This teen magazine is in hot water after getting caught brainwashing kids on a sick far-Left issue

65

The far-Left is circling over our children like vultures.

They want nothing more than to force them to adopt the same deviant views they hold.

And now this teen magazine is in hot water after getting caught brainwashing kids on a sick far-Left issue.

A magazine like Teen Vogue, directed at a teenage audience, should probably avoid talking about far-Left issues like abortion.

But in a recent article they blasted President Trump for his efforts to ban Title X funds from going toward healthcare centers that provide or refer patients for abortion.

They claim Trump is “quashing reproductive rights,” while entirely ignoring the fact that abortion kills a living person.

Teen Vogue even mirrors a statement from acting Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGillis where she claims Trump is denying women the right “to make their own heath care decisions.”

NewsBusters reports:

Teen Vogue told progressive-minded youngins’ that the Trump administration took a “giant leap forward” in quashing reproductive rights by banning “Title X family planning providers from referring patients for abortion care.” This means Planned Parenthood would have to cut out it’s abortion procedures and establish healthcare clinics without abortion facilities in order to stay on the Title X government dole. On August 19, PP pulled itself out of the government-funded program rather than distance itself from abortion.

The outlet reiterated acting Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGillis’ statement that “We will not be bullied into withholding abortion information from our patients. Our patients deserve to make their own health care decisions, not to be forced to have Donald Trump or Mike Pence make those decisions for them.” Sure, Planned Parenthood is ever the victim, and progressive kiddie outlets behoove themselves to parrot the lie that President Trump is inflicting harm on women’s rights. Too bad that’s not the truth of the matter.

This is how insane the Left is becoming.

They are infiltrating magazines meant for young kids and pushing their radical far-Left agenda.

Do you think the radical Left should leave children alone?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

65 COMMENTS

  1. Loading...
  2. You’d think the unborn-right-to-lifers would immediately understand the animal-right-to-lifers! The case for animal rights should be readily understandable to the millions of Americans opposed to abortion on demand.

    “Although I may disagree with some of its underlying principles,” writes pro-life Democrat Karen Swallow Prior, “there is much for me, an anti-abortion activist, to respect in the animal rights movement. Animal rights activists, like me, have risked personal safety and reputation for the sake of other living beings. Animal rights activists, like me, are viewed by many in the mainstream as fanatical wackos, ironically exhorted by irritated passerby to ‘Get a Life!’ Animal rights activists, like me, place a higher value on life than on personal comfort and convenience, and in balancing the sometimes competing interests of rights and responsibilities, choose to err on the side of compassion and nonviolence.”

    The animal rights movement, representing a cross-section of mainstream secular American society, is NOT “officially pro-choice,” but IS divided on abortion. In a 1992 interview on Dennis Prager’s conservative talk show, when specifically asked about the animal rights position on abortion, Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), admitted, “We’re divided.”

    Former television game show host Bob Barker is a conservative Republican and an animal activist. Tony LaRussa of the Animal Rescue Foundation is a political conservative. Vegan labor leader Cesar Chavez was pro-life. Vegan civil rights leader Dick Gregory was pro-life. Former Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy, a devout pacifist, has expressed opposition to abortion, and in the 1980s was critical of Reverend Jesse Jackson for having changed sides on the issue.

    Dixie Mahy, past president of the San Francisco Vegetarian Society, has been vegetarian for sixty years, vegan for forty of those sixty years, and identifies herself as pro-life-and-pro-animal Matthew Scully, a conservative Catholic and former speechwriter for George W. Bush identifies himself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.” Catholic Concern for Animals is pro-life-and-pro-animal. Reverend Frank Hoffman’s http://www.all-creatures.org Christian vegan website is pro-life-and-pro-animal Compassion for animals is a fundamental tenet of the Baha’i faith, which endorses vegetarianism, says abortion is more a matter of individual conscience, but concludes, without taking a position on abortion, life should not be destroyed.

    John Stuart Mill wrote: “The reasons for legal intervention in favor of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves — the animals.”

    Animals are like children. Henry Bergh, founder of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), successfully prosecuted a woman for child abuse in 1873, at a time when children had no legal protection, under the then currently existing animal protection statutes. This case started the child-saving crusade around the world.

