love you regardless of your mouth & thoughts Betty. God bless President Trump.

  22. President Trump is a bad ass yet again!!! He is the only President to ever have the ball’s to stand up against the Pro Abortion movement! And this is with an Election coming up next year! He is fearless! He is also the only President to ever have the ball’s to put the American Embassy in Jerusalem where it belongs! And this is in addition to his promise to eliminate the Unconstitutional Johnson Amendment 501c3! To say nothing of what he is doing at the Border . President Trump not only has my respect and thanks , But he also has my vote in 2020!

  23. Vasu…The Bible DOES NOT permit the murder of babies in or out of the womb!!!!!! You have no clue what the Bible teaches. It is just a bunch of words to you. You have NOT applied what you read. If you did, you would know Jesus as your Savior. But you have rejected Him. sad

  24. Vasu, you have no clue what Jesus or Paul teaches. Try actually STUDYING the Bible instead of just reading it.



  27. Suzanne, Yes the Bible was written by men but it was inspired by God. For it says in 2 Timothy 3:16, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction , for instruction in righteousness That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.” So you have it wrong.

  28. ‪Expose, Boycott, Sue, prosecute and bring to justice all these deep state treasonous Godless NAZI commie liberal demoncrats and RINOs post-haste,Patriots! Drain the rat infested swamp President Trump!‬!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here