What liberal activists just did to this town’s 70 year Christmas tradition will make you see red


Nothing scares liberal activists more than the nativity story.

To them, the story of a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes lying in a manger being visited by wise men is a bloody sore on the history of mankind.

And what liberal activists did to this town’s 70 year Christmas tradition will make you see red.

A public school district in Michigan was issued a warning by civil rights activists to remove their 70-year-old Wise Men display or face a lawsuit.

The beloved display of the three Wise Men sits on top of Newaygo Elementary School.

The Michigan Association of Civil Rights Activists (MACRA) put the Newaygo Public School District on notice because they allegedly received a complaint that the display was offensive.

But most citizens of the small Michigan town want the display to stay up as part of a decades-old tradition.

9 and 10 news reports:

A popular, long standing Christmas decoration is in risk of getting taken down after a civil rights group opposes it standing on top of a public elementary school.

“It’s just a symbol of our community it’s always been there and we love it,” says Amy Postma.

For decades the Three Wisemen have watched over Newaygo from high on top of the elementary school. Three wisemen heading towards the star of Bethlehem. A tradition for Newaygo, but possibly an illegal tradition, a failure to separate church and state.

People around town have been talking about the controversy over the weekend and very few want to have the decorations taken down.

“It would be just as ridiculous to say you can’t have Santa Claus in the bank taking pictures with kids,” says Postma, a lifelong Newaygo resident, “It’s a part of the festivities.”

Leftwing secularists have pushed the War on Christmas to new heights this year.

As we recently reported, a town in Ohio was forced to take down their nativity scene after receiving threats from the Freedom From Religion Foundation.

And another school in Nebraska banned Christmas colors, Christmas carols and candy canes.

Do you think that Christmas is offensive? Let us know in the comments!

Triggered Black Lives Matter activists just smeared a pro-lifer in the worst way


Pro-lifers are always under attack for simply sharing the plain truth about abortion.

And the radical Social Justice Warriors will do anything to silence pro-lifers completely.

But these Black Lives Matter activists just crossed the line with their outrageous smear against a pro-life speaker.

At Wheaton College in Illinois, the college Republicans invited African American pro-life advocate Ryan Bomberger to speak at an even called “Black Lives Matter, In and Outside the Womb.”

Students then complained that he made them feel “unsafe” and “unheard.”

And the school administration also condemned his visit entirely.

CBN writes:

Students at Wheaton College allege that an African American pro-life activist made them feel “unsafe” and “unheard” as he addressed racial justice and abortion during a campus forum.

Ryan Bomberger was invited by Wheaton College Republicans to speak at a campus-event called “Black Lives Matter, In and Outside the Womb.”

During the 50-minute presentation, Bomberger spoke about the impact abortions have on the black community. … Afterwards there was a 30-minute Q&A where students had the opportunity to ask questions. Bomberger also stayed after to answer additional questions.

Six days after the forum, Bomberger was criticized in an open letter by Student Body President Lauren Rowley, Student Body Vice President Tyler Waaler and EVP of Community Diversity Sammie Shields. In the letter to the university, they denounced Bomberger’s visit saying:

“The speaker…made several comments at the event that deeply troubled members of our community. His comments, surrounding the topic of race, made many students, staff, and faculty of color feel unheard, underrepresented, and unsafe on our campus.”

They also said it was necessary to respond to the offensive rhetoric, but they didn’t quote any specific comments they disliked. And Bomberger points out the letter writers did not name the special interest group that invited him nor his racial background.

The unnamed students and the school administration could also be facing a legal battle as Bomberger has accused the students and the school of “defamation.”

Bomberger simply exposed the Left’s hypocrisy in failing to defend the African American community inside the womb just the same as outside.

He also pointed out that Planned Parenthood originated as a plot from Democrats in the early 20th century from racists like Margaret Sanger.

But of course, the Leftists won’t accept the truth.

It’s easier to smear pro-lifers as hateful, bigoted, sexist and racist than to have an honest debate because they know they can’t win.

Colleges and Universities are supposed to be on the frontlines of intellectual, fervent debate.

But those debates can’t happen when snowflake students and school administrators won’t tolerate any opinions outside of their radical leftist worldview.

