A top border state politician just hit Nancy Pelosi hard over the Left’s hypocrisy


Democrats are taking flak from all sides since Trump suggested releasing immigrant detainees in so-called “sanctuary cities.”

Pelosi and her cohorts fumed at the plan Trump floated demonstrating how utterly hypocritical they are.

But Pelosi’s attempt to get back “on message” with her rabid liberal base backfired when she got smacked hard by this top border state politician.

Ever since President Trump floated his plan to release illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities located mainly in Democrat Congressional Districts, Nancy Pelosi and her caucus have been taking fire from every angle.

Even Hollywood Liberals like Cher have pushed back against sanctuary cities in the days since Trump exposed Congressional Democrats for the hypocrites they are.

At first Pelosi and her allies fumed, stomping their feet in protest while trying to paint the President as the bad guy for offering to give them what they’ve been pushing on the rest of the country for so long.

Of course, Pelosi’s been in the Swamp for a long time and it wasn’t long before she was trying to get her troops back on message so Democrats wouldn’t lose their base.

In a recent appearance on CNN, Pelosi attempted to brush over her hypocrisy by saying “these newcomers make America more American.”

But Texas Republican Lieutenant Governor, Dan Patrick wasn’t about to let her get away with talking out of both sides of her mouth.

People in his state live with the crisis day-in and day-out and see what’s really happening.

Patrick went on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program and let Pelosi have it, saying “it is almost treasonous what she’s doing, selling out this country.”

But he didn’t stop there, alleging that Pelosi’s immigration reform obstructionism makes her basically “a slaveholder” with the plight of young immigrant women.

Newsweek reports:

Speaking with Laura Ingraham on Fox News Wednesday, Dan Patrick responded angrily to the House Speaker’s recent suggestion that “these newcomers make America more American,” and that the president exploited economic concerns among voters to turn them against migrants. “I don’t think that’s where the American people really are,” Pelosi told CNN.

Patrick told Ingraham, “When I hear something like that from soft-spoken Nancy like she seems to care, it is almost treasonous what she’s doing, selling out this country.”

Patrick went on to blame Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for the plight of young migrants who risk their lives trying to make it across the southern border. “I view her as nothing more than a slaveholder because she’s in charge of not helping these people, these poor young girls,” Patrick said of Pelosi.

“These poor young girls, they are trapped in cantinas and bars all over this country. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are responsible for this.”

The Left’s “not in my backyard” position that Trump exposed showed how two-faced liberals like Pelosi are.

But then to turn around and immediately speak out of the other side of her mouth in order to hold onto power shows how arrogant and power hungry the Left really is.

And while she’s refusing to fund the border wall and claiming how great illegal immigration is, she’s turning a blind eye to the plight of young girls being trafficked across our southern border.

This is yet another situation that shows the Left’s ignorance when it comes to reality.

What do you think? Are Pelosi and the Democrats hypocrites when in it comes to illegal immigrants and protecting women and children?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Beto’s campaign is on deathwatch after he was asked this one burning question


Beto O’Rourke became an overnight media sensation when he ran against Ted Cruz.

Now he’s a leading contender for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2020.

But his campaign is on deathwatch after he was asked this one burning question in a town hall meeting.

The Democrat race for president is quickly becoming a race to the far Left as the base of the party embraces even more radical socialist policies.

And in typical socialist fashion, this slew of candidates is hellbent on forcing Americans to cough up more and more of their tax dollars to be redistributed for their socialist utopia.

But O’Rourke found himself in hot water when his tax returns showed he donated less than 1% of his hefty income to charitable causes.

Over the last decade, O’Rourke’s average income was nearly $350,000, but he donated a measly $2,400 on average per year, or 0.7% of his income.

In 2017, the media darling made a staggering $366,455, but his charitable donations were less than one-third of one-percent: $1,166.

This is a common theme among Democrats.

Bernie Sanders, another radical socialist, also donated less than 1% in his first million-dollar earning year in 2016.

Democrat presidential candidates want to take more of your tax dollars and dole them out using the government so they get credit for “helping the poor.”

