Facebook tried to censor Franklin Graham and it backfired in a way they never expected


Silicon Valley tech giants are barely trying to hide their hatred for Christian conservatives.

No one gets under their skin more than Franklin Graham.

And their latest attempt to censor him blew up in their face.

Franklin Graham was banned by Facebook for a post that was two years old.

The advocate for Christ was banned for simply sharing a post, something millions of people do everyday.

The post was dated from 2016 and was a denouncement of the North Carolina Bathroom Bill, which would have allowed men to use women’s restrooms.

But Facebook was forced to lift the ban after they received backlash from Christian users.

Facebook tried to play it off as a “mistake.”

The Hill reports:

The representative went on to say that the mistake was made by the company’s content review team — which is comprised of 15,000 members — and that the company has since restored Graham’s account and the post in question.

The company has said it will also apologize to the administrator of Graham’s Facebook page, according to the spokesperson.

Graham took aim at the company over the incident in a post on Facebook on Friday.

“Why?” Graham asked in the post in reference to him being banned from the platform. “Because of a post from back in 2016 about North Carolina’s House Bill 2 (the bathroom bill). Facebook said the post went against their ‘community standards on hate speech.’ Facebook is trying to define truth.”

Facebook has been making a lot of “mistakes” this year.

Many of these “mistakes” have been banning, silencing, and suppressing prominent conservative voices.

They “mistakenly” shadow-banned Prager U, a conservative educational website that is hitting home with millennials.

And, as we previously reported, they rejected multiple ad applications for “Gosnell: The Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer,” an anti-abortion movie, from multiple Facebook users.

Facebook also “mistakenly” blocked Fox News Radio commentator Todd Starnes and apologized for it.

Do you think Facebook is silencing conservatives? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

What Antifa is planning to do next will make you sick to your stomach


The Fake News Media has downplayed Antifa as a “protest” organization.

But their communist history and ties to the USSR as a psy-ops organization has been documented meticulously by multiple university professors.

And now Antifa’s next move will have you up in arms.

Antifa is raising money on Patreon for a revolution.

The “Red Guards Austin” is using Patreon to raise money for “revolutionary violence.”

Red Guards Austin is an Antifa cell that recruits and radicalizes far-left extremists.

It has thousands of followers on Facebook.

Far Left Watch reports:

We have extensively reported on the violent and often illegal activity of Red Guards Austin (RGA). Like many Antifa cells, RGA uses tech platforms to recruit, radicalize, and mobilize other far-left extremists; this particular cell has almost eight thousand Facebook followers. While big tech companies have been systematically censoring conservatives and right-of-center influencers, violent far-left groups appear to be free to openly violate the Terms of Service for these platforms without any consequences. The same appears to be true with Patreon as this violent extremist group has an active account and explicitly says they are “creating revolution”.

Let’s take a deeper look at some of RGA’s “Mainfest Observable Behavior”.

In a blog post they published titled “In These Times Pacifists are Shameful“, they advocate for a violent revolution against capitalism.

“we must seriously take up the task not only of self-defense on the personal and community level, but we must also struggle to unite all genuine antifascists behind the necessity of revolution. Revolution means the long fight for communism and nothing less.”

Patreon has recently been under fire for site censorship of conservatives like YouTube stars James Allsup and Sargon of Akkad, saying their rhetoric is “dangerous.”

But they find no problem letting violent leftist groups stay on their service.

Even liberals such as Sam Harris have closed their accounts in protest of the service’s attack on conservatives, causing the company’s revenue to take a hit.

Yet Patreon continues to allow radical, far left terror organizations like Antifa to continue using the site.

Should websites like Patreon be supporting communist terror organizations? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

A student just settled with the University of Cincinnati in this groundbreaking case


Universities are becoming more hostile since the #MeToo movement.

Accusations are being thrown at completely unexpected victims.

But this student just won a precedent setting case against the University of Cincinnati.

A male student at the University of Cincinnati has been awarded $47,152 in addition to an end to his suspension.

The university had originally suspended him for accusations from a fellow classmate alleging he sexually assaulted her after having a Tinder date.

She said she was assaulted by someone of the same name, and so the university declared he must have been responsible.