    In Christianity and the Rights of Animals, the Reverend Dr. Andrew Linzey writes: “In some ways, Christian thinking is already oriented in this direction. What is it that so appalls us about cruelty to children or oppression of the vulnerable, but that these things are betrayals of relationships of special care and special trust? Likewise, and even more so, in the case of animals who are mostly defenseless before us.”

    When told the animal rights movement is divided on abortion, Serrin Foster, Executive Director of Feminists For Life, said understandingly, “The Children’s Defense Fund is also divided on abortion.” Feminists For Life has many vegetarians and vegans. Serrin identifies herself as a vegetarian.

    From 1992 through 2003, James Dawson, raised Catholic and now a Buddhist, published Live and Let Live, a pro-life / animal rights / libertarian ‘zine. The ancient eastern reincarnationist religions Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism all predate Christianity, all oppose abortion, all teach ahimsa, or nonviolence towards humans and animals alike to the point of vegetarianism, all are vegan-friendly, and all teach that abortion and war are the karma for killing animals, and that therefore, we cannot end abortion nor bring about world peace until first we abolish the killing of animals.

    This knowledge, however, does not rest with everyone. Not all pro-life-and-pro-animal people advocate the reincarnationist strategy for ending abortion and bringing about world peace. Shay Van Vlieman, founder of Vegans For Life in the late ’90s, said she doesn’t expect to see a vegan president in her lifetime: she would just be glad to elect a president who will work to overturn Roe v. Wade. And she insists she is not a Republican, but a libertarian!

    During the late 1990s, Rachel MacNair, a Quaker pacifist, feminist, vegan, past president of Feminists For Life, moderated an email list for pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans. Rachel is now a psychology professor, and has written several books on nonviolence. In 1998, the Animals Agenda ran a cover story on the debate within the animal rights movement over abortion. Vegan congressman Dennis Kucinich (D – Ohio), one of the most liberal members of Congress, was pro-life throughout most of his political career.

    Pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans are found within the “consistent-ethic” movement: pro-lifers opposed to capital punishment. A significant number of “consistent-ethic” Christians were / are vegetarian or vegan: Rose Evans, Ruth Enero, Rachel MacNair, Albert Fecko, Carol Crossed, Bill Samuel, Mary Krane Derr, Mary Rider, Father John Dear, etc.

    Mary Rider, a practicing Catholic, wrote in Harmony: Voices for a Just Future, a “consistent-ethic” periodical in 2002:

    “So we teach our children to walk softly on the earth and to embrace nonviolence as the only legitimate means of conflict resolution, on both a personal and a global level. We are aware of the excessive, privileged life we lead as educated, first world U.S. citizens and of the responsibilities to which our privilege calls us. We try to live simply. We eat low on the food chain. We try to buy nothing new… We try to respect all life and carry that message forward in all we do… Because we value people and relationships over things… First world consumption kills people around the world… Pollution, environmental devastation, corrupt governments, war, sweatshops… all are a are a result of our desire to buy more at a lower price… We believe each person has a right to live a valued and respected life free from hunger and discrimination…”

    The threat of overpopulation is frequently used to justify abortion as birth control. On a vegan diet, however, the world could easily support a human population several times its present size. The world’s cattle alone consume enough to feed over 8.7 billion humans. Even if abortion advocates argue shifting to a plant-based diet, a vegan diet, isn’t enough to stave off overpopulation, in light of the data showing the depletion of energy, food, fresh water, land space, raw materials and resources as well as the heavy contribution to air and water pollution, deforestization, and global warming caused by a meat-centered diet, how do abortion advocates — warning about overpopulation consuming the world’s resources — justify consuming animal products?

    If vegetarianism were merely about “fit” or following a peculiar set of “dietary laws” why are pro-lifers offended by pro-choice vegetarians and pro-choice vegans? Clearly, they’re offended because they know vegetarianism involves the animals’ right to life, and thus these pro-choicers appear to value animal life over human life under some circumstances. And issues like animal experimentation, circuses, and fur have nothing to do with diet, eating, nor food, but do involve the animals’ right to life. Leonardo Da Vinci, Count Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas Gandhi, George Bernard Shaw, Susan B. Anthony, Percy Shelley, Rosa Parks, etc. were all vegetarian, and none of them were Jewish nor Muslim.

