Michael Bloomberg wants to take away your guns.
He’s poured millions and millions into anti-gun initiatives nationwide.
But one church shooting hero just put Bloomberg to shame with this simple message.
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he’s willing to spend $1 billion on his vain bid for president.
Based on his ceaseless ad campaign, Bloomberg is well on his way to spending nine figures.
And one of Bloomberg’s top priorities is gutting the Second Amendment.
Bloomberg is the ultimate nanny state politician, and he doesn’t believe you have the right to own a gun.
Recently, an evil shooter with a sawed-off shotgun killed two parishioners during a church service in Texas. But he was stopped just six seconds after he began shooting by volunteer security guard Jack Wilson who was carrying a firearm.
Wilson heroically took down the shooter before he could kill anyone else.
In light of that heroic act, Bloomberg replied, “[I]t’s the job of law enforcement to have guns and decide when to shoot. We just do not want the average citizen carrying a gun in a crowded place.”
Bloomberg should ask the people in that church what they think of a “good guy with a gun.”
Wilson had the perfect response to Bloomberg’s absurd gun control views:
“Mr. Bloomberg, had we operated by his standards or his wishes, the carnage would have been significantly greater because the individual still had, after the shooting, still had seven live rounds in his gun and three more in his pocket.”
There’s no telling how many more would’ve died without Wilson’s heroics.
Wilson continued, “Even though the police department did arrive in roughly two minutes from the time the first call went in, by that time, you know, the carnage would have been much, much worse.”
The shooter killed two people in a matter of seconds.
Two minutes is an eternity when there’s an active shooter on the loose.
Wilson concluded, “If Mr. Bloomberg would have his security detail turn their arms in and not guard him, he would be in the same situation as many American citizens are every day.”
So Bloomberg wants private citizens defending him, but he doesn’t want private citizens to have the opportunity to defend themselves.
Bloomberg’s views on gun rights are completely un-American, and should concern everyone when they’re casting their vote.
What would Bloomberg think about his security detail being disarmed?
Let us know in the comments below.