Do you think Wheaton College should issue an apology to Bomberger? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Brett Kavanaugh made a decision that had Planned Parenthood jumping for joy


Many pro-lifers stuck their necks out to defend Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation fight.

And radical pro-abortion activists were literally clawing on the doors of the Supreme Court to stop him from being sworn in.

But Justice Kavanaugh just made a decision that had Planned Parenthood jumping for joy.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the Supreme Court’s liberal justices to decline to hear a case that would allow states to defund Planned Parenthood.

This lawsuit marks the third time the Supreme Court refused to hear such a case.

Politico reports:

Tim Jost, an emeritus professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, said it’s “noteworthy” that Kavanaugh passed on the cases.

“If Kavanaugh was going to deal a major blow to health care rights during his first session on the court, this would have been the case to do it,” Jost said.

The anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List said it was “disappointed” the Supreme Court declined the case, as it called on the Trump administration to quickly finalize rules blocking federal funds to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers through the Title X family planning program.

“The pro-life citizens of states like Kansas and Louisiana, through their elected representatives, have clearly expressed their will: they do not want Medicaid tax dollars used to prop up abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood,” said SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser in a statement.

Many pro-lifers thought Justice Kavanaugh would be an immediate ally in the fight to end abortion.

But he has so far refused to lift a finger.

Meanwhile, conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch all voted to hear the case.

In order for a case to be heard before the Supreme Court, four justices must agree to hear it.

Justice Kavanaugh’s vote in favor would have been the one that tipped the scales.

This isn’t the first time conservatives were blindsided by Supreme Court Justices appointed by Republican presidents.

Chief Justice John Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, sided with liberal Supreme Court Justices in 2012 to uphold Obamacare.

And Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, sided with liberal Justices to force all states to accept gay marriage as a “right” guaranteed by the Constitution.

Is Justice Kavanaugh’s decision another example of a Republican SCOTUS pick stabbing pro-lifers in the back?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

A professor was threatened with rape after she opposed this transgender bill


Radical leftists will threaten anyone who dares disagree with them.

They will even threaten their own leftist friends who aren’t “progressive” enough.

And this professor was threatened with rape after she opposed this transgender bill.

At Reading University in the U.K., professor Rosa Freedman opposed a transgender reform act that would allow people to change their legal gender at a whim.

And as a result, Freedman says her door was covered in urine and was told she “should be raped.”

Christian Headlines writes:

A United Kingdom professor says her office door was “covered in urine” after she criticized a proposal that would make it easier for people to change their gender.

Rosa Freedman, a professor of law at Reading University, said she received threats and verbal abuse on social media and over the phone.

The government is considering changes to the Gender Recognition Act that would allow people to change their legal gender by mere self-identification. The current law allows a person to change his/her gender, although it’s more cumbersome.

Freedman opposes the changes and says they would harm women’s rights.

“I am deeply concerned by how the conflation of sex and gender is leading to subjugation of women and is undermining the specific protections guaranteed to women under international and national human rights law,” she has said.

She was called a “Nazi” and told she “should be raped,” the BBC reported.

“I’m pretty public and open about the fact that I’m Jewish,” Freedman said. “I’m pretty public and open about the fact I’ve survived sexual violence – I have been throughout these debates.

The professor is by no means a conservative. She even claims to be pro-LGBT.

There is no appeasing the Social Justice Warriors.

If you express anything other than 100% compliance with their radical agenda, you will be publicly shamed.

Sadly, this is nothing new on college campuses.

As we reported, a teacher in Virginia was fired for “misgendering” a so-called “transgender” student during class.

The SJWs want to completely eradicate anyone who opposes their radical agenda from education so they can brainwash the upcoming generations for decades to come.

And this is exactly why the defense of free speech is crucial.

Do you think Social Justice Warriors are getting out of hand? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

A college professor put God in the #MeToo movement with this blasphemous comparison


One of liberal academia’s favorite pastimes is coming up with new lies about Christianity.

They indoctrinate America’s youth with this propaganda.

But one professor said something about God that would make Satan proud.

Dr. Eric Sprankle, a Minnesota State University-Mankato psychology professor just compared God to a sexual predator on Twitter.

He says God impregnated the Virgin Mary without her consent.

He followed that with a sarcastic “Happy Holidays” quip:

But someone explicitly showed where God asked Mary for consent in Luke 1:38.

