Hillsong megachurch is in hot water after its portrayal of the birth of Jesus

47

Popular megachurches keep pushing the boundaries during the holidays.

They invent new secular and “relevant” ways to get people in the church.

But Hillsong is now in hot water after its portrayal of the birth of Jesus.

Hillsong UK is one of many Hillsong campuses across the world.

This Christmas they are planning a live skit called “London Carols” to recreate the story of the birth of Jesus Christ.

However, in a promotional video, they depicted the three wise men greeting Jesus at an inn where there is a lot of drinking and dancing.

Christian News Network writes:

Hillsong branch in the United Kingdom has removed from YouTube a promotional video for its annual Christmas musical that depicted the wise men arriving at a Bethlehem inn to see the baby Jesus, and upon entering, finding an environment with much drinking and dancing just feet from the Christ child.

The “three kings” video promoted Hillsong’s “London Carols” program, scheduled for Dec. 16. According to a description of the production, the “extravaganza follows the timeless story of the three wise men as they travel through different continents and eras, from the plains of Africa, through to the golden age of rock and roll and a space-aged future on their quest to deliver gifts to the newborn King.”

The YouTube advertisement featured the three wise men arriving at the inn, singing the carol “We Three Kings of Orient Are” to announce their purpose to an eccentric woman who answers the door. As they are pulled inside, they find Mary, Joseph and baby Jesus—as well as much dancing and merrymaking, complete with patrons at the bar holding large mugs of beer and servers on top of tables.

The video has now been removed without explanation. The London Carols event is still on, with one of the shows being sold out.

Hillsong was forced to take down the promotional video due to backlash.

This isn’t Hillsong’s first rodeo with controversy of this type.

In 2014 during Hillsong UK’s “Christmas Carols” event, they had women dressed up as flappers from the 1920s dance to “Silent Night.”

In the same way, Hillsong removed the performance from YouTube, but you can watch a re-upload below.

And in 2016 Hillsong New York’s youth pastor dressed up as the infamous “naked cowboy” from NYC for their “Colour Conference.”

He displayed himself wearing only underwear, a guitar and the American flag.

Instead of making the holiday season about the birth of our Savior, Hillsong just wants to use it to make a quick buck and grow their church by appealing to Social Justice Warrior secularists.

And when they are called out on it, they deny anything happened at all.

Do you think Hillsong is going too far to appease their audience? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

You won’t believe what the left just called racist

26

The left regularly labels iconic staples of Americana racist.

In the past they’ve attacked peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, hoop earrings and even casting a black lead in Star Trek.

But you won’t believe what classic childhood cartoon the left just called racist.

A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving is one of the iconic TV specials of American tradition and culture.

It teaches to love and accept people for whom they are and to be thankful for the friends and family in one’s life.

But the left called it racist because of a single scene.

Franklin, the show’s black character, is shown sitting my himself on one side of the Thanksgiving table.

The other characters are seated on one side of the table while he is seated across from them.

Charles Schultz, the creator of the Peanuts comic strip, was avidly anti-racism.

In fact, he drew attention to it in his comic strip.

And he specifically added Franklin into his iconic series because he wanted to improve race relations in the United States.

The idea for Franklin was inspired from a letter from a black schoolteacher in Los Angeles.

The teacher had phoned multiple cartoonists and they were all scared to add a black character due to the potential repercussions that might have ensued.

But Charles Schultz decided to add a black character anyway, and it worked.

WATCH: Tim Allen just revealed a secret about the plot for his Christmas movie

4

Hollywood hates Tim Allen because he portrays a conservative character on “Last Man Standing.”

He is also famous for his iconic role as Santa Claus in the movie The Santa Clause.

But what Tim Allen just revealed about The Santa Clause’s original plot will make you fall out of our chair.

Tim Allen revealed on The Tonight Show that he was originally supposed to shoot Santa Claus off his roof thinking he was a home invader.

The “Last Man Standing” star revealed that this original dark turn was how he was originally supposed to become Santa on Christmas.

In the same interview, Tim Allen revealed details about Toy Story 4 and dropped hints about the new script.

He also touched on the joy of watching The Santa Clause with his daughter while trying to keep her belief in Santa Claus alive.

“Last Man Standing” is a thorn in the liberal TV network world’s side.

It gets consistently high ratings because it portrays everyday American values.

One university refused to bring Chick-fil-a on campus for this crazy reason

52

University administrators are regularly pushing leftist propaganda.

