Academia is just a surrogate for Radical Leftists.
And like the Radical Left, they often promote anti-American policies and ideas.
But they crossed the line with this attack on American society.
The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign’s (UIUC) Gender & Women’s Studies department just demanded the abolition of the police, ICE, and the judicial system in a new nine-point platform.
They also called for the eradication of the supposed “cisgender heterosexual patriarchy” and alleged “global white supremacy.”
Campus Reform reports:
Madeleine Hubbard, president of Turning Point USA at UIUC, called this demand “very concerning.”
“Without these groups, you would not have Rule of Law. A society cannot function without the Rule of Law. Complete chaos and anarchy would break out,” Hubbard told Campus Reform. “It is disturbing that a university department would call for the end of the judicial system. While there might be flaws in the judicial system, it is still the very fabric that holds society together.”
The UI department subsequently deleted the Facebook post and did not return requests for comment. But other controversial posts still remain on the department’s Facebook page. UIUC’s Gender & Women Studies department also encouraged students to leave a “feminist curse” and to “take or leave a feminist offering” via Facebook.
“We invite you to leave a feminist curse on the wall or in the skull and pick up a feminist benediction (a button, a flyer, whatever offerings are her,” a sign posted in late September reads. “At the end of the month, we will burn all our curses together.”
This latest stunt is crossing the line.
As Madeleine Hubbard from Turning Point USA pointed out, they are launching an attack on the very fabric of our democracy.
Unfortunately, this is nothing new for Academia.
As we reported, San Diego State University offered a class focusing on the impeachment of Trump.
Now, the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign showed the true colors of Academia.
They fundamentally hate America and our freedoms because of their so-called “progressive” fantasies.
Do you think Academia has gone too far? Let us know what you think in the comments below.
The Church of England has adopted politically “progressive” policies over the past few years.
They think they are adapting to stay “relevant” with society as a result.
But what the Church of England is encouraging transgenders to do will make you furious.
The Church of England has moved full force to adopt pro-transgenderism policies as of late.
But recently they told their transgender members they should perform an “Affirmation of Baptism” service to signify their new gender identity.
The Church of England says that the move is to help “welcome and encourage the affirmation of trans people.”
The Church of England has issued new advice about how to help transgender people mark their transition.
The guidance recommends the Affirmation of Baptism service is adapted to allow transgender Christians to celebrate their new sexual identity.
The service would see them addressed by their chosen name, not birth name.
It follows pressure at the general synod last year to go further in welcoming the transgender community.
The Affirmation of Baptism service is not a second baptism and is traditionally intended for people who wish to make a renewed declaration of their faith.
The guidance emphasises that the Church “welcomes and encourages the unconditional affirmation of trans people, equally with all people, within the body of Christ, and rejoices in the diversity of that body into which all Christians have been baptized by one Spirit”.
As BBC notes, the move comes after just last year the Church had voted to be more “welcoming” and “affirming” of transgenders.
They even said they would be “looking into having transgender services.”
The Church of England is crossing a line.
They have rejected the truth of the Bible that teaches us that God made man and woman the way they are.
And there is no changing that, no matter how someone “feels.”
To truly love others, you have to be willing to tell them the truth.
That is the way Christ loved the woman at the well, and how the Bible teaches Christians to love.
But unfortunately, too many churches think keeping the peace is the way to love others.
Do you agree with the Church’s new “transgender Affirmation of Baptism” policy? Let us know in the comments section.
A Transgender “safe space” was set up in this U.S. city and you’ll never guess who’s footing the bill
So-called “transgender” people are forcing their lifestyle on America.
They’ve even gone as far as to insist on military enrollment, which could’ve led to taxpayer-funded sex changes.
But transgenders in one major city just scored a huge victory and you’ll never guess who was left holding the bag.
The San Francisco, California Board of Supervisors unanimously supported $215,000 in taxpayer funding to establish a “transgender cultural district” in the city.
This amounts to a taxpayer-funded giant “safe space” for transgenders.
Named after the infamous Compton riots, where so-called “transgender” people attacked law enforcement officers over alleged police brutality, the district is called “Compton’s Transgender Cultural District.”
The district has gay bars, transgender dance clubs and “hook-up” spots.