But John, the male student’s name as it appears in the lawsuit, was exonerated after the lawsuit demonstrated there was no connection between him and the crime.

This is the first time the University of Cincinnati has ever settled with an accuser.

The Daily Wire reports:

The University of Cincinnati (UC) has agreed to pay a student $47,152 in attorneys’ fees and will end his suspension from the university and drop all disciplinary sanctions, according to WCPO Cincinnati. The outcome of the student’s school disciplinary hearing will not appear on his transcript, and the school will remove the “responsible” finding from his record. UC will also make no public statements about the case. The student, in turn, will not contact his female accuser or publicly disclose her identity.

This appears to be the first time UC has ever settled with an accused student.

The case arises from an incident involving John Doe and Jane Roe, as they are referred to in court documents reviewed by The Daily Wire, that occurred on September 6, 2015. The two UC students met on the dating app Tinder and sent messages back-and-forth for a little over two weeks before meeting in person.

A month later, Jane accused John of sexual assault.

She said the encounter occurred on August 30, 2015, that she met John on Tinder, but had agreed to meet him for dinner. She told a UC interviewer that she was going to study after the dinner, but John suggested she do so at his apartment, to which she agreed. She said she studied while sitting on his bed and drinking a glass of wine, which “lowered her inhibitions” about what she and John talked about. She said they flirted.

Jane said the two started kissing and that John “kept progressing” the physical contact, to which she never said “no.” The two engaged in oral sex and digital penetration. She said the two had sexual intercourse and that John tried to engage in anal sex.

The Daily Wire also points out that this is a landmark case because it reached the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which set a precedent stating that cross-examination is critical in a he said/she said situation.

This case could very well pave the way for more accusers to reach settlements with their accused.

Its also a breath of fresh air in the #MeToo era we live in where any woman can accuse a man and he is automatically guilty on the basis of the accusation alone.

This madness was demonstrated in the way the Democrats treated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during during his hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

They treated him as if he was already guilty, and when he naturally and rightfully got upset at the baseless accusations, they said he didn’t have the “temperament” to serve.

But Americans can see right through the leftists’ games.

Do you think universities should do more to protect young men from baseless accusations?

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

This state just screwed pro-lifers in the worst way


The pro-life movement has been winning skirmishes across the U.S.

But the pro-death camp has been tightening their iron fist in as many strongholds as possible.

And what abortion activists just pulled off in this state will make you seething mad.

Ohio’s Senate just voted down an anti-abortion measure that would have saved thousands of innocent unborn babies’ lives.

State House Bill 258, or the Ohio Heartbeat Bill, would have banned abortions if there was a detectable heartbeat.

This would have banned all abortions after 6 weeks.

But Governor John Kasich and the Ohio Senate decided that Planned Parenthood and other abortion strongholds should continue slaughtering 20,000 unborn babies a year.

LifeSite news reports:

Last week, Kasich explained his reasons for vetoing the bill: “[H.B. 258] is contrary to the Supreme Court of the United States’ current rulings on abortion. As the losing party, the state of Ohio will be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to cover the legal fees for the pro-choice activists’ lawyers.”

But pro-life advocate Janet Folger Porter told State News that this heartbeat bill is different.

“This is the bill that was crafted exactly for the Supreme Court. It was meant from its birth, from its conception, to be before the court. Nothing else needs to be done to this and anything else is a delay that not only hurts its chances for override, it can kill the bill and the babies it is meant to protect,” Folger Porter said.

As we previously reported, Governor John Kasich vetoed this bill to the delight of Planned Parenthood and abortion activists all across Ohio.

He claimed the courts would have struck it down, but he didn’t even give the bill a chance before the court to see if that would have been the case.

And now the Ohio Senate has also decided that the murder of 20,000 unborn babies is right as rain.

Abortion lobbyists and those of the pro-death camp will continue to advocate slaughtering innocent unborn babies as a basic human right.

And politicians like John Kasich and members of the Ohio Senate are just fine with that.

Should abortion be banned? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

The Leftwing Hollywood media attacked Christian actor Chris Pratt in the most despicable way


Chris Pratt is the star of hit movies including Jurassic World and Guardians of the Galaxy.