They will do anything to prevent differing viewpoints off campus.

And one university flat-out refused to bring Chick-fil-a on campus for the most outrageous reason.

At Rider University in New Jersey, the school sent a survey to students to vote on what restaurants they would like to see on campus.

The students overwhelmingly voted for those tasty chicken sandwiches from Chick-fil-a.

However, the school administration rejected the student body’s vote, saying Chick-fil-a’s “corporate values” are problematic.

Campus Reform writes:

Rider University in New Jersey sent a survey to students during the spring semester, asking them which restaurants they would like to see the school bring on campus. But when it became clear that Chick-Fil-A was the students’ top choice, the college disregarded the results of the survey.

The school will not bring the popular fast food chain to campus because “their corporate values have not sufficiently progressed enough to align with those of Rider,” according to a Nov. 1 email sent to Rider students and obtained by Campus Reform. The school went on to clarify that the decision was in an effort to “promote…inclusion for all people.”

“It is important to me and to the University that all voices are heard,” Rider Assistant Vice President of Student Affairs Jan Friedman-Krupnick said to Campus Reform. “There are a number of factors that contribute to a campus’ decision to invite a retail partner on campus. While Chick-fil-A is among other restaurants preferenced by Rider students, there are members of the community (faculty, staff, and students) who strongly opposed the option as well.”

“In all of our campus decisions, we carefully weigh benefits, risks and voices representative of all of our campus constituents,” Friedman-Krupnick added.

Despite there being overwhelming support for Chick-fil-a from the student body, their wishes were denied because of the politicization of simple, tasty chicken sandwiches.

As one student pointed out, someone can disagree with Chick-fil-a’s Christian values and still eat their food.

Or, if someone doesn’t want to, they don’t have to.

The administration says that they insisted that Chick-fil-a doesn’t come on campus because there are those who “strongly oppose the option.”

Someone could just as “strongly oppose” Starbucks’ openly liberal political leanings.

But that doesn’t stop Rider University from keeping them on campus.

This is just a prime example of how radical leftist school administrators have become.

Do you think Chick-fil-a should be welcomed on the campus? Let us know in the comments below.

Wait until you see what this Muslim Congresswoman did in 2017

100

Congresswoman-elect Ilhan Omar (D-MN) will be the first Muslim to assume office in Washington, D.C.

She has been under attack for her radical Islamic views.

And what she did in 2017 was sickening.

Congresswoman-elect Ilhan Omar, argued against a 2017 bill in her state that increased penalty for female genital mutilation.

She accused the bill sponsors of wanting “to get in the media” and wanting a “flashy headline.”

Breitbart reports:

In 2017, she (Ilhan Omar) questioned a bill in the Minnesota State House against the practice, making it “a felony for parents to subject their daughters to the procedure and calls for loss of custody and prison terms from five to 20 years, depending on the extent of the injuries,” as well as “increas[ing] penalties for those who perform the procedure,” the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported.

While she agreed that the practice was “heinous,” and ultimately voted for the bill — contrary to at least one report — Omar claimed that FGM should not be singled out by a new law, and that parents should be charged under existing laws. She was quoted in local news as arguing: “I don’t want us to create laws because we want to get into the media and because we want a flashy headline.” She also reportedly opposed removing victims from their parents’ custody, according to Alpha News.

Omar would eventually vote in favor of the bill, which passed 124-4 in the Minnesota House before being struck down in the State Senate.

So Omar clearly had the advantage of reluctantly voting in favor of the bill that had overwhelming support to make herself look good.

While the Democrats are heralding her as a model so-called “progressive,” she is anything but.

She still defends her radical Islamic views today.

Her criticism of Israel is typical for subscribers to the Islamic religion.

And it begs the question what other radical views she will poison Congress with.

WATCH: Duck Dynasty star Willie Robinson just revealed what makes America great

0

The hit A&E TV show Duck Dynasty was a thorn in leftists’ sides.

They couldn’t stand that a show featuring a family of conservative hunters and entrepreneurs would resonate with the American people.

And now Duck Dynasty star Willie Robinson just revealed what makes America great in his new book.

Willie Robinson recently went on Fox Business network to discuss his new book “American Entrepreneur: How 400 Years of Risk-Takers, Innovators, and Business Visionaries Built the U.S.A.”

In the interview he discussed his childhood days and how he first developed his business savvy.

Fox Business reports:

Robertson, himself, has quite the story to tell. His journey began years ago with a worm farm.