    For Love of Animals: Christian Ethics, Consistent Action offers an introduction to animal rights ethics within Christianity alongside directly related sanctity-of-life issues, like the possible rights of unborn children. The book’s foreword is written by Mary Eberstadt, senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC, a Catholic who identifies herself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.”

    Author Charles Camosy responds to criticisms from academicians Peter Singer and Lynn White, Jr., that the misinterpretation of “human dominion” (versus compassionate stewardship) is responsible for the current ecological crisis. Camosy indicates that Christianity cannot be blamed if humans with their imperfections distort their own religious teachings, that Christianity did not give rise to the industrial revolution, and that real Christianity — as it was meant to be practiced — is at odds with market-driven ethics and mass consumerism (a point made decades ago by liberal Protestant theologian Dr. Harvey Cox). Camosy concludes: “I became convinced that, if I wanted to be authentically and consistently pro-life, I should give up eating meat.” Dozens of books have been written on Christianity and animal rights. Camosy merely provides an overview of animal ethics in Christianity.

    Steve Kaufman, head of the Christian Vegetarian Association, was raised Jewish, and is now serving in the United Church of Christ, America’s largest pro-choice Protestant denomination. Steve expressed interest in Democrats For Life, his only reservation was whether Democrats For Life favors criminalizing abortion. Some animal advocates and activists (like Catholic vegan columnist Colman McCarthy) oppose abortion, but don’t think criminalization is the answer.

    In 2004, on the Democrats For Life email list, Maria Krasinski mentioned a poll which found animal activists evenly divided on abortion. This either indicates animal rights really are a bipartisan cause which conservatives can support alongside liberals, or it indicates many liberals are uncomfortable with abortion!

    In 2014, Kristen Day of Democrats For Life said: “Roughly a third of the Democratic Party is pro-life. And while many do not call themselves liberal, they share the values which seem to identify with liberalism, particularly a commitment to helping the vulnerable and providing a social safety net.”

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

  3. Here in the United States, it wasn’t that long ago that pro-lifers were discriminated against on the basis of their religious identity.

    UC Berkeley law professor John T. Noonan, Jr., a Catholic, describes the discrimination pro-lifers faced from fellow Christians as well as from mainstream secular American society in his 1979 book, A Private Choice: Abortion in America in the Seventies.

    In her essay “Life and Peace,” Juli Loesch wrote that when she spoke out against abortion at an antinuclear gathering, she:

    “…tried to present a meticulous *secular* case against abortion. I marshalled all the scientific evidence… I followed it up with the most basic principle found in every human ethical system… do not do to others what you would not like done to you.

    “This was rewarded by a brief silence, which was broken by a single question:

    ‘Are you a Catholic?… Well, then. You’re imposing your religious beliefs…’

    “And, therefore, I suppose, I lose.”

    Pro-life literature similarly relates that in the late 1970s, Bill Moyer, a Christian minister, who after Walter Cronkite is perhaps the most trusted name in television journalism, was doing a special on abortion for Public Television. He spoke about a shrill minority trying to impose their views on the rest of our pluralistic society — a secular democracy. Behind him loomed a statue of Jesus and a Catholic church, but it could just as easily have been a born again church or a fundamentalist church.

    In 1986, on USENET, John Morrow, a student at Rutgers University, was making secular arguments on behalf of the unborn, like, “Would you kill someone in a coma if you knew within nine months he or she would be awake?”

    When it was revealed that John Morrow was a *Christian*, Russ Cage, one of John’s most visible pro-choice opponents on USENET said, “The truth is out! John is a Christian!” as if John Morrow’s religious identity somehow discredited his views.

    In the late 1980s, on the police drama Cagney & Lacey, the character of Christine Cagney (played by actress Sharon Gless) expresses her opposition to abortion as a Catholic. At the end of the episode, the police detectives discover a woman that died from self-abortion, and Christine Cagney realizes whatever one’s own personal religious beliefs might be, abortion must be kept legal at all costs, because without access to safe, legal abortion, women die.

    (Whether legal or illegal, the unborn children always die in abortion.)

    The abortion issue was repeatedly framed NOT as a secular and nonsectarian civil rights issue — the possible rights of the unborn — which applies to all of mankind — including atheists and agnostics — but dismissed as someone’s “religious belief.”