But the leftist media hates him because he is unashamed of his Christian faith.

And the Hollywood elites launched an attack on him that was truly despicable.

Chris Pratt delivered an incredible Scripture reading of the Gospel of Luke at Disneyland’s annual Candlelight Processional in December.

At the 2018 MTV Movie awards, Pratt listed out his “nine rules” including “God is real. God loves you. God wants the best for you. Believe that. I do.” during his acceptance speech.

Now, TV Guide recently thrashed Chris Pratt in a new hit piece for being a “successful, straight white man,” The Epoch Times reports.

The piece, part of a series titled “12 Days of Chris-Mas,” labeled him “the most divisive of the Chrises.”

The series covers 12 “famous dudes named Chris,” and took special care to make sure people didn’t feel “hate” for themselves due to Chris Pratt’s existence and his more conservative lifestyle.

The article then went on to list some of the “problematic aspects” of Chris Pratt’s life, including attacking him for being a hunter and an animal farmer:

Adding fuel to this particular fire is the fact that Pratt, an avid hunter who has often spoken about his love of hunting, currently raises lambs on his farm. The enthusiastic tone he took when speaking about “eating fresh farm-to-table lamb” in an Instagram video earlier this year…

This smear was a direct denouncement of what thousands of American farmers do to ensure we have fresh meat at the supermarket, restaurants, and in our freezers.

The hit piece also nitpicked him for standing up for blue-collar America.

Apparently, fighting for an “average, blue-collar American” representation in Hollywood is demeaning to a mysterious list of unrepresented communities that the hit piece failed to name:

But the truth is, the reason Pratt’s comment enraged so many people is because it ignored the fact there are a number of communities actually struggling for better representation, communities that have been fighting for a very long time to see themselves on TV and film.

This TV Guide hit piece revealed the deep-seated prejudice that the left has for traditional American values.

And it shows the Hollywood elitists can’t stand anyone who doesn’t cave into their leftwing ways.

What do you think about the media attacking Chris Pratt for his Christian faith? Let us know your thoughts below.

The LGBT activists are suing this library for this despicable reason


LGBT activists won’t stop until everyone caves in to their morally void fantasies.

And they will threaten anyone who gets in their way.

But what these LGBT activists are doing to this library is just ridiculous.

More public libraries are hosting “Drag Queen Story Time” events in which drag queens read books to children to promote LGBT propaganda.

But in LaFayette, Louisiana, the city library is being sued by the American Civil Liberties Union for denying “Drag Queen Story Time.”

The lawsuit claims that the library’s requirement to sign a form disavowing any affiliation with the “Drag Queen Story Time” violates the First Amendment.

Christian Headlines writes:

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed suit against the LaFayette Public Library in Louisiana after officials made the decision to prohibit Drag Queen Story Time events, since the library had previously been sued by two other groups for making preparations to present an event on the grounds.

“The defendant’s requirement that individuals seeking to use library space sign a form disavowing affiliation with Drag Queen Story Time as a precondition for use of public space and also under penalty of potential legal liability violates the First Amendment,” the lawsuit declares.

Reports claim that the LaFayette Public Library had scheduled a “Drag Queen Story Time” event to take place in October, but was quickly sued by members of the groups Warriors for Christ and Special Forces of Liberty. The lawsuit asserts that two of the plaintiffs, who are a part of Special Forces of Liberty, classify themselves as polygamists.

The legal challenge voiced criticism in regards to a “government endorsed effort to brainwash and indoctrinate minors to religious (secular humanist) worldviews on sex, faith, truth, gender, morality, and marriage in a manner that excessively entangles the government with the religion of postmodern-western-individualistic-moral relativism.”

Officials with the LaFayette Public Library chose to “stand down” while the legal challenge unfolded in court, and are supposedly requesting that those who want to host events at the library sign a form that confirms that “the purpose of [their] use of the Lafayette Public Library’s meeting room does not pertain in any way to ‘Drag Queen Story [Time],’ directly or indirectly.”

As Christian Headlines points out, the LaFayette Public Library had originally scheduled “Drag Queen Story Time,” but was also sued by a religious liberty group claiming that the government ought not to endorse the worldviews of the LGBT activists.