But when it comes to giving to the poor and needy using their own income, it’s clear they prefer to keep their own pockets stuffed.

One student at the University of Virginia brought up O’Rourke’s charitable giving, asking why her sister, a woman just one year out of college and makes a lot less money than O’Rourke, donated more to charity.

And his answer has him in hot water.

I’ve served in public office since 2005. I do my best to contribute to the success of my community, of my state, and now, of my country. There are ways that I do this that are measurable and there are ways that I do this that are immeasurable. There are charities that we donate to that we’ve recorded and itemized, others that we have donated to that we have not.

But I’m doing everything that I can right now, spending this time with you — not with our kiddos, not back home in El Paso — because I want to sacrifice everything to make sure that we meet this moment of truth with everything that we’ve got.

So unlike most conservative Americans – especially Christians – who give their hard-earned money to charity, O’Rourke’s charitable gift to all us taxpayers is “Beto O’Rourke” and his “sacrifice” is demanding everyone else cough up more money so he can pay for his socialist utopian vision.

What do you think? Do you think this could sink Beto’s campaign for president?

Let us know in the comments.

Chip and Joanna Gaines landed on a list that made Tim Tebow take notice


Chip and Joanna Gaines are the stars of the home makeover show “Fixer Upper.”

They’ve become American icons despite our culture attacking them for their Christian faith.

And now they just ended up on a list that made Tim Tebow sing their praise.

Chip and Joanna Gaines were named one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people.

In an era with popular culture pushing filth through our TV screens, the homey couple are proud of their faith and family.

And Tim Tebow wrote a tribute to them.

Tebow wrote, “Joanna and Chip Gaines are two incredible people with incredible hearts.”

“Through remarkably hard work, Jo and Chip have created a platform to be able to impact lives with extreme generosity,” the former NFL quarterback praised.

Tebow appeared on an episode of “Fixer Upper” where they designed and built a home for a family with two special needs children.

Tebow said, “On ‘Fixer Upper,’ when I helped Jo and Chip build an accessible home for a family with two children in wheelchairs, I saw firsthand the genuine passion they have for making a difference in people’s lives.”

And unlike many television stars these days, Tebow said of the Gaineses, “They are also grounded in a strong faith, which keeps them focused on what truly matters in life. People matter. Loving people matters. And Jo and Chip are amazing at loving people.”

Do you think Chip and Joanna Gaines belong on Time’s 100 most influential people?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Snowflakes hissed when Mike Pence was invited to this campus and got smacked down by the last person imaginable


Liberals love to go mad over any perceived slight.

Raging in protest over any conservatives on campus is a favorite event in the Left’s daily “Outrage Olympics.”

But their temper tantrum over the Vice President showing up just got them owned by one prominent figure they never saw coming.

America’s colleges are infested with whiney, left-wing student radicals and activist faculty who throw a fit any time they see an opportunity to try and silence conservatives.

Sadly, not even evangelical Christian colleges are immune to the Left’s campaigns to snuff out traditional Christian values and silence conservative voices.

And when Taylor University invited Vice President Mike Pence to speak at their commencement this year, leftists threw a fit, launching a Change.org petition.

They wanted the school’s leadership to cave and disinvite Pence.

Student radicals even trotted out for media interviews, attempting to justify their ludicrous attempt to silence the Vice President with scripted statements like how the university “should be ashamed…I am physically shaking…I feel personally attacked.”

Taylor’s leadership rebuked the brat activists stating the school “is an intentional Christian community that strives to encourage positive, respectful and meaningful dialogue.”

The school stood firm saying, “We look forward to hosting the Vice President.”

But Reverend Franklin Graham has had enough of the Left’s despicable culture war tactics.

Graham took to Facebook asking, “What are these people smoking?”

The Christian dignitary, who’s respected nearly universally, then continued the smack down in the most loving way possible stating: “This reminds me of Paul’s words, ‘You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you?’”

Christian Headlines reports:

Thousands of students, alumni, and allies of the small evangelical college, Taylor University, are protesting Mike Pence’s May commencement speech at their school.