    Now that pro-lifers in the United States have some political power, they’re dismissing animal rights as someone else’s “religious belief.”

    Animal rights are a nonsectarian civil rights issue that applies to all of mankind — including atheists and agnostics. Pro-lifers are intellectually dishonest when they frame the issue of animal rights as someone else’s “religious belief” which they think doesn’t apply to them… they fail to realize many people see opposition to abortion as someone else’s “religious belief,” too!

    Juli Loesch in her essay from the ’70s, “Life and Peace” made a secular case against abortion at an antinuclear gathering, and rather than respond to her argument, they focused solely on her religious identity, as if to discredit her.

    Similarly, I can cite data from John Robbins, Jeremy Rifkin, PETA, the Worldwatch Institute, etc. but rather than respond to the facts and figures being presented, I’m questioned about my religious identity: do we “work” for our salvation, do we worship in churches or temples, do we refer to sinners as “dogs” or with half a dozen different animal words, etc.?

    Animal rights should not be solely aligned with a particular political party. Neither should they be tied to a particular religion.

    As I told Dr. Richard Schwartz (author, Judaism and Vegetarianism) via email in 1997: arguing as some Christians do that animal rights and vegetarianism are solely “Jewish” concerns is like saying, “It’s only wrong to own a slave if you’re a Quaker.”

    No. Suffering and injustice concern us all. Like the abolition of slavery or the emancipation of women, animal rights and vegetarianism are moral absolutes and apply to everyone, including atheists and agnostics.

    Richard agreed with me that churches should have animal issues at the top of their agenda as well.

    Adolf Hitler thought Albert Einstein’s scientific discoveries were mere “Jewish science” and thus not applicable to gentiles. This is the mentality of meat-eating Christians towards vegetarianism, which they regard as a sectarian (like circumcision) dietary restriction (like “keeping kosher”), rather than as a universal ethic for all mankind (like abstaining from cannibalism).

    Meat-eating Christians relegating animal rights and vegetarianism solely to Judaism are thus as bigoted as Hitler.

    The sad irony here is a lot of liberals see abortion as sectarian, too! They dismiss it as a “Catholic issue” or a fundamentalist Christian issue or say if you’re not born again, you don’t have to be pro-life.

    If vegetarianism were solely about “fit” or following a peculiar set of “dietary laws” why would pro-lifers be offended by pro-choice vegetarians and vegans?

    They’re offended because THEY KNOW vegetarianism involves the animals’ right to life, and thus these pro-choicers appear to value animal life over human life under some circumstances.

    And issues like animal experimentation, circuses, and fur have nothing to do with diet, eating, nor food, but DO involve the animals’ right to life.

    Sometimes being lighthearted gets the point across to Christians that vegetarianism is not about “dietary laws” but about the animals’ right to life, like Steve Martin in the ’70s asking, “How many polyesters did you have to kill to make that suit?”

    Leonardo Da Vinci, Count Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas Gandhi, George Bernard Shaw, Percy Shelley, Susan B. Anthony, etc. were all vegetarian, and none of them were Jewish nor Muslim.

    At the end of 2007, shortly before moving to Israel, Pete Cohon of Veggie Jews in San Francisco said to me, “PETA’s not Jewish.”

    When I told Jim Frey of Berkeley Pro-Life that animal issues are secular and nonsectarian and thus applicable to *everyone* including atheists and agnostics, he said, “Well, just like with abortion.”

    Pro-lifers must not play a sectarian game with animal activists. Saying, ” *Your* religion says it’s wrong to kill animals, mine doesn’t…” is pointless when someone from a differing denomination could just as easily say, “Your religion says it’s wrong to kill the unborn, mine doesn’t.” There are pro-choice Protestant denominations, like the United Church of Christ.

    As an animal advocate and a secularist, I’ve never understood the attempts of pro-life Christians to unsuccessfully deflect the issues of animal rights and vegetarianism by depicting them solely as someone else’s “religious belief” which they think doesn’t apply to them.

    A lot of people look at abortion that way, too, you know!

    Claiming, “Your religion says it’s wrong to kill animals — mine doesn’t…” is pointless when someone from another denomination could just as easily say, “Your religion says it’s wrong to kill the unborn — mine doesn’t…”

    On the other hand, perhaps pro-life Christians *do* see the abortion issue as sectarian.