No kid needs to be brainwashed by the ridiculous fantasies of grown men who dress up as women.

And the argument that the library is violating the First Amendment by requiring the “Drag Queen Story Time” sign a disavowal form is just preposterous.

Nothing in the First Amendment dictates that the library is forced to allow drag queens to read to young boys and girls.

The library is a victim of the threaten-then-sue tactics of the radical left.

They want complete obedience to their so-called “progressive” agenda.

And they won’t take anything less than total agreement.

Do you think the library should be forced to have “Drag Queen Story Time?” Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Barbie is getting a makeover that has LGBT activists jumping for joy


Barbie and Ken have been American icons for over 50 years.

Leftists hate Barbie because she promotes traditional feminine qualities and even marriage to millions of little girls nationwide.

But secret plans were leaked from toymaker Mattel, and you won’t believe what they’re releasing next.

Mattel is reportedly meeting with a so-called “gay power couple” to discuss the possibility of homosexual Barbie dolls.

Matt Jacobi and Mick Caprio are pushing for homosexual Barbie dolls because, according to them, “it’s going to come up in your family no matter what.”

ABC 15 reports:

Since the 1960’s it’s always been Ken and Barbie. The two have been paired for 57 years.

So Matt and Nick started lobbying the makers of Ken and Barbie, toy giant Mattel, asking them to consider adding same-sex couples to their wedding sets.

Their plan worked. The two are now meeting with Mattel designers next week in Los Angeles. They’re hoping this meeting could change toy aisles around the world.

As Patriot Pulse reported, in 2017 Mattel released a Barbie doll with a hijab to the praise of leftists including Chelsea Clinton.

LGBT activists will stop at nothing to push their lifestyle on everyone.

From toys to the education system, they won’t stop until the entire world bends to their views of love and sex.

Do you think Mattel should make a homosexual Barbie? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Planned Parenthood’s new president just stuck her foot in her mouth with this statement


Planned Parenthood’s new president Leana Wen is their most radical president yet.

She is doubling down on disguising Planned Parenthood as “Women’s healthcare.”

But she just stepped in it with this outrageous claim.

President of Planned Parenthood, Leana Wen, took to Twitter to clarify her thoughts on Planned Parenthood’s services.

She said she “wants to be clear” that all of Planned Parenthood’s services “from birth control to cancer screenings and abortion, are standard medical care.”

She, and Planned Parenthood as a whole, wants to hide abortion behind the guise of “women’s healthcare services” that are “critical.”

But Planned Parenthood doesn’t even provide mammograms, so their claim to be “women’s healthcare” doesn’t pass the most basic smell test.

To signify just how important this false illusion is to her, she has even pinned a tweet of her interview with CNN where she claims “reproductive healthcare” (she means abortion) is a human right.

The human rights she, and the Abortion Lobby at whole, fails to recognize are the ones that they violate when they abort little boys and girls by the hundreds of thousands.

They only want to defend the “rights” of the women who are keeping their bloody business going.

And they are even planning on keeping abortion around here in the U.S. even if it becomes illegal.

As we reported, Planned Parenthood released a plan called “Care For All” where they outline how they want to grow their business if abortion is outlawed.

The Abortion Lobby doesn’t care for anyone, and will do anything to keep their business going.

Which is exactly why we need pro-life legislators to stand up for what they say they believe in, and start by defunding Planned Parenthood.

Do you think Planned Parenthood is evil? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

A ruling came down in this transgender lawsuit, and it will leave you shaking your head


LGBT activists are completely deranged.

They want to allow so-called “transgenders” to use whatever bathroom they want and compete in any sport depending on which gender they “feel” like.

And what this “transgender” woman just did had the LGBT activists grinning ear to ear.

In Minnesota, a biological male identifying as a woman, Christina Ginther, sued an all women’s football team back in 2017 when he was told that only women could play in the league.

He said he felt as though he wasn’t “worthy” enough to be on the team.

And now the court just ruled in Ginther’s favor, awarding him $20,000 in damages.