“Inviting Vice President Pence to Taylor University and giving him a coveted platform for his political views makes our alumni, faculty, staff and current students complicit in the Trump-Pence Administration’s policies, which we believe are not consistent with the Christian ethic of love we hold dear,” a change.org petition read.

Taylor alumnus Alex Hoekstra started it. “As an alumni of Taylor and as a gay man I’m pretty personally injured by the policies of the Trump/Pence administration and I know that a lot of alumni who identify as other minority groups are personally affected by the Trump/Pence administration,” he told Newsweek.

But not all alumni share Hoekstra’s concern. Kevin Holtsberry, another alumnus, shared with Fox & Friends, “The vice president has very orthodox Christian beliefs – very traditional beliefs – that a vast majority of Christians believe. His political views are shared by a large section of America, so it’s not a radical choice, and I think people should be able to engage and disagree with his views and do it in a mature fashion.”

Taylor University leadership is holding firm to its decision despite the backlash.

“Since making the announcement of Vice President Mike Pence’s upcoming commencement speech, we have received feedback from people on either side of the issue. Taylor University is an intentional Christian community that strives to encourage positive, respectful and meaningful dialogue. We look forward to hosting the Vice President next month,” Taylor University spokesman, James Garringer, said in a statement to Fox News.

Franklin Graham was disappointed in the student’s actions. The evangelist took to Facebook to ask, “What are these people smoking?” He continued, “This reminds me of Paul’s words, ‘You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you?’ (Galatians 3:1). Vice President Mike Pence recently told CNN that he is ‘a Bible-believing Christian.’ Is that what they are objecting to?”

Many of the students have taken the news personally. According to Fox News, one Taylor grad said the school, “should be ashamed…I am physically shaking…I feel personally attacked.”

This is yet another example of the intolerance of the so-called “tolerant Left.”

Of course, demonstrating love and respect for fellow human beings isn’t at all what the Left wants.

They want to stop any speech they disagree with and they’ll use whatever tactic they can, especially on our college campuses.

They believe it’s their “turf” and that by shutting down actual intellectual debate in America’s colleges, they not only silence conservatives, but also steer the next generation toward their radical ideology.

Leftists have become more and more unhinged since the Trump-Pence ticket took what they thought was Hillary’s or Bernie’s White House in 2016.

Now the Left’s so-called “tolerance” often means outright violence committed against those they disagree with.

But it might be the lesser forms of tyranny being pushed by student radicals, the left-wing faculty, and school administrators in America’s colleges today that are most dangerous.

Left-wing professors spoon feed radical views to impressionable students and coerce those who dare think for themselves into silence by holding grades over their heads.

Radicalized students shout down free thinkers who dare stand up, and college administrators refuse to stop any of it.

In fact, all too often they’re willing accomplices in drowning out conservative thought and undermining America’s students.

That’s not surprising when the vast majority of them leech on the promise of higher education bilking taxpayers and students alike.

Tragically, these supposed educators are turning out not just a generation of snowflakes, but worse: a generation of indentured servants facing decades of student loan payments.

And for all these “educations” are costing, the biggest toll may be that the leftists being radicalized on college campuses are learning how to throw temper tantrums really well, while others are just being taught to shut up and keep their heads down when bullies show up.

The good news is, there are still religious leaders like Franklin Graham inspiring Americans to stand up to bullies.

Likewise, institutions of higher education with leaders who refuse to back down when left-wing activists target campuses and attack Vice President Pence.

What do you think? Are leftists in academia intolerant?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Chuck Schumer Used One Word to Describe an Anti-Infanticide Bill and Trump isn’t Happy


Abortion has become a huge topic on the state and federal level.

States like New York have removed restrictions on late-term abortions, causing uproar among many Americans.

And you won’t believe what Chuck Schumer said to describe Republican efforts to pass an Anti-Infanticide Bill.

Pro-lifers know babies in the womb deserve the same safety and protection as a newborn would receive.

But the decision to save innocent newborns is in jeopardy thanks to Chuck Schumer’s and Nancy Pelosi’s efforts.

After a slew of Democrat lawmakers defended the gruesome process of letting babies die after they survived a botched abortion, Republicans in the House, led by Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner, sought to push a bill that guaranteed the safety of newborn children.