    My friend Ruth once told me when she was doing sidewalk counseling outside an abortion clinic with a couple of other Christians, these Christians were saying to her:

    “We only want to prevent *Christian* women from having abortions…”

    “I guess that leaves me to minister to the pagan!” said Ruth lightheartedly.

  4. Can you imagine 18th century Christian slaveholders telling an 18th century secular abolitionist organization like People for the Ethical Treatment of Negroes, “We don’t need to free our slaves. That’s ‘good work.’ We don’t have to work for our salvation.” ?

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Negroes responds by quoting a biblical verse against slavery, “You shall not surrender to his master a slave who has taken refuge with you.’ (Deuteronomy 23:15)

    And the Christian slaveholders respond, pointing their fingers at their noses, yawning, and sticking their legs out mimicking a dog taking a leak, “That’s Old Testament. We don’t have to do that any more. Jesus may have repeatedly upheld every jot and tittle of the Law (Matthew 5:17-20; Mark 10:17-22; Luke 16:17), as did his direct disciples (see chapters 10, 15, and 21 of Acts), but Paul says the Law is abolished. Paul refers to his previous adherence to the Law as ‘so much garbage.’ Paul says if anyone has any confidence in the Law, ‘I am ahead of him.’ And the proof is that Paul himself returned a runaway slave to his master, contradicting Deuteronomy 23:15. So we Christian slaveholders are ahead of you secular abolitionists, ahead of social progress. Abolition is ‘so much garbage.’ It’s ‘good work.’ Paul claims the risen Jesus told him three times, ‘…my grace is sufficient for thee…’ We don’t have to do anything for our salvation. We don’t need to free our slaves!’

    I’m surprised pro-choice Christians aren’t using the arguments pro-lifers use to deny rights to animals (above) to deny rights to the unborn!

    “I have no doubt,” wrote Henry David Thoreau, “that it is part of the destiny of the human race in its gradual development to leave off the eating of animals, as surely as the savage tribes have left off eating each other when they came into contact with the more civilized.”

  5. vasu…GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE NOT WANTED. You know NOTHING at all about Christianity. You do not even know what a Christian is. That is very obvious.

  6. Why don’t we focus on teaching people to be pro-active instead of reactive? If women are FAITHFULLY using birth control, and men are using condoms, this is pro-active. There would be few unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. People need to learn to think past the nose on the end of their face and think about what the consequences of their actions might be.

  7. Go away, Wasu. You need to get a job. In your futile attempts to show your intelligence, you only show your hypocrisy.

  8. The Magazine should be sued. I have not replied to this before! As I just said I have not responded to this issue!!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. This magazine is merely an outreach of the DumboCrap party! Re-elect President Trump in November 2020! MAGA!!

  10. You are a POS, BJ! What Vasu said is informative if you had the brain power to read it, you moronic idiot! He has the right to speak. If anyone needs to go away it is you. BTW I am a proud pro-lifer, so get a life!

  11. What can be PROVEN to be TRUE from watching an Ultrasound video of an abortion:

    The Fetus ACTIVELY tries to move away from the probing forceps in an attempt to evade them.

    The Fetus KNOWS FEAR.
    The Fetus KNOWS PAIN.

    Neither response is apparent on the part of the mother.

    TWO SEPARATE ENTITIES!

  12. note to site Moderators.

    You really need to limit the Cut & Paste comments to “less than” 1000 page books.

  13. Abortion should be required for all democrats. If so we would have no more asses akin to Pelosi, Nadler, Schumer and their group of fools.

  14. If women want to play the game and dance, they are going to have to pay the piper. With all of the birth control available there should be no need for abortions. Women fought for equal rights and lowered their standard. Well, you stepped off of the pedestal. Now you have become sluts!

  15. The first functioning organ is the heart. The moment the heart starts beating, the fetus becomes a human being. Therefore, abortion is murder. The parent(s) (and doctors) should be charged with that along with other crimes.

    Liberals hate facts!

