Tim Allen just teased a show reboot that would shake up network television


It’s no secret the entertainment world despises conservative culture.

And ABC towed the liberal line when it cancelled “Last Man Standing” in 2016 despite its strong ratings.

But Tim Allen just teased a show reboot that would really shake up network television.

Tim Allen is a rarity in the entertainment industry.

He is a successful conservative Christian actor.

The mega-star is famous, among other things, for voicing Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story.

But many remember him for his famous role as Tim Taylor in “Home Improvement.”

The show had a successful 8 year run as one of the most popular TV Shows in the 90s.

And now the A-list celebrity just teased out the plot line for a “Home Improvement” reboot.

Fox news reports:

“Last Man Standing” star Tim Allen has revealed what the “Home Improvement” reboot would be about if the show were to make a comeback.

After “Last Man” was canceled on ABC in 2016, the actor began to think about bringing back his famous ’90s sitcom and his iconic Tim Taylor character.

“I never felt—and it’s come true—that this was done. It never felt right,” Allen told E! News that the reboot idea for “Home Improvement” was so close to being a done deal until he learned “Last Man Standing” would be revived by Fox. “In the time off, we got real close where we talked to everybody…It was an interesting idea.”

Allen said the plot for the “Home Improvement” revival would include the Taylor family boys, Brad (Zachery Ty Bryan), Randy (Jonathan Taylor Thomas) and Mark (Taran Noah Smith), all working as property owners, pursuing real estate careers in Michigan. Jill, played by Patricia Richardson, and Allen would still be happily married but living in a brand-new house.

Allen’s character, Tim Taylor, still being in a happy marriage after all these years would certainly contrast with shows like ABC’s “Modern Family.”

Much to everyone’s surprise, ABC abruptly canceled his popular, long-running TV Show, “Last Man Standing,” after 6 seasons.

Critics argue it is because Tim Allen is a conservative.

ABC is a liberal, never-Trump network.

But Tim Allen got back at ABC by signing a contract with Fox to reboot “Last Man Standing” this year.

And no one anticipated just how successful the show would be on Fox.

The reboot’s pilot episode was the second highest viewed pilot in the show’s history.

Of the reboot’s success, Allen said, “It was quite startling, and actually overwhelming.”

This proves what conservatives were saying all along.

The entertainment industry is so opposed to conservative culture they’d even cancel a show that’s still in high demand.

Would you watch a reboot of “Home Improvement” with the original cast?

Sound off in the comments!

One report spells doom for America’s next generation


Radical liberals have been chipping away at society’s morals and traditional standards since the sexual revolution in the 1960s.

They cheer cultural shifts toward immorality as “progressive.”

But a new report spells doom for America’s next generation.

A report from the United Nations Population Fund found that out-of-wedlock births are skyrocketing as a result of cohabitation.

Their big finding is that unmarried couples account for roughly 40% of all births in the U.S.

The Daily Caller reports:

Unmarried couples are having roughly 40 percent of all births in the U.S., marking a trend that may be detrimental to the upbringing of those children.

For the first time in U.S. history, out-of-wedlock births in America are largely a result of cohabitation, according to the United Nations Population Fund 2018 State of World report released Wednesday. Single mothers had nearly 90 percent of out-of-wedlock births in 1968, but that number decreased to 53 percent in 2017, according to the Pew Research Center.

“Compared to children of married parents, those with cohabiting parents are more likely to experience the breakup of their families, be exposed to ‘complex’ family forms, live in poverty, suffer abuse, and have negative psychological and educational outcomes,” according to the Institute for Family Studies (IFS).

Roughly 14 million American adults cohabited in 2007, and that number rose to 18 million in 2016, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Half of cohabiting couples in the U.S. are younger than 35, according to Bloomberg Quint. Cohabitation has increased about 2,000 percent since 1960, according to the American Enterprise Institute.

Two-thirds of U.S. adults said increasing numbers of single women raising children by themselves was bad for society, according to a 2015 Pew Research Center survey. Nearly 50 percent of those surveyed also said greater numbers of unmarried couples raising children is not good for society, according to Pew.

This is what happens when we throw away traditional standards and morals for our younger generations in pursuit of “progressive” values.

Organizations like Planned Parenthood and their leftist pals are more damaging to society than most people think.

When they enable our young adults, and even teens, to engage in promiscuous behavior with the promise of no consequence, they are lying.

The consequences are clear.

Psychologically unhealthy out-of-wedlock births are becoming the norm, and effects of a poor upbringing follows like poverty or a lack of education.

The radical leftists will never admit their push to demoralize society has negative consequences.

They will continue to hide behind the guise of “progressing society” and promoting the libertine ideal that everyone ought to “live the way they want to” without any fear of repercussions.

Do you think the rise of out-of-wedlock births is an issue?

Let us know in the comments below.

This rapper crossed the line with his attack on Melania Trump


The fake news media and their leftist pals claim the right is waging a “war” on women.

But they’re just using it as a wedge issue against Republicans.

And their silence was deafening when this rapper crossed the line with his attack on Melania Trump.

Rapper T.I. recently made a music video where a Melania Trump lookalike gives him a strip dance in a set designed to look like the Oval Office.

The video, which was posted to Twitter, took a dig at Kanye’s support of President Trump:

“Dear 45, I ain’t Kanye.”

WARNING! Explicit Content:

Trump’s communications director fired back, calling the video “disgusting” and a “vulgar” attack.

But the Melania impersonator thinks otherwise.

She told Inside Edition that Melania shouldn’t take offense to the video because her husband “does a lot of bullying himself.”

She added, “If I was insulting her and degrading her, then it would be one thing, but I don’t think I was” – implying there is nothing wrong with making such a vulgar and demeaning video.

CNN Reports:

First lady Melania Trump’s spokeswoman on Tuesday went after rapper T.I., whose most recent music video features a Trump lookalike dancing without clothes in a fake Oval Office.

“Like it or not, she is the first lady and this is the White House,” Stephanie Grisham, Trump’s communications director, told CNN in a statement. “It’s disrespectful and disgusting to portray her this way simply because of politics. These kinds of vulgar attacks only further the divisiveness and bias in our country — it needs to stop.”

The fake news media say they care about women.

But none of them bothered to lift a finger to defend Mrs. Trump after this disgusting attack.

If they truly cared about women they would slam T.I. for unabashedly portraying Melania Trump as a stripper.

This isn’t the first time the fake news media has lauded those who attack the First Family.

They also cozied up with Snoop Dogg when his album “Make America Crip Again” portrayed Trump dead with a toe tag.

They ran hundreds of articles letting the world know of its existence.

But they didn’t condemn it.

The fake news media and their leftist pals couldn’t be any clearer: they hate Trump and will do anything to destroy him and his family.

Wait until you see why this Atheist group is suing Congress


Atheists cry they want “separation of church and state.”

But what they really want is to force their idea of secularism on everyone.

And one atheist group is now suing Congress for the most ridiculous reason.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) is at it again.

This time FFRF is suing Congress because they want atheists to open Congress with an invocation instead of a prayer by an ordained Chaplain or minister.

Christian Headlines reports:

A federal court heard an appeal Thursday in a case involving an atheist group that wants congressional invocations opened up to those who don’t believe in God.

Dan Barker, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, was invited in 2015 by his representative, Democrat Mark Pocan, to deliver an invocation but was prevented from doing so by House Chaplain Patrick Conroy. Conroy’s office said all guest chaplains must be ordained by a “recognized body in the faith in which he/she practices” and must have an ordination certificate.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation sued, arguing that congressional policy violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. After FFRF lost last year, it appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The tradition of federal legislative prayer dates all the way back to the First Continental Congress in 1774.

In fact, House rules require Congress to be opened each legislative day with a prayer.

In the first ruling, the federal court ruled that Congress has the right to invite whomever they please, regardless of religious background.

Lately FFRF has been particularly aggressive in trying to impose their secularism on society.

As we’ve reported, FFRF attacked a high-school for praying for a sick girl before a football game.

On top of that, they also threatened lawsuits against a school that had a prayer before their graduation ceremony.

So this is nothing new for FFRF and their band of radical atheists.

They’re out to eliminate any public display of Christianity.

Do you think Congress should invite atheists to “pray” before in lieu of ordained Chaplains or ministers?

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

The feminazis just forced this corporation to rebrand a 60-year-old product for being “sexist”


People take offense at just about anything these days.

The “outrage culture” is all the rage.

Just look at how the feminazis forced this company to rebrand a 60-year-old product.

“Mansize” Kleenex is “sexist.”

At least according to the feminazis in the U.K., who’ve successfully forced Kimberly-Clark, Kleenex’s parent company, to rebrand a product they’ve been selling for 62 years.

