These Radical atheists just made a mockery of the birth of Jesus with this display


Radical atheists have twisted the First Amendment.

They say it supports “separation of church and state” even though that is nowhere to be found in the Constitution.

But these Radical atheists just made a mockery of the birth of Jesus with this display.

On an Illinois courthouse lawn, a “secular nativity scene” was put up by the Freedom From Religion Foundation.

The scene by the FFRF depicts Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington watching the Bill of Rights in a manger.

This comes after the atheist group threatened a lawsuit with the county back in 2013, demanding that they take down the Christian nativity scene.

Christian Headlines writes:

An atheist group has placed a secular nativity scene honoring the “baby Bill of Rights” on an Illinois courthouse lawn to counter the traditional Jesus-centered nativity scene.

The secular scene, sponsored by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), shows cutouts depicting Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington “gazing adoringly” at the “baby” Bill of Rights in a manger, according to a news release from the organization. The Statue of Liberty is part of the display, too.

A sign accompanying the display reads, “Happy Winter Solstice. At this Season of the Winter Solstice, we honor reason and the Bill of Rights (adopted Dec. 15, 1791).” The bottom of the sign reads, “Keep State & Church Separate.”

The sign was placed on the Grundy County Courthouse lawn by FFRF members, three years after the county made the space available to other religions and non-religions. FFRF sent a letter to the county in 2013, threatening a lawsuit if the traditional nativity — with the baby Jesus — either wasn’t removed or was paired with other displays. The nativity is owned by the Morris Ministerial Association, according to the Morris Herald News. The secular scene was placed on the lawn in past years, too.

The FFRF says the display “exemplifies the take-charge spirit of members of the freethought organization.”

They don’t care about protecting the “freedoms” for all Americans like they claim.

This is how they wage war with the people they can’t stand the most: Christians.

They threaten and fear monger Christians until they get their way.

They specifically target and threaten Christian conservatives hoping to see the day Christianity is persecuted into extinction.

Do you think a real nativity scene should be allowed on a courthouse lawn? Let us know in the comments below.

Fixer Upper stars Chip and Joanna Gaines just made a move the media will hate


Chip and Joanna Gaines have been smeared by the leftwing media.

They hate the fact that the Gaines’ show Fixer Upper is such a hit and they’re unashamed of their Christian beliefs.

And Chip and Joanna just enraged the haters with their latest move.

For nearly three decades, the homeless in Waco, Texas have been served by the Church Under the Bridge – a small congregation that meets below Interstate 35.

But construction on I-35, which runs through the heart of Waco, could leave the Church Under the Bridge without a home.

That’s when Waco residents Chip and Joanna Gaines stepped up.

The Gaines’ offered the Church to use the lawn of their business, Magnolia Market at the Silos, for free.

Word & Way reports:

After the Waco Tribune-Herald reported on the church’s plight, Dorrell got a call from one of this city’s most famous residents: Chip Gaines, who with his wife, Joanna, starred in the HGTV home-improvement reality series “Fixer Upper.”

Gaines offered the lawn of Magnolia Market at the Silos — the couple’s popular tourist destination, which drew an estimated 1.6 million visitors to Waco last year — as a temporary home for Church Under the Bridge.

The attraction, which is closed on Sundays, is about four blocks from the bridge.

“I’ve known about Jimmy and the way he’s been selflessly serving this community for a while, since back when I was in college,” Chip Gaines, a Baylor alumnus, told Religion News Service in an emailed statement. “A few months ago, I read about how the I-35 project would impact his church, so we reached out to discuss his options and ultimately, to see if there was a way we might be able to help.

“I’ve always admired Jimmy from afar, so when we both agreed that the location of the Silos made sense for Church Under the Bridge, I knew we wanted to be part of the solution for this congregation,” Gaines added.

It’s a safe place for the congregation to gather and worship God together.

The Magnolia Market is closed on Sundays and located just a few blocks from where the Church Under the Bridge currently meets.

And after this story broke, the Gaines announced they were making a donation to The Cove for Giving Tuesday.

The Cove is an organization that serves the homeless youth of Waco.

They did not announce the total amount, but The Cove says it’s the largest gift they’ve ever received.

The Gaines’ generosity will allow The Cove to provide emergency housing for children.

Leftists hate nothing more than when Christians lead by example as our brother’s keeper.

They’d rather have everyone stuck on the government dole.