Christian Headlines writes:

Christina Ginther, who was born male, tried out for the Minnesota Vixen in the Independent Women’s Football League but was told biological males were not allowed to play due to safety issues, according to Minnesota Public Radio (MPR).

“I hung up the phone and just felt violated,” Ginther, 46, said. “I mean, just the sense of, ‘I’m a freak. I’m a defective. I am not worthy to be with this team.’”

The Vixen is a semi-pro team and does not pay its players.

Ginther sued in 2017 and was awarded $20,000 in damages from a jury this month. The jury ruled the league had violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act and should have let Ginther play.

“And the Vixen were arguing, ‘You know, this is just football.’ I was just really happy with my lawyer. He said, ‘That’s kind of the same story. It’s only football. It’s only a bus seat. It’s only a bathroom. But it isn’t. … We’re talking about human dignity,” Ginther told MPR.

While the lawsuit was in process, Ginther joined a different women’s football league, the Women’s Football Alliance, which allows transgender women to play.

There is literally no purpose of having an all women’s league if biological men can join.

The whole point of having separate leagues for the genders is because they will dominate each other in specific sports.

Ginther performed well on the field because he is a male playing with women.

Even the weakest men have up to three times as much testosterone as the strongest women in the world. And in a sport like football, that goes a long way.

The LGBT activists have a serious problem on their hand.

They want to support the feminist agenda in helping all women, but they also want to “approve” of the transgender fantasy.

As we reported, a biological male who identifies as a woman just competed and won the women’s 2018 UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships.

This has ended up being a competition amongst radical leftists to see who can be the most “progressive.”

And there is no end in sight.

The Liberal media’s new LGBT posterboy just revealed how twisted they really are


The left has been on a propaganda campaign promoting unscientific notions of gender.

They want everyone to believe the lie that there are infinite genders on a sliding scale.

But the left’s latest LGBT posterboy for their disgusting PR campaign just revealed their true colors.

The left is beginning to weaponize children in the war on culture.

It started when Good Morning America interviewed an 11-year-old “drag kid” named Desmond.

Then Desmond got a “performance” gig dancing at a gay bar, where patrons threw cash at him, that made national headlines.

The liberal media sung their praises, advocating the “tolerance” of children such as Desmond.

Now, CNBC just made the child the posterboy of the left’s grotesque LGBT campaign in a new video.

The Daily Wire reports:

CNBC, which is owned by NBC Universal News Group, showcased the child as an “LGBTQ youth” advocate. “This 11-year-old drag kid is using his voice to encourage LGBTQ youth to be themselves,” reads the media company’s caption to the video.

In December, the 11-year-old boy, dressed in full-drag as a Gwen Stefani-lookalike, danced on stage at a gay bar in Brooklyn, New York, called 3 Dollar Bill. As he took off his coat and revealed his outfit, he bounced around onstage to No Doubt’s “Like a Girl”; cheering grown men were handing him single dollar bills, as you might see in a strip club.

As previously reported by The Daily Wire, Desmond was promoted by NBC’s TODAY Show in June. “Meet the 10-year-old ‘drag kid’ taking over social media with inspiring message,” reads the caption video on Desmond. Left-wing site The Daily Beast gushed over Desmond’s drag and his progressive parents in a disturbing piece from February titled, “RuPaul Loves ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond. You Will Too. Fiercely.” The young child has been relentlessly praised and promoted by drag queen RuPaul, the host of VH1’s RuPaul’s Drag Race. When Desmond was just seven years old, he was featured in a music video for Season Six winner of RuPaul’s Drag Race Jinkx Monsoon. In the video, Desmond dances on top of a bar in a red dress, long gloves, and jewelry. As an 8-year-old, the child was introduced on a NYC stage in full-drag by actor Tituss Burgess.

The left’s weaponization of a child for their propaganda campaign is sickening.

But it doesn’t stop there. As we previously reported, LGBT activists in Britain were caught loading autistic kids with gender-bending drugs after telling them they weren’t the gender they were born with.

Sadly, many parents these days see themselves as LGBT activists first and parents second.

So they see no issue with using their child as a pawn to virtue signal to their “progressive” friends.

Do you think the left has gone too far? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below