The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act is a bill to ensure babies born alive during an abortion are given the same medical care as any other newborn baby.

It had strong bipartisan support among voters.

Rep. Steve Scalise and Ann Wagner say, “86 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents support this legislation.”

Why a bill that guarantees the safety of newborn babies is even needed has many peoples’ heads spinning.

But when states are allowing late-term abortions up to the moment of birth and even defending the murder of newborn babies, action is required.

With a Democrat-controlled House, however, a discharge petition would be needed to mandate a vote.

If a majority of House members signed it, it would be brought to the floor for a full debate and vote, regardless of objections from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The bill ultimately failed to get enough Democrat support.

And when Chuck Schumer was asked whether leaving babies to die on a hospital table was actually infanticide, Schumer described the effort to save these newborn babies as “Bogus.”

You know,” Schumer said, “this issue has been brought up over and over again. It’s bogus in terms of how our Republican friends are interpreting this.”

Schumer claims infanticide is “already illegal,” but the fact is leaving babies to die is legal in almost half the country.

Only 26 states have laws mandating doctors provide medical care to infants born alive during a botched abortion.

It’s a shame congressional leaders like Chuck Schumer can’t unequivocally state the killing of a newborn baby is wrong.

But Schumer only cares about one thing: consolidating and holding onto his power.

No doubt President Trump is disgusted by the opposing party’s decision to defend infanticide.

They are, after all, becoming the party of late-term abortions and infanticide.

What do you think? Should Trump sign an executive order making the murder of unborn children illegal?

Let us know in the comments!

A Catholic school administrator used three words to describe the cross of Jesus that will infuriate you


Leftist so-called “progressives” are taking over college campuses all over America.

Now, Catholic schools are no longer immune to their takeover.

And what this one Catholic school administrator said about the cross of Jesus is truly despicable.

Students for Life of America, a leading campus-oriented pro-life organization, is currently on a #PlannedParenthoodTruth Tour to expose the truth about Planned Parenthood’s bloody business.

As a part of that tour, Students for Life is bringing their 911 pink cross display to each campus.

Each pink cross represents the the life of one little boy or girl who loses their life at the hands of Planned Parenthood abortionists every day.

The Students for Life group at Dominican University, a Catholic school, got approval to set up the pink cross display on campus grounds.

But as soon as the Students for Life group was done setting up the display, a school administrator ordered them to take it down, saying it “creates unnecessary harm.”

Even worse, in conversation with the Students for Life group, a school staffer flat-out defended abortion saying it is better that babies be aborted than grow up in an abusive environment.

Students for Life reports:

In the meeting, in a conversation captured with audio, Price tells Minnich,

“I think the crosses are a message, that could be more, would evoke more of an emotional cross, than is what we are looking for. I am all about folks sharing different perspectives, I believe in what you’re doing….where we start to do other catchy things, to really characterize the message that we’re selling, if that creates unnecessary harm…that’s where I start to get worried.”

He also tells Sarah that the crosses could “create harm.”

Outside at the display, another person, believed to be a staffer or administrator, said she is ‘pro-life’ but she is also pro-choice, which includes ending a human life. Following this, there is a back and forth where a pro-choice staffer/administrator says that it is better that babies be aborted than growing up in an abusive environment or in an area where there is gang crime [Dominican University is roughly 15 miles from the South Side of Chicago].

The idea that the cross of Jesus could “create unnecessary harm” – especially at a Catholic school – is simply ridiculous.

It’s a symbol of the sacrifice of Christ, and any true Catholic wouldn’t be ashamed to use it to defend the lives of innocent little boys and girls.

The school administrator is only saying that because some young leftist snowflake feminist will get “triggered” by the moving display of 911 crosses.

And he doesn’t want to come under fire from the progressive Left.

But pro-life students all over the country experience this censorship of their beliefs on a regular basis.

And this type of behavior has happened to Students for Life like clockwork.

As you can see from this video they posted on their Facebook page, pro-abortion radicals often resort to violence to try to intimidate pro-life students into shutting up.