The Daily Beast reports:
The area Mahogany was walking through makes up part of the first legally recognized transgender district in the world, Compton’s Transgender Cultural District.
Mahogany, a performer and contestant on Season 5 of RuPaul’s Drag Race, is Compton’s district manager. The district’s purpose is to stop the displacement of trans people from a place they have been welcomed in historically, and to teach people about trans history, she said.
In May of this year, the 11 members of the Board of Supervisors unanimously supported funding the city’s cultural districts, which include the “Calle 24: Latino Cultural District and the LGBTQ Leather Cultural District in SOMA.
Compton’s received $215,000 from the city, said Clair Farley, director of San Francisco’s Office of Transgender Initiatives. Last year the focus was on getting community input and establishing priorities for the district. Going forward, Farley says, the goal is to help trans business and to provide workforce development for trans and LGBTQ people.
San Francisco is so obsessed with pushing “transgender culture” they’ve given up on taking care of their city.
San Francisco has major drug and homeless problems. Human feces has piled up on the streets.
It’s gotten so bad, San Francisco Mayor London Breed was asked about it in her very first sit-down interview.
She admitted, “I will say there is more feces on the sidewalks than I’ve ever seen growing up here.”
In 2018, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that the city’s 311 service portal received over a thousand complaints of discarded syringes within a 25 day period.
Additionally, over 13,000 dirty needles were found scattered about in just two metro stops.
But instead of taxpayer dollars being put toward a cleaner city, it’s used for social justice propaganda.
Should taxpayers be forced to pay for transgender safe spaces? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Nothing scares liberal activists more than the nativity story.
To them, the story of a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes lying in a manger being visited by wise men is a bloody sore on the history of mankind.
And what liberal activists did to this town’s 70 year Christmas tradition will make you see red.
A public school district in Michigan was issued a warning by civil rights activists to remove their 70-year-old Wise Men display or face a lawsuit.
The beloved display of the three Wise Men sits on top of Newaygo Elementary School.
The Michigan Association of Civil Rights Activists (MACRA) put the Newaygo Public School District on notice because they allegedly received a complaint that the display was offensive.
But most citizens of the small Michigan town want the display to stay up as part of a decades-old tradition.
9 and 10 news reports:
A popular, long standing Christmas decoration is in risk of getting taken down after a civil rights group opposes it standing on top of a public elementary school.
“It’s just a symbol of our community it’s always been there and we love it,” says Amy Postma.
For decades the Three Wisemen have watched over Newaygo from high on top of the elementary school. Three wisemen heading towards the star of Bethlehem. A tradition for Newaygo, but possibly an illegal tradition, a failure to separate church and state.
People around town have been talking about the controversy over the weekend and very few want to have the decorations taken down.
“It would be just as ridiculous to say you can’t have Santa Claus in the bank taking pictures with kids,” says Postma, a lifelong Newaygo resident, “It’s a part of the festivities.”
Leftwing secularists have pushed the War on Christmas to new heights this year.
As we recently reported, a town in Ohio was forced to take down their nativity scene after receiving threats from the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
And another school in Nebraska banned Christmas colors, Christmas carols and candy canes.
Do you think that Christmas is offensive? Let us know in the comments!
Many pro-lifers stuck their necks out to defend Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation fight.
And radical pro-abortion activists were literally clawing on the doors of the Supreme Court to stop him from being sworn in.
But Justice Kavanaugh just made a decision that had Planned Parenthood jumping for joy.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the Supreme Court’s liberal justices to decline to hear a case that would allow states to defund Planned Parenthood.
This lawsuit marks the third time the Supreme Court refused to hear such a case.
Tim Jost, an emeritus professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, said it’s “noteworthy” that Kavanaugh passed on the cases.
“If Kavanaugh was going to deal a major blow to health care rights during his first session on the court, this would have been the case to do it,” Jost said.
The anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List said it was “disappointed” the Supreme Court declined the case, as it called on the Trump administration to quickly finalize rules blocking federal funds to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers through the Title X family planning program.
“The pro-life citizens of states like Kansas and Louisiana, through their elected representatives, have clearly expressed their will: they do not want Medicaid tax dollars used to prop up abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood,” said SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser in a statement.
Many pro-lifers thought Justice Kavanaugh would be an immediate ally in the fight to end abortion.