The fake news media just attacked the Christmas classic “Rudolph” for this crazy reason


The Huffington Post is known for claiming everything is “problematic.”

They take anything and everything and label it “racist,” “sexist,” and “homophobic.”

But the Huffington Post just stepped in it with this attack on a Christmas classic.

“Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” is a holiday classic, that is beloved by millions.

But the Huffington Post says that it is “problematic.”

They say it promotes racism, sexism, and homophobia.

The story of Rudolph is that he overcame adversity, not letting circumstance control his life.

But of course, the radical leftists at the Huffington Post don’t see any of that.

This is a prime example of how the so-called “progressives” have a twisted view of equality.

They want equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity.

Rudolph was born with a red nose. He was criticized by friends and family, but he was given the opportunity to prove himself worthy by leading Santa’s sleigh.

The reality is that people do have to overcome circumstances that they are born into.

And that message has resonated with millions of Americans, which is precisely why Rudolph is such a popular Christmas classic.

But leftists worship victimhood, so they don’t recognize “Rudolph” as a triumphant story.

Do you think “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” is “problematic?” Let us know in the comments below.

You can watch the video they posted on Twitter below:

How this Catholic high school caved into LGBT activists will leave you shaking your head in disbelief


LGBT activists salivate over the day when their deviant lifestyles will be accepted as normal.

And they’re working to erode the Catholic Church from within.

Now what this Catholic high school did to cave into LGBT activists will leave you shaking your head in disbelief.

Roncalli High, a Catholic high school in Indianapolis, Indiana, is now providing “safe spaces” for students who identify as homosexual.

The new program, titled “Encourage,” seeks to “fulfill God’s will in their lives” through providing “affirmation activities” for the homosexual students, the school’s official announcement says.

The Encourage program follows just months after the school placed their openly lesbian guidance counselor on paid leave due to her same-sex marriage.

Fox 59 Reports:

Supporters of Fitzgerald felt this program is a step in the right direction.

“I think it is very important to support these people especially at a time when they are not feeling very supported in this environment,” said Erin Rooney, a junior at Roncalli High School.

Fitzgerald was Rooney’s counselor. She supports Fitzgerald and the LGBT community so she was thrilled to hear about this program at her catholic school.

“I was a little concerned at first that it was going to be a form of conversion therapy, but again I think if it is managed correctly that it should be OK,” she said.

This isn’t the first time LGBT activists have successfully muscled their way into Catholic schools.

As we previously reported, a student at the Catholic John Carroll University was hauled into the president’s office for simply criticizing the existence of a Drag Show at the university.

Do you think Catholic schools should be encouraging homosexuality among their students? Let us know in the comments!

This late-night comedian just stepped in it with this crazy attack on the birth of Jesus


Hollywood will use anything to push their political agenda.

And their favorite punching bag is Jesus himself.

But this late-night comedian just stepped in it with this crazy attack on the birth of Jesus.

Samantha Bee is the host of the so-called “comedy” late-night show “Full Frontal.”

And she just released a promotional video for her Christmas special.

In it she makes fun of Jesus’ birth by likening him to an illegal immigrant being raided by I.C.E. and makes fun of Melania Trump for her White House decorations.

Christian Headlines writes:

The promotional video for the “Full Frontal” stars “Christmas on I.C.E.” special starts out by mocking Melania Trump’s debut of the White House Christmas decorations. To cheerful holiday music, Bee is first seen hanging a New York Times ornament that reads, “DETENTION OF MIGRANT CHILDREN AT HIGHEST LEVELS EVER,” on a snow-covered pine tree branch.

The TBS star moves on from the tree and breaks the fourth wall by talking directly to the audience saying, “Oh, hi there. I’m just getting ready for my holiday special.”

Suddenly, the music distorts as she continues saying, “Christmas is a time for families, even those families that we’ve separated.”

Bee goes on to share that money raised from the special will go to immigrant families to help bring them back together.

“Our special will raise money to help bring immigrant families back together, and we’ll have all the traditions you’ve come to expect — joy, the border wall, special guests, the birth of the Christ child,” she said.

As Bee is mentioning the birth of Jesus, action figures of I.C.E. agents are seen dropping in on the nativity scene as she yells, “Don’t answer the door!”

According to The Christian Post, Bee’s public position on immigration comes following the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy for illegal immigration. Opposition for this position has spotlighted the separation of children from their parents who crossed into the U.S. illegally starting this past June. The Christian Post notes, however, that families who go through the proper channels, such as seeking asylum, are not being separated at the border.