“Have you ever farmed worms?” Robertson asked FOX Business’ Stuart Varney Opens a New Window. on Monday. “That was real labor intensive and the checkout was really long but I started that and my inventory kept getting stolen by my brother.”

But he also learned a lot about entrepreneurship Opens a New Window. watching his father start the duck calling business, Duck Commander, which he now heads as the chief executive officer.

“Watching my father start this duck calling business,” he said. “I was watching how that went, which was really slow at the time and he was also a fisherman as well.”

Willie Robertson is the CEO of the family owned Duck Commander store in Louisiana.

It sells Duck Calls by the same name.

His book, “American Entrepreneur,” was just released on November 20.

According to the description, “American Entrepreneur tells a most American tale, of those among us who through their vision, ingenuity, and good old-fashioned hard work, made something that changed the world.”

You won’t believe how Good Morning America just used this 11-year-old kid

46

Radical LGBT activists will use anything or anyone to push their agenda.

They don’t care about the side effects of their morally void lifestyle.

And the way Good Morning America just used this 11-year-old kid is sickening.

On Good Morning America, an 11-year-old kid was paraded around on the show claiming he is a “drag queen” and “gay.”

The hosts completely accepted his “identity” and even described it as “trailblazing.”

Life Site News writes:

The sexualization and “gender fluidity” of children got one of its most mainstream boosts yet this month, as “Good Morning America” (GMA) devoted a segment to prepubescent “drag artist” Desmond Napoles.

Napoles, known onstage as “Desmond is Amazing,” is a self-described “androgynous drag kid” who identifies as gay (though it’s unclear if he understands the term’s implications). He reportedly started displaying an interest in women’s clothes at age six, after which his parents say a therapist advised them to allow him to “explore.” He rose to prominence in 2014 when RuPaul and Jinkx Monsoon featured him in a music video.

Earlier this month, “GMA Day” co-hosts Michael Strahan and Sara Haines invited Napoles on the show for a celebration of his “trail-blazing” and “bravery” in the world of drag.

After Napoles came onstage by strutting across a red carpet, a conversation ensued celebrating the “inspiring” impact of his cross-dressing as an example for individuality, and his parents’ support for his self-expression. The young boy’s flamboyant and decidedly-adult garb contrasted sharply with his talk of enjoying trains and root beer.

The segment also treated Napoles to a surprise visit by “iconic drag queens” Hedda Lettuce, Shannel, and Alyssa Edwards. The performers lavished similar praise on the boy’s activities as “courageous,” “inspirational,” and “the future of drag.” They also presented him with a number of gifts, including a gift basket of makeup, a unicorn bag with fake nails and other assorted items, and more.

This is a prime example of how the LGBT will even propagandize children.

Sadly this is nothing new, however.

The so-called “progressives” have been targeting children because they know they don’t know better.

As Culture Watch News reported, Planned Parenthood showed high schoolers a video in their sex ed course of same-sex couples making out.

They want to brainwash and hypersexualize the future of America from a young age for their own political benefit.

And their end goal is to see their deviant and morally void vision for America come to fruition.

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

This photo of a baby just turned Planned Parenthood’s campaign on its head

45

It’s no secret Planned Parenthood wants abortion-on-demand.

They want young women to think taking an abortion pill is no different than an aspirin.

But this photo of a baby who survived an attempted abortion just turned Planned Parenthood’s campaign on its head.

Dr. Brent Boles took a photo with a beautiful baby boy.

The photo was “to celebrate human life,” Pregnancy Help News reports.

It was a celebration of the effectiveness of abortion pill reversal and the sanctity of human life.

The photo went viral, with thousands of reactions and shares in addition to hundreds of comments.

But Planned Parenthood doesn’t like such photos going viral because it shows that abortion decisions can be reversed.

They want abortions to be final to continue their bloody business and have repeat customers.

The abortion pill is the latest creation endorsed by Planned Parenthood to make abortion more normalized.

But what Planned Parenthood doesn’t tell customers is that there is a reversal procedure in case customers change their mind and want to save the innocent baby growing inside them.

Abortion pill reversal has saved over 500 babies since October 2018, with more being added to that number as word continues to get out about the life-saving method.

Let us know your thoughts about the viral photo in the comments below.

What this university is forcing Christians to do will make you furious

51

Universities have become increasingly hostile to Christians.

They want Christians to support their radical agenda or shut up.

And what one university is forcing Christians to do will have you seeing red.