Dr. Sprankle instead doubled down on his sickening rhetoric to say that God was behaving in a “predatory” manner, comparing it to the #MeToo movement.

On Tucker Carlson’s show, Mark Steyn exposed him for the world to see.

Steyn, a Canadian political and cultural commentator, called the professor “banal and shallow.”

He said:

Basically, the idea that God has gotten the Virgin Mary back to his pad and she’s saying “I really must go” and He’s saying “baby it’s cold outside!” and puts some records on while [He] paw(s).

I miss the days when atheists were at least intelligent enough to take seriously what they were porting to knock down.

The stupidity and banality and shallowness and reductiveness of this is a dismal comment on the state of atheism in America.

Do you think the professor should be fired for comparing God to a sexual predator? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below

Watch the interview below:

A High School teacher was handed a pink slip for this outrageous reason


Leftists have an iron grip on Academia.

They are trying to eradicate anyone who holds Christian or conservative beliefs.

And now a High School teacher was handed the pink slip for this outrageous reason.

A French teacher at West Point High School in Virginia was unanimously fired by the school board for misgendering a so-called “transgender” student during class.

He said in an interview with NBC affiliate WWBT that he would not violate his “good conscience and faith” by calling the student a gender that does not correspond with their biological sex.

The school board didn’t like this.

The Daily Caller reports:

Vlaming has referred to the student as a female, according to the Times-Dispatch.

Misgendering refers to using biological pronouns for a transgender person as opposed to pronouns that accord with their new gender identity. Deadnaming refers to using the “dead name,” the name they used before transitioning, to describe or address a transgender person.

Vlaming’s avoidance of pronoun use made the transgender student feel singled out, according to the report.

“That discrimination then leads to creating a hostile learning environment. And the student had expressed that. The parent had expressed that,” West Point schools Superintendent Laura Abel said, the newspaper reported. “They felt disrespected.”

Following a complaint about Vlaming’s behavior, school administrators claimed that Vlaming had transgressed school harassment and nondiscrimination policies. “Mr. Vlaming was recommended for termination due to his insubordination and repeated refusal to comply with directives made to him by multiple WPPS administrators,” Abel said in a statement.

This high school teacher was fired for standing up for the biological truth established by our Creator.

The “repeated refusal to comply” was simply the act of refusing to bend to the will of a single transgender student and ignore the rules of biology.

Meanwhile, just down the road in Gloucester, Virginia, a federal judge is forcing Gloucester County Schools to allow transgender students use the bathroom of whatever gender they feel.

Even though, as we previously reported, a so-called “transgender” male sexually assaulted a classmate in the female bathroom.

Do you think as professor should be fired for refusing to misgender a student? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

The war on Christmas reached new heights with this attack on a town’s nativity scene


Christmas is under attack every year by the radical Left.

They do everything they can to take Christ out of Christmas.

But now the war on Christmas has reached new heights with this attack on the Ten Commandments and a town’s nativity scene.

In Dover, Ohio, city officials say they were forced to remove a statue of the Ten Commandments and a nativity scene from the city property after receiving threats from the atheist group Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).

FFRF has said the removal of the religious scene was in “defense of the First Amendment.”

Fox 8 Cleveland News writes:

DOVER, Ohio — Season’s greetings in Dover will look different this year after the mayor says the city was threatened with a lawsuit if they refused to move a statue of the Ten Commandments and a nativity display off city property.

“We have freedom of religion and they’re saying that we’re endorsing one religion,” said Dover Mayor Richard Homrighausen.

In a January letter, a Wisconsin based group — the Freedom from Religion Foundation– wrote the Dover mayor, stating an area resident reported about the displays including a large “Latin”cross.

The foundation stated the displays were a conflict, citing the separation between church and state. The mayor says the displays nearby city hall were moved to a nearby church property as a result this holiday season.

“Twenty-seven years been mayor, nothing like this has ever happened,” said the mayor. “Never imagined it would happen.”

The Freedom From Religion Foundation thinks they are “defending” the First Amendment.

But in reality they are attacking the very purpose of it, that anyone can exercise Freedom of religion.

No one can take that away as a constitutionally given right.

Unfortunately, this is not FFRF’s first rodeo with an attack on Christmas.