You can watch the video below:

Samantha Bee shows absolutely no respect for the birth of Jesus Christ.

She twists the message the Bible teaches to make a quick buck for her show and score political points.

But she has been on the hot seat for this type of behavior before.

Only five months ago Bee described Ivanka Trump as a “feckless c***” live on her own show.

She eventually apologized, but tried to defend herself pleading that she “uses it a lot on the show.”

The American people see her for who she really is: a smug, painfully unfunny political hack that claims to be a comedian.

What this Muslim Congresswoman is doing to import Sharia Law into the U.S. will make your blood boil


Ilhan Omar is Minnesota’s Muslim Congresswoman.

She made national headlines for statements about Israel, including asking “Allah to awaken the people and help them see Israel’s evil doings.”

And how she’s trying to import Sharia Law into the U.S. will make your blood boil.

Ilhan Omar is back in the news for proposing to lift the ban on wearing headwear in Congress so that she can wear her hijab.

And she has full backing from the Democrat Party.

The Hijab is a central tenet of Sharia Law.

Women have been arrested – and worse – in Islamic nations for refusing to wear it.

Huffington Post reports:

The change is part of a scope of new rules that Democrats are planning to implement once they take control of the House next year following their sweep of seats across the country during this month’s midterm elections. The party picked up at least 37 seats, wresting control from the Republicans after eight years.

Omar posted a screenshot of a news article related to the ban on Instagram late Sunday.

She also said it’s not the only ban she would work to lift, but didn’t specify any others.

The Washington Post notes that the proposed rule ― of which Omar is a co-author alongside House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) ― would allow all religious headwear on the House floor.

Democrats claim to support Omar wearing a hijab for “religious liberty.”

But they never cared about headwear when Jewish candidates were elected into public office.

There have been Jewish members of the Democrat Party in the House and Senate for over one hundred years and the Democrat Party never proposed to remove the headwear ban.

Rahm Emanuel wears a yarmulke as an orthodox Jewish person and was a congressman for years and the Democrat Party never discussed changing the rules for him.

He had to take his yarmulke off when he entered Congress.

Many believe the hijab is a symbol of oppression.

But many so-called “progressives,” including leaders of the anti-Trump “Women’s March,” have adopted it as a symbol of the “resistance.”

Do you think Congress should lift the ban on headwear so that Omar can wear her hijab?

Let us know your answer in the comments!

This mom is suing her son’s father for child abuse for this outrageous reason


LGBT activists want everyone to accept their radical views, or pay the price.

They will stop at nothing – even using their own children as political pawns.

And this mom is trying to take away parental rights form her son’s father for this crazy reason.

In Texas, a mother is taking her son’s father to court trying to take his parental rights away.

She says he is committing child abuse by “not affirming” the 6-year-old boy as transgender.

She also wants him to “pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations.”

The Daily Wire writes:

A Texas father is fighting for his son in court after pushing back on his ex-wife’s claim that their six-year-old is a transgender girl.

According to court documents, the young boy only dresses as a girl when he’s with his mother, who has enrolled him in first-grade as a female named “Luna.” The father, however, contends that his son consistently chooses to wear boys’ clothes, “violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home,” and identifies as a boy when he is with him.

The Federalist reports that the mother has accused the father of child abuse in their divorce proceedings “for not affirming James as transgender” and is looking to strip the dad of his parental rights. “She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight,” the report adds.

The father has been legally barred from speaking to his child about sexuality and gender from a scientific or religious perspective and from dressing his son in boys’ clothes; instead, he has to offer both girls’ and boys’ outfits. The boy consistently refuses to wear dresses, according to the father.

The boy was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist the mother, a pediatrician, chose for her son to see. According to the therapist’s notes, the boy chose to identify as a girl when he was in sessions alone with his mother; alternatively, he chose to identify as a boy when he was in sessions alone with his father.

This 6-year-old boy is obviously just very confused, because he is, surprise, 6 years old.

Most people don’t even remember anything from their 6-year-old lives, so how can we expect the boy to fully understand what gender even is?

The mother is clearly just a radical so-called “progressive” that is using her own son to make a political point and spite the father.

Sadly, children are the LGBT activists’ new target.

As we reported, this 11-year-old boy was paraded on Good Morning America as a “model drag queen.”

The radical left doesn’t care about the well-being of our youth.

They just want to brainwash them from a young age to see their fantasies come to life.