CNN reports:

The company first launched its tissues aimed at men in 1956, claiming they would “stay strong when wet.”

But complaints on social media about the product’s gendered marketing is prompting the change.

Starting later this year, the tissues will be called “Kleenex Extra Large.”

Kimberly-Clark said it received a “consistent increase of complaints.”

According to CNN, the Company pushed back on the notion that there was anything wrong with the branding.

“Kleenex Mansize tissues have been on shelves for the past 60 years. Over that time, the brand has always been characterized by a much larger tissue size, which is both soft and strong,” the company said in a statement.

“Kimberly-Clark in no way suggests that being both soft and strong is an exclusively masculine trait, nor do we believe that the Mansize branding suggests or endorses gender inequality,” the statement added.

The feminazis gloated over their win, as CNN notes:

Sam Smethers, chief executive of UK-based women’s organization The Fawcett Society, said the rebrand “is not to be sneezed at.”

“Removing sexist branding such as this is just sensible 21st century marketing. But we still have a long way to go before using lazy stereotypes to sell products is a thing of the past,” she added.

Kleenex certainly won’t be the last company that’s targeted by public pressure campaigns to waste money rebranding a product that’s been on the market for years.

In fact, ABC News highlighted discussion on Twitter that “Pink Lady apples, Lady Grey tea and lady fingers could be subjected to name changes” in the future.

What are your thoughts about all of this?

Let us know in the comments below!

You won’t believe what this Hollywood liberal just said about “Snow White”


Hollywood liberals are losing their grip on reality.

Every day brings new examples.

But this latest one topped the charts with the most unbelievable take yet on “Snow White.”

Kristen Bell, the voice of princess Anna in “Frozen” and current star of NBC’s “The Good Place,” told Parents magazine that the iconic children’s classic “Snow White” is problematic.

She claims Prince Charming kissing Snow White teaches kids it’s ok to kiss women without their consent.

Parents magazine reports:

Kristen Bell reads every night to daughters Lincoln, 5, and Delta, 3. “It’s truly my favorite part of the day,” Bell says. “I glance away from the book and see their brains working while we’re all cuddled up like meerkats.”

But the ladies don’t just read, they discuss—especially classic Disney storylines.

“Every time we close Snow White I look at my girls and ask, ‘Don’t you think it’s weird that Snow White didn’t ask the old witch why she needed to eat the apple? Or where she got that apple?’ I say, ‘I would never take food from a stranger, would you?’ And my kids are like, ‘No!’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, I’m doing something right.'”

The apple question is not the only one that Bell—a Disney Princess herself as the voice of Anna in Frozen—has after reading the tale. “Don’t you think that it’s weird that the prince kisses Snow White without her permission?” Bell says she has asked her daughters. “Because you can not kiss someone if they’re sleeping!”

This is a blatant PR stunt based on the #MeToo movement.

But these outrageously ignorant statements ignore key aspects of the plot.

Only “true love’s first kiss” awakens Snow White.

And the Disney version of the Fairy Tale purposely makes use of the idea of fate keeping her from being awaken by the wrong person – meaning Prince Charming is the only person who could kiss her.

In addition to her kooky stance on “Snow White,” she’s hardly a role model herself.

On the podcast “WTF with Marc Maron,” Bell said she regularly attends parties with ecstasy supplied by one of her husband’s “buddies.”

She also admitted to smoking weed.

And her husband readily promotes this lifestyle and “supervises” the parties, even though he has committed to a life of sobriety.

She said her husband “just feels you shouldn’t leave earth without trying ecstasy or mushrooms.”

To the left, partying with psychoactive drugs like Ecstasy and Mushrooms is perfectly fine but classic children’s Fairy Tales like “Snow White” are dangerous.

Would you take parenting advice from Kristen Bell?

Let us know your opinion in the comments.

Four transgenders are suing this state over an outrageous request


Radical leftists want to normalize transgenderism in our society.

If they get their way, it’ll be illegal to disagree with their demands.

And you won’t believe why this state is being sued by four transgenders.

A group of four transgenders is demanding Kansas change the sex indicated on their birth certificates.

The State of Kansas denied their request saying, “The Kansas State Health & Environment department does not have the authority to change an individual’s birth certificate with the exception of minor corrections or by court order. Gender identity would not be considered a minor correction.”