The University of Colorado is being sued after forcing a Christian group, Ratio Christi, to allow radical atheists and other “non-Christians” to lead their Bible studies.

Christian Headlines writes:

The University of Colorado at Colorado Springs is being sued after demanding that a Christian organization permit “atheists or other non-Christians to lead their Bible studies” in order to be recognized on campus.

While the school officials declined to comment on the situation, the Alliance Defending Freedom stated that: “The university refused to grant Ratio Christi registered status because it only allows those who share and personally hold beliefs consistent with the group’s mission to serve as its leaders.”

“As a Christian apologetics organization, Ratio Christi seeks to defend the Christian faith and explain how the Bible applies to various current cultural, ethical, and political issues. Any student can attend its events. Any student of any faith can become a member of Ratio Christi, as long as he supports the group’s purpose. But Ratio Christi requires that those who lead the Christian organization must share its religious beliefs. As a result, the university has denied it registered status, limiting its access to funding, meeting and event space, and administrative support,” said the legal team.

The lawsuit disputes the school’s belief that it can refuse registered status to groups if they choose leaders that agree with the group’s religious outlooks.

Additionally, it notes other biased actions by the school against the Christian group, including that “non-religious groups are allowed to select members who support their purposes. And the university allows fraternities that admit only men and sororities that admit only women to continue as registered student organizations, in contradiction to the university’s policy against ‘discriminating based on sex.’”

This is a direct assault on the Christian students’ First Amendment rights.

As the lawsuit points out, any particular group is allowed to select leaders that agree with the group’s beliefs at large.

Any math, history, or politics group would be allowed to select their leaders based on their merit.

But to deny Christians the same right is to persecute them because they are Christian.

Unfortunately, this is an epidemic on campuses across the country.

As Culture Watch News reported, a student senator at UC Berkeley was harassed for simply sharing her Christian beliefs.

Christians all across the country are under attack because of their faith.

And radical leftists won’t stop until Christians are eradicated from Academia entirely.

Do you think the Christians should be allowed to pick their group leaders? Let us know in the comments below.

Tim Allen just dropped a major truth bomb in an interview that Hollywood will hate

59

Tim Allen’s show “Last Man Standing” is a hit.

His liberal critics hate that he is successful portraying a conservative character on network television.

But Allen just dropped a major truth bomb in this interview that embarrassed his critics.

Tim Allen recently gave an interview to IndieWire where he discussed a variety of topics from his show to modern politics.

He was asked about how people often confuse the things his character Mike Baxter believes with his own personal beliefs.

And he responded with a truth bomb saying “Liberals have a very small window of sense of humor.”

Fox News writes:

“I said there’s nothing, especially in this area, that pisses people off more than a very funny conservative. A smart, funny conservative that takes shots and is certainly self-effacing. The left-wing point of view is so pervasive that they don’t even realize it’s a point of view. It is just a point of view,” Allen said in an interview with IndieWire. “I think this character likes that, he likes to have another point of view. It makes him sharper and more interesting. But we don’t push it. I don’t think we’ve mentioned pro or con Trump once now.”

Still, despite his propensity for wanting to disrupt the general consensus of what’s funny and politically correct, Allen admits that it’s difficult when fans equate his personal beliefs to that of the character he plays.

“I did an interview and I said, ‘Are you asking Mike Baxter this question, because you heard something about the Clintons that the writers had written?’ Now, I’ll put something behind it, because I think it’s funny to make fun of people that are full of themselves. Liberals have a very small window of sense of humor about themselves, so I love poking at it. Two years ago, it was the conservatives, or whatever it is. But right now liberals, particularly progressives, hide behind large concepts. If you don’t agree with them, if you don’t agree with that position, then you hate women, and you hate gay people, and you hate pro-choice people, whatever. And I said that doesn’t fit.”

Allen absolutely hit the nail on the head.

When ABC cancelled the show, everyone was suspicious of their motive.

Critics argued that it was because Tim Allen’s character is an outspoken conservative.

But now that FOX is enjoying its renewed success, it proves what conservatives were saying from the beginning.

Hollywood elitists want to keep all the screen space for themselves, and silence anyone remotely conservative from the platform.

They look down on conservatives and don’t want to cater to an audience of patriotic Americans.

Liberals just can’t stand the fact that his show is a success, garnering tens of millions of views, making it the most-watched Friday telecast on Fox in 18 years.

Do you think ABC regrets cancelling “Last Man Standing” in the first place? Let us know in the comments below.