  16. That teen magazine should be SUED INTO Poverty! . . . And SHUT Down for good. The Far Left agenda is run by HYPER REPROBATES who will stop at NOTHING to destroys people’s lives to advance their SICK, PERVERTED agenda. All they have is nothing but PERVERSION, hate and VITRIOL for all things Godly and good – right out of SODOM and GOMORRAH . . . Team Trump and his allies 2020.

  17. Hey patrick (or is it patricia?), both you and vasu demonstrate exactly what an IQ of MINUS 100 represents. Guess you lost your one and only brain cell when your mother tried to abort you. Too bad she didn’t succeed, eh ?

  18. Parents! Teach your children your values. Protect and defend your children. Immorality takes its form to destroy the family, faith, moral virtue and the health and freedom of our youth and family.

    Use the words correctly, teach your children…
    Adultery not affair
    Homosexual not gay
    Lesbian, fornication, effeminate, and so on.
    Teach, protect and nurture you children.

  19. The sickness continues. Teen Vogue offices should be doused with a flammable liquid, and torched. What they are throwing in our kid’s faces is reprehensible. They are part of the twisted, sick, warped lib media…..run by sickos and gays….bent on destroying the fabric of the family, our culture, our history. They all need to be eradicated like the vermin they are. It is time for the silent majority to step up to the plate, and knock a grand slam……..sending all these animals out to left field.

  20. Patrick…What I said is the TRUTH!!! But you have no concept what truth is. . She is NOT a Christian so she has no clue what she is talking about when she speaks of Christians or the Bible. They are just words that she can use to suit her agenda. Informative???? All she does is cut and paste the same things over and over. There is nothing wrong with my brain. But yours is very questionable if you believe what she says. For starters, there is no such thing as a pro-choice (pro-murder Christian). A Christian follows Jesus and His teachings and He forbids murdering a baby.

  21. Patrick…I have a life and a very good one. So you are a pro-lifer. Good for you but that doesn’t mean that you are intelligent and it is obvious from your sick name-calling that you are not.

  22. She does that on almost every comment section. She is extremely irritating. She must not have anything else to do with her life. sad.

  23. I used my Delta miles to get some magazines like two years ago, and they’re still sending the same mags even though I never paid a dime. The left is desperate to promote their deviant ideologies no matter what. I noticed the last issue of Shape magazine (supposed to be about exercise and food recipes) got lefty on me as well! Lol that ended up in the trash. Every other page had some type of man-bashing crap in it all while telling me I need to become more of a feminist idiot like the editors of the trash magazine. I’m so sick of the fascist left.

  24. bj; So true ! Please know this Vasu is paid to come these sites just to annoy and try to brainwash us. Which we all know isn’t working. It’s a he by the way. He will not stop or go away. This is what evil Leftists do. Nothing productive. Just spread their lies and cause disruption. So please don’t upset yourself about him. You know GOD and you honor him. That’s all that matters…..

  25. Patrick: There was no reason to be that rude and call bj a POS. Quite frankly, Vasu is nothing more then a paid robot spewing the Leftist propaganda. And I’m so happy to hear you are pro- choice. Next time you see your mother, thank her for being a conservative and not aborting you!!!

  26. Thanks Linda! So it is a he. Ha! He is very misnamed. I just looked up the meaning of the name Vasu and it said “brilliance”.

  27. CA Mom…I also had that with a magazine I no longer wanted to subscribe to. I just kept getting it long after the expiration date. Never gave a thought as to why.

  28. Jesus, Vasu when are you going to realize that when allllllll you do is cut and past LOOOOOOOOOG lists of irrelevant or biased BS MOST People SCROLL RIGHT PAST IT AND DO NOT READ IT!!!!
    Try using your own- concise, and pointed opinions and information and Maybe people would actually read what you have to say.

  29. He has the right to speak YES this is a Free Country with a First Amendment- but Vasu is NOT speaking he is spreading propaganda and using other peoples words. If he Wants to Speak- Let him use his own words not go and promote his leftwing anti-Christian bias!
    Odd he never attacks Jews or Muslims for beliving the SAME things as most Christians do…why is that do you suppose?
    When you cannot think for yourself you simply copy and paste.

  30. lol, John, this is his JOB- Soros pays his minions supposedly well for this, although like all good leftists it probably is not a living wage- hence Vasu’s need to be sooooo long-winded in his copy/paste posts- he gets paid by the character!

