Miley Cyrus showed her support for abortion in a disgusting manner and it’s backfiring big time


Miley Cyrus’s career is in the tank.

Desperate for attention, she engages in outrageous publicity stunts.

But she took it too far this time to show her support for abortion with this repulsive act.

Celebrities are losing their minds over the abortion fight recently.

Hollywood can’t accept that the pro-life movement is winning.

They’ve done everything they can from sex strikes, to suggesting mandatory vasectomies for men, and posing nude to “protest” Georgia and Alabama’s pro-life laws.

But Miley Cyrus may have just topped all of them.

Cyrus posted a photograph of herself licking a cake that reads, “Abortion is healthcare.”

She is literally sexualizing the act of abortion.

That’s when a street artist named Sabo edited the photo to show the ugly side of pro-abortion lobby.

Sabo recreated the image to make it look like Miley Cyrus is licking a dead baby instead of cake.

And the image is going viral.

Breitbart reports:

Street artist Sabo refashioned a photo of pop star Miley Cyrus licking a cake that read “abortion is healthcare,” replacing the cake with a bloody, aborted baby.

“This is in response to Miley licking an “ABORTION IS HEALTHCARE” cake which those on the Right found as tasteless and disrespectful as I’m sure the Left will find my version,” Sabo told Breitbart News of his repurposed political art, which popped up this week around the city of Los Angeles.

“Also it seems Miley Cyrus is planning a colaboration with Planned Parenthood in the near future I hope my campaign derails, however I’m sure it won’t because the Left is lacking morals and standards,” Sabo said of the “She Is Coming” singer joining forces with the abortion giant and high-end fashion brand Marc Jacobs to sell “Don’t Fuck With My Freedom” hoodies, with 100% of the proceeds from the $175 pink hoodies going to Planned Parenthood.

WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT: click here to view the image for yourself.

Some people think the image goes too far.

But it simply depicts the sad reality that abortion advocates desire.

Miley Cyrus posted the photo to get attention, sexualize abortion, and raise money for Planned Parenthood.

Sabo’s artwork has created a great deal of controversy, which he hopes will expose people to the truth about abortion.

What are your thoughts?


  1. Hurrah for Sabo. It is great that he is showing the repulsiveness of both the whole abortion issue and of Miley Cyrus. I’ll bet Billy Rae is a very disappointed father. That girl will do anything to try to stay relevant, as most failures do, but as for her and many of her kind, it is far too late. Their train left long before the even got to the depot.

    • Bob: I strongly agree with the 18 comments posted that do not support M.C. and her disgusting display. And even though Sabo’s image was quite upsetting to me,perhaps someone that promotes this abortion issue will see the horror of killing an innocent life.Miley Cyrus is pathetic and a disgrace…..

      • Molly is a sick ,sex-mad Hollywood POS. All those women who think killing their babies is a right, will answer to God and their discarded babies who were not discarded after all. Maybe it’s better they be with God than their evil mothers, Imagine being raised by someone who killed your sibling(s).

    • Can’t be disappointed. He supports his daughter and even smokes weed with her and her mom. She is the most disgusting vile and evil person around!

    • Miley Cyrus is a disgusting little pig. Her parents allowed her to go “rogue” when she was just a teenager. She could hardly wait to pose nude and he mother defended it. They have nothing to be proud of from this kid.

    • M.C. was okay when she was a kid on Disney . BUT she grew up into idiocy !! What a MORON, AND IDIOT AND WH### !!! TOO BAD !!

    • I doubt that Billy Rae is disappointed with her. He let her do all kinds of things that she shouldn’t even as a child. She is a brat and he is an enabler of the brat. They are both discusting.

  2. Miley Cyrus has never risen above the social stigma of Pig, first, last, and always, and one day, for her, it will end bad.

  3. She is a disgrace to womanhood& God!!Where were her parents! Sure as Hell didn’t raise a decent human being! Ugly inside & Out!!

    • They allowed her to be abused while a Disney child star. I’m sure there were all kinds of pressures, including sexual applied to her while her parents stood by and allowed it. She’s a mess and until she chooses to look at what’s driving her sexual insanity, she’ll stay a mess.

  4. I got disgusted seeing this has been whores wagging her tounge in every picture she was in. I wonder if her dad is proud of raising 2 whores.


  6. Disgusting girl who hasn’t grown up and probably never will. Her career is probably on the skid and she needs the spotlight be it good or bad. Hollywood style.
    To her dad::Are you proud of her? She hurts your career also!!

  7. She never got over not being on top. She did and is still trying to get back. She had. A few disgracefull times that did work, now she will stop at nothing for that recognition. ( nothing ). She has beat that dog to death to prove it. It’s called apologise to your dad and try to learn to be a nice young lady that can interact with the public and not pull her panties down to do it. Here is what you do ( SORR DAD FOR EMBARESSING YOU ) got it ?

    • Agree. Doctors have forgotten the Hippocratic oath they take to be doctors, they’re back street butchers now operating on main street via planned parenthood.

      • Yeah, “first do no harm”. They do more than harm babies, they tear them apart! People are so far gone, that they can’t see this? God gave them a brain to think with, and a heart to feel. What happened?

        • When a society falls to the level we see from the liberals where do we go? They promote every type of evil and degenerate act imaginable. Murdering even just born babies is now okay with these miscreants? Sick!!

  8. The best way to deal with her and probably 95% of the so called entertainers is just ignore them. They have no idea what it means to actually work fir something. Giving them attention when they do something stupid just keeps them in the limelight. The press refers to sports figures and movie stars as legends. The legends are the hard working men and women that keep this nation going. You don’t see these people applauding abortion they believe in family and moral values.

  9. she is just one more prostitute trying to do anything to stay revelant ..IT AIN’T WORKING ..GO HOME AND CRAWL BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK..


  11. Truth is Truth . . .”it is what it is”. Miley is disgusting and needs to be exposed for it. Anyone who supports murdering the most helpless of innocent lives, especially when there are childless couples who would be MORE THAN HAPPY to give that wonderful life a loving home (that GOD gave us) needs to be exposed for the Reprobate that she is. That little life didn’t ask to be born to a murderous society, and we need to protect it. TRUMP 2020!

  12. So where is the picture by Sabo, which should be floating all over the internet. Stop these pigs from getting all the exposure (excuse the pun) when it comes to exposure by this “has been” – you don’t like the laws stay out of the states – they don’t want you anyway.

  13. This Bitch Miley C. FOX never learned YET ??? she working hard ever since how old she is when started being HANNAH MONTANA but all of that the our almighty father TAKE AWAY from her ..her house burnt it up ..

  14. Abortions have killed far more people than guns in this country, yet nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the freedom to have an abortion like it does the right to keep and bear arms. The left just makes things up and then claims its a right. They are barbaric. If a single cell of life were found on Mars they would celebrate it as a profound discovery, yet a single cell of a developing human is just a mass of tissue that can be destroyed on an impulse due to lack of character and any self responsibility. And don’t give me this crap that it isn’t a baby until it is born.

  15. Healthcare is about SAVING LIVES not taking them. Once a SEPARATE heartbeat can be heard there is no longer any possible argument that it is just GENETIC MATERIAL instead of a life.

    Yet these HYPOCRITICALLY celebrities who ROUTINELY CAMPAIGN to abolish actual CONSTITUTIONAL rights that OFFEND them when people who do not agree with their politics exercise those rights demand that we have no right to PROTECT CHILDREN just because the one TEMPORARILY housing them in the first few weeks of their life is INCONVENIENCED by the fact they have to TAKE CARE of the child until it can be given up for adoption.

    The fact is there was NUMEROUS ways they could have avoided being pregnant in the first place in fact some of the biggest “POPULATION control” nations have made certain procedures to do that mandatory after they have their first child.

    Lets be clear to anyone with a brain once a separate heartbeat can be heard there is no longer any possible doubt that it is a LIVING human being not just shapeless GENETIC material as the ABORTION PROMOTERS continue to claim.

    Add in the leaked memo’s, the ones who DIED or got MAIMED during the “procedure” , the one who had to call 911 when she changed her mind then was held captive at the clinic as they tried to FORCE her to go ahead with the abortion and the EUGENICS background of planned parenthoods founder and it is clear to anyone with a brain that it is not about a WOMAN”S RIGHT to choose or healthcare it is about POPULATION CONTROL aimed at those the EUGENICS organization behind Planned Parenthood consider “human weeds”.

  16. If you women are that lazy and nasty that choose to lay in it deserve 18 years of grief. You have the morning before/\ the morning after. Condoms, fem spray, the sponge, and the pill! You know where you blew it pardon the pun? Asking the rest of us to pay for your mistakes. Asking us to pay for your sex it`s not going to happen. You opened up this can of worms now a lot of states are dealing you a heavy blow. This is between you your sperm doner and GOD.