As we reported, they recently set up a “secular nativity scene” that depicts Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington watching the Bill of Rights in a manger.

In doing so they flat-out disrespect the purpose of Christmas in the birth of Jesus.

But they also show their true colors by demanding that religious displays be removed, and simultaneously demanding that they be allowed to set up their own atheistic displays.

This shows the hypocrisy of the radical left.

They want to completely disregard the Constitution unless they can twist it in their favor.

Do you think there is a war on Christmas? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

POLL: War on Christmas?


This transgender just outdid Bruce Jenner with this news


Americans were up in arms when Bruce Jenner was awarded “Woman of the Year” by ESPN in 2015.

That emboldened transgender activists.

And the latest award to be handed out to a transgender person will make your jaw drop.

A transgender woman (biological man) is favored to win the Miss Universe pageant.

Angela Ponce, a biological male who underwent so-called “gender reassignment surgery” to “become” female is the odds-on favorite to win the contest.

The 2018 Miss Universe Spain pageant winner is set at odds of 600+ to 1, compared to the Miss USA winner Sarah Rose Summers, who is set at 2000 to 1 odds.

The Daily Wire Reports:

As the gamblers put money on Ponce, the trans contestant has been using the press leading up to the December 16 contest to promote the transgender movement.

Asked by Time if the inclusion of a transgender contestant in this year’s competition would send a message to Trump, the former owner of Miss Universe, Ponce said, “More than a message to him, it would be a win for human rights.”

“Trans women have been persecuted and erased for so long. If they give me the crown, it would show trans women are just as much women as cis women,” said Ponce, who claims to have identified as female at the age of three.

Miss Universe announced in 2012 that it would allow biologically male contestants who identified as women after a successful lawsuit by a Canadian transgender model, Jenna Talackova, the Daily Mail notes.

Transgender activists want people to forget what they learned in biology class: that a man is a man and a woman is a woman.

They instead want people to follow a so-called “gender identity” system where biology is kicked out the door and there are an unlimited number of genders.

Do you agree with Miss Universe that beauty pageants should accept so-called “transgender” contestants?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

“Dirty Jobs'” Mike Rowe just gave one Good Samaritan the surprise of his life


Mike Rowe is beloved by blue collar Americans.

His show Dirty Jobs was a massive success and he’s since launched other new projects.

And you won’t believe the blessing he just gave to one Good Samaritan.

Mike Rowe recently launched a Facebook series called “Returning the Favor.”

The series follows Rowe as he travels across America to find people who are giving back to their communities.

On the latest episode, he surprised Good Samaritan Billy Mayhall with a $10,000 check and $30,000 worth of sports equipment to support his non-profit, STL Youth Sports Outreach.

STL Youth Sports Outreach is a non-profit whose goal is to ensure no child in the St. Louis area will be unable to participate in youth sports due to a lack of equipment.

KMOX reports:

STL Youth Sports Outreach is a not for profit, community based organization located in Overland, Mo., try to make sure no child in the St. Louis-area will be unable to participate in youth sports due to a lack of equipment.

Owner Billy Mayhall says some families are literally being priced out of their kids sports due to increasing team fees and rising prices for baseball gloves, soccer balls, footballs and golf clubs. So he and his volunteers spend two days per week giving out used equipment to kids and families who can’t afford it.

Now TV host Mike Rowe and his Facebook show “Returning the Favor” have helped make Mayhall’s job a little easier. The show’s goal is pretty simple. They find good people, doing good things and give them some help.

Rowe surprised Mayhall at his store in St. Louis and asked him to attend a St. Louis Cardinals baseball game. But that wasn’t the surprise.

Not only were Cardinals pitcher Adam Wainwright and Blues forward Vladimir Tarasenko at the game to give Mayhall a check for $10,000, but awaiting outside Busch Stadium was a truck with $30,000 worth of athletic equipment ready to be used by young athletes in the St. Louis area.

Sports teach children valuable lessons of teamwork, sportsmanship and more.

After this episode was released, Mayhall’s company made an additional $1,500 donation to his non-profit.

It’s actions like these that are often lost in today’s culture.

But they remind us all of what’s most important in life.

You can watch the latest episode of Mike Rowe’s “Returning the Favor” below: