Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling has been a hero to the radical Left for years.
But in a shocking turn of events that is now changing.
And the Left just turned on J.K. Rowling after she stated a biological fact.
A surprising coalition of figures are standing behind a 45-year-old tax expert named Maya Forstater, who was fired over a series of Tweets where she questioned permitting people to identify by whatever gender they choose.
In a strange twist, J.K. Rowling is now on her side, along with conservatives and a small coalition of feminists.
Rowling Tweeted out her support for Forstater, and stated that “sex is real.”
This was enough for the Left to go after her, with many calling her “transphobic” for stating a biological fact.
But today, to my surprise, it appears that J.K. Rowling has also walked into the tolerance buzz saw, and trans activists are setting “woke” Twitter ablaze with accusations that Rowling is a trans-exclusionary radical feminist (TERF).
Her crime? This tweet: “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill”
You can probably spot the mistake she made. Her tweet notes that she is on board with almost the entire LGBTQ agenda—except for the last little bit, where people can be persecuted for saying that men are men and that women are women.
This is a new heresy, and Exhibit A is Maya Forstater, a 45-year-old tax expert who was recently fired over a series of tweets in which she questioned the government’s plan to permit people to identify as whichever gender they choose. She took her case to an employment tribunal and lost, triggering the hashtag #IStandWithMaya. A strange coalition is forming behind the mantra, made up of angry feminists, fed-up conservatives, and, as it turns out, J.K. Rowling.
To the Left, biological facts that have been recognized for centuries are “transphobic.”
They believe that gender can’t be decided based on somebody’s body parts, but instead on how they choose to identify.
This has gone so far that some believe it is transphobic to assign a gender to newborn babies, and that there are infinite amounts of genders that somebody can choose to be.
Do you think that there are only two genders?
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.