  17. I love Miley Cyrus, but she does not speak for all vegans! You’d think the unborn-right-to-lifers would immediately understand the animal-right-to-lifers! The case for animal rights should be readily understandable to the millions of Americans opposed to abortion on demand.

    “Although I may disagree with some of its underlying principles,” writes pro-life Democrat Karen Swallow Prior, “there is much for me, an anti-abortion activist, to respect in the animal rights movement. Animal rights activists, like me, have risked personal safety and reputation for the sake of other living beings. Animal rights activists, like me, are viewed by many in the mainstream as fanatical wackos, ironically exhorted by irritated passerby to ‘Get a Life!’ Animal rights activists, like me, place a higher value on life than on personal comfort and convenience, and in balancing the sometimes competing interests of rights and responsibilities, choose to err on the side of compassion and nonviolence.”

    Although dominated by secular progressives valuing personal autonomy, privacy and civil liberties, the animal rights movement, representing a cross-section of mainstream secular American society, is NOT “officially pro-choice,” but IS divided on abortion. In a 1992 interview on Dennis Prager’s conservative talk show, when specifically asked about the animal rights position on abortion, Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), admitted, “We’re divided.”

    Former television game show host Bob Barker is a conservative Republican and an animal activist. Tony LaRussa of the Animal Rescue Foundation is a political conservative. Vegan labor leader Cesar Chavez was pro-life. Vegan civil rights leader Dick Gregory was pro-life. Former Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy, a devout pacifist, has expressed opposition to abortion, and in the 1980s was critical of Reverend Jesse Jackson for having changed sides on the issue.

    Dixie Mahy, past president of the San Francisco Vegetarian Society, has been vegetarian for sixty years, vegan for forty of those sixty years, and identifies herself as pro-life-and-pro-animal Matthew Scully, a conservative Catholic and former speechwriter for George W. Bush identifies himself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.” Catholic Concern for Animals is pro-life-and-pro-animal. Reverend Frank & Mary Hoffman’s Christian vegan website is pro-life-and-pro-animal Compassion for animals is a fundamental tenet of the Baha’i faith, which endorses vegetarianism, says abortion is more a matter of individual conscience, but concludes, without taking a position on abortion, life should not be destroyed.

    John Stuart Mill wrote: “The reasons for legal intervention in favor of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves — the animals.”

    Animals are like children. Henry Bergh, founder of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), successfully prosecuted a woman for child abuse in 1873, at a time when children had no legal protection, under the then currently existing animal protection statutes. This case started the child-saving crusade around the world.

    In Christianity and the Rights of Animals, the Reverend Dr. Andrew Linzey writes: “In some ways, Christian thinking is already oriented in this direction. What is it that so appalls us about cruelty to children or oppression of the vulnerable, but that these things are betrayals of relationships of special care and special trust? Likewise, and even more so, in the case of animals who are mostly defenseless before us.”

    When told the animal rights movement is divided on abortion, Serrin Foster, Executive Director of Feminists For Life, said understandingly, “The Children’s Defense Fund is also divided on abortion.” Feminists For Life has many vegetarians and vegans. Serrin identifies herself as a vegetarian.

    From 1992 through 2003, James Dawson, raised Catholic and now a Buddhist, published Live and Let Live, a pro-life / animal rights / libertarian ‘zine. The ancient eastern reincarnationist religions Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism all predate Christianity, all oppose abortion, all teach ahimsa, or nonviolence towards humans and animals alike to the point of vegetarianism, all are vegan-friendly, and all teach that abortion and war are the karma for killing animals, and that therefore, we cannot end abortion nor bring about world peace until first we abolish the killing of animals.

    This knowledge, however, does not rest with everyone. Not all pro-life-and-pro-animal people advocate the reincarnationist strategy for ending abortion and bringing about world peace. Shay Van Vlieman, founder of Vegans For Life in the late ’90s, said she doesn’t expect to see a vegan president in her lifetime: she would just be glad to elect a president who will work to overturn Roe v. Wade. And she insists she is not a Republican, but a libertarian!

    During the late 1990s, Rachel MacNair, a Quaker pacifist, feminist, vegan, past president of Feminists For Life, moderated an email list for pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans. Rachel is now a psychology professor, and has written several books on nonviolence. In 1998, the Animals Agenda ran a cover story on the debate within the animal rights movement over abortion. Vegan congressman Dennis Kucinich (D – Ohio), one of the most liberal members of Congress, was pro-life throughout most of his political career.