Now these transgenders are suing the State of Kansas because their birth certificates are “inaccurate.”

Christian News reports:

Two men who identify as women, and two women who identify as men, have filed suit against the State of Kansas for declining to change their birth certificates to reflect their “gender identity” rather than their birth sex, stating that “the gender markers originally placed on their birth certificate are inaccurate because they are based on visual assumptions about their sex made at the time of their births.”

The lawsuit, filed on Monday by Lambda Legal, argues that the State’s practice of denying the amended birth certificates deprives those with gender dysphoria “a quintessential identity document that accurately reflects who they are, thereby infringing on their fundamental liberty in self-definition and autonomy in their person and identity.”

“While the State of Kansas provides non-transgender (i.e., cisgender) people born in Kansas with accurate birth certificates—birth certificates that reflect their true sex, consistent with their gender identity—the State of Kansas categorically bars transgender people from obtaining birth certificates that reflect their true sex, consistent with their gender identity,” it reads.

Transgenders, along with their radical leftist pals want to force the government to give into their ludicrous views of gender and sex.

But should the government be forced to change gender on birth certificates based on how people “feel”?

They say the issue is that their gender was “assumed based on visual assumptions about their sex… at the time of their births.”

Many in the LGBT community even argue that we shouldn’t be giving newborns a gender at all.

The truth is, when transgenders complete the process, their rates of depression and suicide actually stay the same as before their “coming out” or sex changes.

The everyday American sees right through this game they’re trying to play.

Studies have shown that most Americans rightly believe there are only two genders simply based on sex.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you think states should be forced to issue new birth certificates to transgenders?

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

These Christian wedding vendors could be facing jail time after this court ruling


The radical leftists lost the “Masterpiece” bakery case in the Supreme Court, and now they are out for revenge.

They want to force Christians to obey their societal demands, or face the consequences.

And what this state is forcing these Christian wedding vendors to do is unconscionable.

In Minnesota, two Christian wedding videographers are facing fines and jail time for refusing to make gay wedding films.

Minnesota has already ruled in a lower court that their “Human Rights Act” necessitates that they must make gay wedding films or face the consequences.

CBN News reports:

Two Christian filmmakers appeared before the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Paul Tuesday to challenge Minnesota state law which they say illegally forces them to produce and create films expressing messages that contradict their core beliefs.

Telescope Media Group owners Carl and Angel Larsen have already been threatened with hefty fines and up to 90 days in jail if they choose to disregard the law.

The couple is being represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

The Larsens want to enter the wedding industry. However, the state’s Human Rights Act stipulates if the couple creates films celebrating their Christian beliefs about marriage – that marriage is between one man and one woman, they must also create films about marriage that violate their beliefs, including films promoting same-sex marriages.

“The government shouldn’t threaten filmmakers with fines and jail time to force them to create films that violate their beliefs,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jeremy Tedesco in a press release. “Carl and Angel are storytellers – they script, stage, conduct interviews, capture footage, select music, edit and more – all to tell compelling stories through film that promote their religious beliefs.”

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Masterpiece that the government must respect the belief—held by countless Americans from all walks of life—that marriage is between one man and one woman,” he continued. “The 8th Circuit should reinstate the Larsens’ lawsuit and order the state to stop forcing the Larsens to speak messages about marriage that violate their beliefs.”

This has become an epidemic across the United States.

Christians are being pressured to throw away their religious beliefs and bow down to the LGBT agenda.

But Christians are not having it.

Most recently the Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of a Christian bakery “Masterpiece Cakes.”

The Supreme Court ruled that the bakery is exempt from baking a cake for a gay couple because of their religious background.

However, in Oregon, another Christian bakery is facing a very similar issue, and an appellate court ruled that the bakery must make the cake or face consequences.

The truth is, when Christians simply try to exercise their freedom of religion they are publicly shamed and penalized.

But when any other group exercises freedom from religion, they are praised by the media and Hollywood culture-drivers.

We will keep you up-to-date on this ongoing story.

You won’t believe what this transgender “woman” tried to pull off


The LGBTQ social justice army is rapidly advancing.

They already control Hollywood, the Fake News Media, and many politicians in Washington.

But you won’t believe what this transgender “woman” just tried to pull off.

A transgender cyclist just won the women’s 2018 UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships on October 14, 2018.

Except there’s one problem – the winner, Rachel McKinnon, was formerly a man who “became” a woman.