The fact is, pro-abortion viewpoints aren’t consistent with Catholicism or Christianity as a whole.

Anyone like the Dominican University staffer who defends abortion simply gives Christianity and Jesus Christ a bad rap.

And as Jesus Christ said himself “but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.” (Matthew 10:34b)

Do you agree with the Catholic school administrator that banned this pro-life display of crosses?

You’ll never guess what one city is doing to wage war on Chick-fil-A


Chick-fil-A has inexplicably become a primary target of LGBT activists.

They are determined to sabotage the delicious fast food chicken chain over their Christian values.

And you’ll never guess what one city council decided to do to wage war on Chick-fil-A.

Ever since the Left failed to launch a boycott of the fast food chain, Chick-fil-A has become one of their favorite targets.

Now, radical LGBT activists have turned to their local city councils to challenge Chick-fil-A.

And, in one instance, the San Jose City Council just voted in favor of hanging rainbow flags next to the restaurant.

The Washington Examiner reports:

The San Jose City Council voted to hang rainbow flags next to a soon-to-be-opened Chick-fil-A, in a display of support for the city’s gay community.

The city council recently approved the new Chick-fil-A, which is set to open at San Jose International Airport in May. The fast food chain has faced boycotts from gay rights advocates because of its CEO’s support and funding for anti-gay marriage groups. Chick-fil-A has been blocked from opening up in airports in San Antonio and Buffalo, N.Y., in recent weeks.

The San Jose City Council voted unanimously to post the flags near the airport Chick-fil-A after the idea was suggested by Santa Clara County’s first openly gay elected official, Ken Yeager, according to NBC News.

The radical LGBT movement’s bizarre decision to target Chick-fil-A as one of their top public enemies has produced mixed results.

Hanging a rainbow flag by one of their restaurants is just one means of harassing and intimidating the business over the organization’s Christian beliefs.

But it’s far from the only way.

LGBT activists successfully lobbied the San Antonio City Council to disapprove a location being added to their airport.

A university in New Jersey refused to open a location citing their alleged record of “hatred” for the LGBT community.

Chick-fil-A has responded that it does not have a political agenda and only wishes to serve good food with great hospitality.

No one is forcing anyone in the LGBT community to eat at the restaurant.

But they are doing everything they can to try and put the fast food chain out of business.

What are your thoughts?

Is the radical Left’s targeting of Chick-fil-A effective? Or does all this talk of Chick-fil-A in the media just make everyone hungry?

Let us know in the comments below!

Mike Pence’s Christian faith is under assault from the last place you’d ever expect


Vice President Mike Pence has never been afraid to stand up for his Christian values – even when he is viscously attacked for them.

Now he’s under fire again.

And you won’t believe who is attacking the Vice President’s faith this time.

The Vice President has become a popular target of the secular left and radical “progressive” base of the Democrat Party.

Pence is regularly ridiculed by LGBT activists for disagreeing with their twisted agenda.

Now, students at a Christian university in Indiana are turning their backs on him, claiming the administration’s policies are not consistent with Christianity.

Fox News reports:

Vice President Mike Pence is getting pushback from Taylor University students and alumni after the small evangelical Christian school tapped the former Indiana governor to be this year’s commencement speaker.

Over 3,300 people have signed a change.org petition to get Pence’s invitation to the mid-May commencement ceremony rescinded, claiming the “Trump-Pence Administration’s policies” are “not consistent with the Christian ethic of love we hold dear.”

One Taylor grad said the school, “should be ashamed…I am physically shaking…I feel personally attacked,” but not all alumni agree and Taylor officials said they are standing by their decision.

Kevin Holtsberry, a Taylor alumni, told “Fox & Friends” Monday morning the outraged alumni and students are mistaking disagreement on political issues with personal attacks, while also thanking the school for “standing firm” and not pulling Pence’s invitation.

The left is doing everything they can to embarrass Vice President Pence before his speech at Taylor University.

In 2017, liberals organized a shameful walkout when Pence gave a commencement speech at Notre Dame.

Now, they are trying to pull off the same stunt again.