  31. The fact that these magazines are still in existence is amazing since no one buys them anymore and any parent wasting money on Teen Vouge is a fool.
    So, PP pulled out of govt. funding and now wants to claim victimhood.
    As they have claimed for years that NO Govt. Funds Go to Pay for Abortions – and Abortions are 98% of what they do- This should not affect their business in any significant way.

    Just so people like Vasu understand- PP has NOthing to do with Woman’s Health Care- Pregnancy is not a Disease, a fetus is not a Tumor or a Parasite (although some peoples existence may lead you to believe otherwise) Abortion is 97% of the time simply a voluntary decision of the woman and has nothing to do with health. Yes, in cases of a woman’s health, tubal pregnancy or some other Medical issue abortion may be necessary- But we all know that is most often NOT the reason for it. (Understand I am opposed to the govt. having that much control over anyones body to tell them what they can or cannot do, just as I would be opposed to the Govt. forcing me to have some medical procedure I did not want- I don’t want to have them telling me I cannot have it if I do) but That has nothing to do with abortion really it is about freedom. I had a cousin born in the 50s whose mother contracted polio while she was pregnant my cousin was born with her legs deformed and went through years of surgeries to have it corrected- she was finally able to walk at age 7, she was also born mildly mentally retarded (as it was called then.) When she turned 16 yrs old the Govt. required – as it did all mentally handicapped people at the time- her to be Sterilized. Very traumatizing for her. At 17 she was among the first in CA to enter a program to help mentally handicapped people learn to live on their own and take care of themselves. My mother had been paying her to be my babysitter since I was a very young child, by third grade I was helping her with her homework for this program. By 20 she had completed the program and lived until the age of 53 when she died of complications of the polio she had been born with. She was fully capable of taking care of a child- I know she took care of me and my two younger siblings quite well, and she was able to live a good happy life, got married, and her only life long wish to be a MOTHER was denied her by the Govt.

    I am sure there are ever so woke, compassionate liberals who will say- she did not deserve to live, her life was suffering (yes she had many surgeries and did struggle in some ways throughout her life) but she would have told you each day how grateful she was to have this life and how happy she was that God gave it to her. When her mother was 6 months pregnant the doctors told her she should probably abort the child, she refused to say only God gets to decide if a life is viable or worth living or not. My cousin was a wonderful girl, lady whose biggest sadness in life did not come from her condition but from the ignorant judgemental fools who thought they were worthy to deem her unfit for life!

    Btw to all you PP supporters- the fact they could give up sooooo much money shows this is a business and their choice to let go of the govt funds indicates they are Making far more Profit of it then you want to admit. Let them get any remaining funds the way other so-called non-profits do, from their supporters.

  32. Just where did politicians and federal judges appointed by those politicians who adhere to and embrace the principles of which Communistshariazionhasidism are based hence being criminals and traitors get the impression they can force taxpayers to pay for abortions and genital reassignment surgery as some treasonous judge in WI who was appointed under the rule of that illegal alien Kenyan “Butt Pirate Bathhouse Barry Osama” awhile back ruled that through Badger Care/Forward Health had to cover the cost of 2 freaks for the Genital Reassignment surgery.

  33. Sorry, my bad 🙂 doesn’t matter though it is a rather irrelevant mag so I won’t concern myself with spelling its name correctly. Thanks

  34. VasuIdiot: You’d think the animal-right-to-lifers would immediately understand the vegetation-right-to-lifers! How many vegetables did YOU KILL today?

    Democrats for Death of America!

  35. If you are aren’t a supporter of Planned Parent Hood, then tel your Congressional Representative NOT To FUND them with your TAX Dollars. That’s right mom & dad Congress is using your TAX DOLLARS to support PPH.

  36. It seems to me that what all of you are doing is hateful. In the bible Jesus says judge not lest you be judged. You people are going to be judged big time. I’m a 76 year old and all I have seen my whole life is Christians forcing their idea of religion down peoples throats. That goes for almost all religions. In the first place why do men think they have a right to any say so in what a woman does with Her body. I know I don’t.