Many called the win unfair to women cyclists because men have natural advantages over women in physical strength.

McKinnon, responded by calling the critics “bigots” or “transphobic.”

Pinkies News reports:

A transgender woman has won a world championship in cycling for the first time.

Rachel McKinnon won gold in the sprint at the 2018 UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships on Saturday.

McKinnon has faced backlash for her participation in the Los Angeles-based championships, with many people online accusing her of having an unfair advantage over her opponents.

The Canadian cyclist, who is also an assistant professor in the department of philosophy at South Carolina’s College of Charleston, has defended herself against the claims on Twitter.

In one post, she wrote: “I train 15-20hrs/week, twice/day 5-6 days/week. Yeah…I just jumped off the couch and won. Transphobic bigots, y’all.”

Things got so out of hand that even the American Council on Science and Health weighed in.

An article published on their website by Alex Berezow titled “Should Men Who Identify As Women Compete In Women’s Sports?” affirmed the charges of unfair competition:

While we are not privy to the underlying nature of Dr. McKinnon’s transgenderism, a cursory glance at her physique reveals that she is built like a biological male. Regardless of what postmodernists say, there are real, objective, measurable biological differences between men and women. That is why sports are segregated by sex.

But Dr. McKinnon rejects that basic biology.

Men are bigger than women. Period. Additionally, men have more muscle mass: Skeletal muscle constitutes about 42% of a man’s body mass but only 36% of a woman’s body mass. This is literally textbook anatomy & physiology.

Likewise, Dr. McKinnon’s claim that the performance gap between men and women in sports being due to sociological differences rather than biological ones is pure rubbish. The reason that the world’s fastest male 100-meter sprinter (Usain Bolt) is nearly one full second faster than the world’s fastest female sprinter (Florence Griffith-Joyner) is because of biology, not the male patriarchy.

Rachel McKinnon is a philosophy professor at College of Charleston.

Dr. McKinnon claims that it is the male patriarchy that bars women from entering sports.

But the American Council on Science and Health totally debunked his claims.

Even other members of the LGBTQ community thought that McKinnon’s arguments didn’t pass the smell test.

Dr. Kathleen Stock, a lesbian and professor of philosophy at University of Sussex, downplayed the win due to McKinnon’s “genetically endowed features.”

Should Rachel McKinnon forfeit the award due to unfair advantages?

Sound off in the comments!

What this self-proclaimed Christian doctor said about abortion will make you sick


Abortionists just won’t give up their charade.

They will use any means necessary to deceive people into believing their propaganda.

And what this self-proclaimed “Christian” doctor said about abortion will make you sick to your stomach.

Dr. Willie Parker claims to be a “Christian” abortionist who has been committing abortions since 2002.

In defense of his bloody business, he’s even said, “I believe, as an abortion provider, I’m doing God’s work.”

Parker is part of Planned Parenthood’s initiative targeting Christians for abortions.

In an Op-Ed for the Huffington Post he stated he is “proud to be an abortion provider.”

Planned Parenthood has gone so far as to form a Clergy Advocacy Board of “faith leaders.”

Their goal is to use propaganda to get Christians to believe that abortion is a “moral good.”

40% of women who’ve had abortions claim to regularly attend church.

70% of women who’ve had abortions profess to be Christians.

If Planned Parenthood is successful at getting Christians to buy into their propaganda, it will solidify abortion-on-demand in America for generations to come.

But abortion is nothing more than murder.

60 million unborn babies have been aborted since Roe v. Wade.

Abortionists like Dr. Willie Parker don’t care that life begins at conception.

They don’t care they are committing murder.

In his Op-Ed, Dr. Parker called for an increase in abortion facilities so more women could receive “care.”

He conveniently forgets that there are other places to go for real care that don’t involve abortion.

The National Association of Community Health Centers dwarfs Planned Parenthood in terms of women’s care.

There are also free clinics and hospitals across the U.S. that offer women’s health services.

Needymeds.org has a database of 16,574 free/low-cost/sliding scale clinics that works based on location and the overwhelming majority of them are not Planned Parenthood.

A map by the Charlotte Lozier Institute drives this point home:

But abortion doctors like Willie Parker would rather distort the facts to make abortion-on-demand commonplace nationwide.

They know that “safe, legal, and rare” is no longer the goal for today’s Abortion Lobby.

Do you agree with abortion doctors like Willie Parker?

Let us know in the comments!