Famed evangelist Franklin Graham admonished the outraged students and alumni through Facebook using the Apostle Paul’s words, “You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you?” (Galatians 3:1)

Graham noted that so far the University’s President has stood firm and the speech is still scheduled as planned.

Should Mike Pence still deliver the commencement speech?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

This Hollywood actor just called Candace Owens something so despicable it will make your jaw drop


Candace Owens is a popular up-and-coming conservative commentator.

She’s also black and the Left despises her for it.

And one Hollywood actor just called her something so vile it will make you sick.

Candace Owens has made many enemies by criticizing Democrats and the Black Lives Matter movement.

She’s called out Democrats for taking advantage of African-Americans to get their votes in elections.

Naturally, she’s causing liberals to have meltdowns on social media.

Recently, Owens tweeted that it’s difficult to be a conservative in today’s culture.

That’s when Hollywood actor and writer, Geoffrey Thorne, called her the “N” word via Twitter.

Breitbart reports:

Actor Geoffrey Thorne told Turning Point USA’s communications director Candace Owens that conservatives will “never accept” her, adding “they will never think [of] you as anything but an obedient n***er.”

“Without question, it is more difficult today to come out as a conservative than it is to come out as gay. Conservatives today are treated with the same social stigma as gays were in the 80’s,” said Owens in her initial tweet, “Sunday on the #CandaceOwensShow, @robsmithonline and I discuss!!”

“they will never accept you. they will never think off [sic] you as anything but an obedient [n***er],” said the actor in response to Owens, “you will never be one of them. they see you as a trained animal that does the right tricks. one can only pray you never realize because, if you do, what’s left of your soul will crack.”

Candace Owens regularly receives hateful tweets calling her nasty names.

But this may be the vilest tweet she has received from a celebrity yet.

Twitter has recently been shutting down conservative accounts for “dangerous” speech.

But so far they have done nothing to Thorne’s account after calling Owens by this racial slur.

Ironically, Thorne’s tweet proves the point that she makes about the way liberals treat African-Americans.

If a black man or woman expresses any political differences from the Democrat Party line, they are subjected to verbal abuse and harassment.

The Left is not concerned about the welfare of African-Americans.

They just want their votes.

You won’t believe what Alyssa Milano is doing to encourage young women to get an abortion


Alyssa Milano has taken it upon herself to be become Hollywood’s top abortion cheerleader.

But she officially crossed the line.

And you won’t believe what she’s doing now to desensitize and encourage young women to abort their babies.

Milano has become Hollywood’s lead abortion cheerleader by opposing the “Heartbeat Bill.”

The Heartbeat Bill bans abortion once a heartbeat is detectable in the womb.

The state of Georgia recently passed this bill and liberals are furious.

Now, Alyssa Milano and other liberal Hollywood celebrities are calling on everyone to boycott the state.

But her latest move to promote abortion crosses the line.

Alyssa Milano is starting a podcast for women to share their abortion stories so young women can feel comfortable about getting one.

Breitbart reports:

The far-left actress Alyssa Milano has launched a new podcast where women will have the chance to share their “personal abortion” stories with the world.

The podcast, named “Sorry Not Sorry,” points out the fact that one in four women in the U.S. will have had an abortion by the time they are 45.

“If you’d like to share your personal abortion story on my podcast to help shine a light on the importance of bodily autonomy, please record the story on your voice memo app and email it to below address,” Milano tweeted. “If you’d like to remain anonymous please say so in your email. #SorryNotSorry.”

Milano’s new project comes at a time when she and other Hollywood figures are railing against Georgia’s new “heartbeat bill,” which seeks to outlaw abortions in the state as soon as a fetal heartbeat can be detected.

Alyssa Milano has gone too far.

Publicly advocating for abortion is nothing new.

But creating a platform for women to encourage others to have an abortion is dangerous and irresponsible.

Alyssa Milano has likely not considered the consequences of what she is doing.

Young women will not seek help from their parents or women’s centers but instead turn to abortion clinics or those that will perform the operation illegally.

Milano wants to share the “brave” stories of women getting an abortion to inspire others.

What she’s covering up is the deep psychological toll that getting an abortion can have on a woman who later regrets it.