  37. Well God bless you Gaby, when you come back in your next life why not come back as a Muslim woman (after all the left and Islam is doing all they can to get rid of these evil Christians) so then you can get a feel for how non-judgmental Muslims are, how they Never push their beliefs down peoples throats, and how supportive they will be of what a woman can do with her body…I am sure next time you will have a good story to tell us if you are fortunate enough to reach 76 in that lifetime 🙂

    Hope you did not find that too hateful of me to suggest- oh btw dear, your first line is judging others for judging others- kind of hard to no do, isn’t it… good think Jesus is very forgiving!

  38. Gaby Weddle: When you were growing up, didn’t your parents teach you right from wrong? They weren’t judging you. They were instructing you, were they not? Well, that’s what we are trying to do. I’m sorry you are not a Christian. That is quite oblivious by you stating you are pro-choice. But you see, when a couple is that lazy and selfish not to take precaution when having sex and they become pregnant. That baby is a whole different life that has rights to. Unfortunately that soul doesn’t have a voice to speak for itself. Someone else must do so.. The bible also says “Thou shall not murder”. But I suppose , you not being a Christian, that means nothing to you as well. GOD graced you with 76 years of life. May HE grant you more years to find HIM and accept Jesus as your savior. I would hope you would prefer to spend an eternity in Paradise, then in Hell . Think about it……

  39. Vasu: I do have a VERY important question for you. Since you keep stating what a big animal lover you are, and your fellow Democrats, then please explain to me why so many elephants, in your homeland, are being mistreated and tortured ? Don’t you care these beautiful, intelligent creatures are being treated so disgustingly, and dying, because of man? By YOUR fellow country men?? Perhaps you should worry about the condition, and take pride, in your own homeland before you start dictating how America should be run.. Oh, and by the way, are the workers in India making 15 dollars an hour like you keep harping the American workers should be paid to start? Of course the answer is no. And why you ask? Because India is a very poor country. But GOD bless America you and you fellow Democrats just want to keep raising our taxes to support your pie in the sky nonsense and turn the USA into part of the NWO. Well, no thank you..

  40. Gaby…So you have read the Bible. But you have not bothered to study what it means. Now read the rest of that chapter and put what Jesus said into context. He did not mean for us not to judge. We are to judge sin, which He forbids. Now read the New Testament again and this time apply what you have read. Jesus loves you so much that He came here and died for your sins so that you can join Him in Heaven. If you come to Him and accept Him as the Lord of your life, you will be saved from satan and Hell. It is your choice to make. Jesus does not force Himself on you. You have to come to Him. It costs nothing. Jesus paid it all on the cross

  41. gaby…a baby IS NOT part of a woman’s body. It is its OWN body with its own DNA. Read a biology book. Life begins at conception. It s a BABY from the moment it is conceived. So you think that women have the right to murder a baby??? Is it okay to murder a baby after it is born??? It is the SAME baby, whether in or out of the womb.

  42. The “Radical Left” is devoid of honor and decency. Their concept of life is based on moral relativism, in other words anything goes. The fact that we are dealing with children here means nothing to this corrupt and godless leftist world view.

  43. Good morning dearest Linda
    Sorry hun, I haven’t been around for a while. I’ll be back soon. Keep kicking ass dear!

  44. Colleen; I was worried about you. I’ve looked for you on every site, except R.R. too many disturbed creatures there. But I’m so happy you are alright, my dear friend. I’ll be around, you know that…

  45. These people should be jailed for trying to corrupt impressionable children. Sick, identity-crisis idiots.

  46. I believe in a woman’s right to choice. SHE CAN HAVE SEX, OR NOT HAVE SEX – HER CHOICE. If she has sex, she is responsible for the outcome (no pum intended). We need to start more benefits to ADOPTION and lessen all the rules and regulations for couples (not same sex) that want to give these babies a loving home. ARE WE TURNING AMERICA INTO A WHORE HOUSE?

  47. Vasu, even if I agree with, I’m not reading tome to figure out what you’re saying. Relax and wait for responses to follow up on your opinions.

  48. Vasu, Have you ever read I Timothy 4:1-5: “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.”
    God created animals for us to eat and use for clothing. I am pro-live, and I enjoy a good beef steak. If you don’t want to eat meat, that is fine with me, just don’t say it is wrong for me to eat animals. That is their purpose. Didn’t God tell Noah in Gen 9 that animals were OK to be used as food? vs 3 “Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here