    Pro-life vegetarians and pro-life vegans are found within the “consistent-ethic” movement: pro-lifers opposed to capital punishment. A significant number of “consistent-ethic” Christians are / were vegetarian or vegan: Rose Evans, Ruth Enero, Rachel MacNair, Albert Fecko, Carol Crossed, Bill Samuel, Mary Krane Derr, Mary Rider, Father John Dear, etc.

    Mary Rider, a practicing Catholic, wrote in Harmony: Voices for a Just Future, a “consistent-ethic” periodical in 2002:

    “So we teach our children to walk softly on the earth and to embrace nonviolence as the only legitimate means of conflict resolution, on both a personal and a global level. We are aware of the excessive, privileged life we lead as educated, first world U.S. citizens and of the responsibilities to which our privilege calls us. We try to live simply. We eat low on the food chain. We try to buy nothing new… We try to respect all life and carry that message forward in all we do… Because we value people and relationships over things… First world consumption kills people around the world… Pollution, environmental devastation, corrupt governments, war, sweatshops… all are a are a result of our desire to buy more at a lower price… We believe each person has a right to live a valued and respected life free from hunger and discrimination…”

    The threat of overpopulation is frequently used to justify abortion as birth control. On a vegan diet, however, the world could easily support a human population several times its present size. The world’s cattle alone consume enough to feed over 8.7 billion humans. Even if abortion advocates argue shifting to a plant-based diet, a vegan diet, isn’t enough to stave off overpopulation, in light of the data showing the depletion of energy, food, fresh water, land space, raw materials and resources as well as the heavy contribution to air and water pollution, deforestization, and global warming caused by a meat-centered diet, how do abortion advocates — warning about overpopulation consuming the world’s resources — justify consuming meat?

    If vegetarianism were merely about “fit” or following a peculiar set of “dietary laws” why are pro-lifers offended by pro-choice vegetarians and pro-choice vegans? Clearly, they’re offended because they know vegetarianism involves the animals’ right to life, and thus these pro-choicers appear to value animal life over human life under some circumstances. And issues like animal experimentation, circuses, and fur have nothing to do with diet, eating, nor food, but do involve the animals’ right to life. Leonardo Da Vinci, Count Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas Gandhi, George Bernard Shaw, Susan B. Anthony, Percy Shelley, Rosa Parks, etc. were all vegetarian, and none of them were Jewish nor Muslim.

    For Love of Animals: Christian Ethics, Consistent Action offers an introduction to animal rights ethics within Christianity alongside directly related sanctity-of-life issues, like the possible rights of unborn children. The book’s foreword is written by Mary Eberstadt, senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC, a Catholic who identifies herself as “Pro-Animal, Pro-Life.”

    Author Charles Camosy responds to criticisms from academicians Peter Singer and Lynn White, Jr., that the misinterpretation of “human dominion” (versus compassionate stewardship) is responsible for the current ecological crisis. Camosy indicates that Christianity cannot be blamed if humans with their imperfections distort their own religious teachings, that Christianity did not give rise to the industrial revolution, and that real Christianity — as it was meant to be practiced — is at odds with market-driven ethics and mass consumerism (a point made decades ago by liberal Protestant theologian Dr. Harvey Cox). Camosy concludes: “I became convinced that, if I wanted to be authentically and consistently pro-life, I should give up eating meat.” Dozens of books have been written on Christianity and animal rights. Camosy merely provides an overview of animal ethics within Christianity.

    Steve Kaufman, head of the Christian Vegetarian Association, was raised Jewish, and is now serving in the United Church of Christ, America’s largest pro-choice Protestant denomination. Steve expressed interest in Democrats For Life, his only reservation was whether Democrats For Life favors criminalizing abortion. Some animal advocates and activists (like Catholic vegan columnist Colman McCarthy) oppose abortion, but don’t think criminalization is the answer.

  18. I wouldn’t be surprised if Dolly Parton, who is Miley’s Godmother, has told Billie Ray Cyrus that she isn’t interested in retaining that title any longer. If not, she needs to!

  19. At least Miley grew her hair back and is easy to look at! When she butchered her hair in 2013, I felt she deserved to be MOONED for it and it should have been legal to MOON her! Now that her hair is grown back and looks good, Miley is OK!

  20. The only mistake Sabo made was when he did NOT depict the slag Miley licking a dead black baby. Why does the Left hate blacks so much they do their evil best to murder unborn black babies? Eugenist Sanger must be applauding from He!!


  22. If someone cut that nasty tongue out of her mouth, you’d never see her again. Don’t know what she is thinking, hanging her tongue out like that. Makes me think of what she is, a stinking snake. Hate em


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here