Who do you think should have custody of this child – the LGBT activist mother or the father who wants to raise his son to be a man?

Let us know in the comments below.

Donald Trump just made a big move on transgenders in the military


For years the radical leftists have been using the military as a social experiment.

They think their so-called “progressive” ideas are more important than defending our country.

But Donald Trump just made a big move on transgenders in the military.

President Trump just went to the Supreme Court to ask for an appeal on his transgender military ban that was struck down by a federal court.

This would be skipping the bureaucracy of the appellate court and get right down to the bottom of it all.

The New York Times

The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to leapfrog federal appeals courts in several cases concerning the president’s decision to bar transgender people from serving in the military.

Federal district courts have entered injunctions against the new policy, but no appeals court has yet ruled on it. The Supreme Court does not ordinarily intercede until at least one appeals court has considered an issue, and it typically awaits a disagreement among appeals courts before adding a case to its docket.

The Trump administration has, however, repeatedly asked the justices to hear appeals directly from district court rulings, most recently in several cases concerning its attempt to shut down a program that shields some 700,000 young undocumented immigrants from deportation. Like the ban on transgender service in the military, that policy has been blocked by federal trial judges.

In both sets of cases, Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco told the justices that prompt action was required to ensure that the Supreme Court could rule before its current term ended in June.

The Supreme Court’s rules say that it will review a federal trial court’s ruling before an appeals court has spoken “only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this court.”

President Trump knows that Americans are sick and tired of the radical leftists trying to get their claws on the military.

For decades the United States’ military has been the strongest on the planet for a reason.

The only goal of the United States’ military is to defend America.

To infiltrate the military with the “Social Justice” agenda will only erode the combat-readiness of our troops.

And in some cases, taxpayers are told to foot the $50,000 bill for active military transgenders to get a sex change if it is deemed “medically necessary.”

But to ban transgenderism from the military will simply return it to the no-frills operation that has kept America safe for hundreds of years.

Do you think transgenders should be banned from the military? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

What happened in this Rocky Mountain town will shock you


The LGBT movement is working tirelessly to normalize their deviant lifestyle in our culture.

They are working hardest on children since they are the most impressionable.

And you won’t believe the latest place where they were targeting children with their propaganda.

Boulder Public Library held a “Drag Queen Storytime” event on November 19.

The local government celebrated the event, tweeting out a picture showing at least 20 kids gathered around the drag queen reading a story.

The event received a wave of backlash on Twitter, with some Twitter users saying:

The LGBT movement will not stop until they have forced everyone to accept their lifestyle.

This is just the first step toward accomplishing this goal.

Do you think government libraries should host such events? Let us know in the comments.

Democrats just took a low blow against Christians that will make you see red


In 2012 Democrats got in hot water for removing the word “God” from their party platform.

Then in 2016 DNC attendees loudly booed when “God” was put back in.

And you won’t believe how Democrats attacked Christianity now.

The Massachusetts Democrat Party adopted a resolution saying Christians pose a threat to the United States.

The resolution was drafted by the secular Humanist Association.

It also recognizes religiously unaffiliated as “an important and growing demographic group worthy of respect, and aligned to values the Democratic Party supports.”

Christian News reports:

The Massachusetts Democratic Party has approved a resolution acknowledging nonreligious Americans, also known as “nones,” and stating that those who have used their “religious views to justify public policy” are “threatening not only the United States, but the entire planet.”

It claims that those who have used religion to define morality through public policy, as well as what is calls “misplaced claims of religious liberty,” are posing a threat to both the nation and the world.

“[T]hose most loudly proclaiming that morals, values, and patriotism must be defined by their particular religious views have often used those religious views to justify public policy that rejects well-established scientific consensus on issues such as evolution, sexuality, gender, women’s health, and climate change, thus threatening not only the United States but the entire planet,” the resolution states.

It says that the Democratic Party rather “recognizes that morals, values, and patriotism are not unique to any particular religion, and in fact are not necessarily reliant on having a religious worldview at all.”

Democrats think that by demonizing Christians they can win more votes.

They have already rid their party of anyone who considers themselves to be “pro-life.”

Democrats are embarrassed by the fact that our nation was founded by Christians and our Constitution is based in Christian principles.

They think if you are a Christian you should not use your fundamental belief in Truth to affect public policy.

Instead, Democrats would rather put their faith in government to decide right and wrong.

What do you think of the Democrats’ new resolution? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below!