But he has so far refused to lift a finger.
Meanwhile, conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch all voted to hear the case.
In order for a case to be heard before the Supreme Court, four justices must agree to hear it.
Justice Kavanaugh’s vote in favor would have been the one that tipped the scales.
This isn’t the first time conservatives were blindsided by Supreme Court Justices appointed by Republican presidents.
Chief Justice John Roberts, a George W. Bush appointee, sided with liberal Supreme Court Justices in 2012 to uphold Obamacare.
And Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, sided with liberal Justices to force all states to accept gay marriage as a “right” guaranteed by the Constitution.
Is Justice Kavanaugh’s decision another example of a Republican SCOTUS pick stabbing pro-lifers in the back?
Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.
Radical leftists will threaten anyone who dares disagree with them.
They will even threaten their own leftist friends who aren’t “progressive” enough.
And this professor was threatened with rape after she opposed this transgender bill.
At Reading University in the U.K., professor Rosa Freedman opposed a transgender reform act that would allow people to change their legal gender at a whim.
And as a result, Freedman says her door was covered in urine and was told she “should be raped.”
Christian Headlines writes:
A United Kingdom professor says her office door was “covered in urine” after she criticized a proposal that would make it easier for people to change their gender.
Rosa Freedman, a professor of law at Reading University, said she received threats and verbal abuse on social media and over the phone.
The government is considering changes to the Gender Recognition Act that would allow people to change their legal gender by mere self-identification. The current law allows a person to change his/her gender, although it’s more cumbersome.
Freedman opposes the changes and says they would harm women’s rights.
“I am deeply concerned by how the conflation of sex and gender is leading to subjugation of women and is undermining the specific protections guaranteed to women under international and national human rights law,” she has said.
She was called a “Nazi” and told she “should be raped,” the BBC reported.
“I’m pretty public and open about the fact that I’m Jewish,” Freedman said. “I’m pretty public and open about the fact I’ve survived sexual violence – I have been throughout these debates.
The professor is by no means a conservative. She even claims to be pro-LGBT.
There is no appeasing the Social Justice Warriors.
If you express anything other than 100% compliance with their radical agenda, you will be publicly shamed.
Sadly, this is nothing new on college campuses.
As we reported, a teacher in Virginia was fired for “misgendering” a so-called “transgender” student during class.
The SJWs want to completely eradicate anyone who opposes their radical agenda from education so they can brainwash the upcoming generations for decades to come.
And this is exactly why the defense of free speech is crucial.
Do you think Social Justice Warriors are getting out of hand? Let us know what you think in the comments below.
One of liberal academia’s favorite pastimes is coming up with new lies about Christianity.
They indoctrinate America’s youth with this propaganda.
But one professor said something about God that would make Satan proud.
Dr. Eric Sprankle, a Minnesota State University-Mankato psychology professor just compared God to a sexual predator on Twitter.
He says God impregnated the Virgin Mary without her consent.
He followed that with a sarcastic “Happy Holidays” quip:
The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario. Happy Holidays.
— Eric Sprankle, PsyD (@DrSprankle) December 3, 2018
But someone explicitly showed where God asked Mary for consent in Luke 1:38.
Dr. Sprankle instead doubled down on his sickening rhetoric to say that God was behaving in a “predatory” manner, comparing it to the #MeToo movement.
The biblical god regularly punished disobedience. The power difference (deity vs mortal) and the potential for violence for saying “no” negates her “yes.” To put someone in this position is an unethical abuse of power at best and grossly predatory at worst.
— Eric Sprankle, PsyD (@DrSprankle) December 4, 2018
On Tucker Carlson’s show, Mark Steyn exposed him for the world to see.
Steyn, a Canadian political and cultural commentator, called the professor “banal and shallow.”
Basically, the idea that God has gotten the Virgin Mary back to his pad and she’s saying “I really must go” and He’s saying “baby it’s cold outside!” and puts some records on while [He] paw(s).
I miss the days when atheists were at least intelligent enough to take seriously what they were porting to knock down.
The stupidity and banality and shallowness and reductiveness of this is a dismal comment on the state of atheism in America.
Do you think the professor should be fired for comparing God to a sexual predator? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below
Watch the interview below: