Chris Cuomo could be kicked off CNN after making one joke

31

Chris Cuomo landed himself in hot water.

The CNN anchor has had many gaffes over the years.

But this latest one could cost him dearly.

If there was any doubt the Left has gone insane, all of that doubt was removed after the LGBT Townhall on CNN.

The radical Left has veered wildly away from middle America and it was on display for everyone to see.

When 2020 Democrat candidate Senator Kamala Harris (CA) came onto the stage, she engaged in the latest far-Left trend of sounding off with your preferred pronouns.

Harris’ clear pandering got applause from the far-Left crowd, but then things got bizarre and awkward.

CNN host and moderator Chris Cuomo thought it would be a good time to tell a joke.

Cuomo responded that he, too, identifies using female pronouns.

Life Site News reports:

The next segment was devoted to Sen. Kamala Harris of California, whose very first remarks after thanking host Chris Cuomo were, “my pronouns are she, her, and hers.” She touted her record of establishing a hate crimes unit as a San Francisco prosecutor, and promised to “end” HIV/AIDS “within a generation” as well as tackle LGBT homelessness

In the new world of “woketivism,” using proper pronouns is serious business.

Cuomo was immediately forced to apologize for his faux pas:

Cuomo’s apology saved his job, which could’ve been in jeopardy.

After years of activism, the LGBT lobby has become incredibly powerful and belligerent.

Former actor Mario Lopez came within an inch of losing his plum hosting gig on “Access Hollywood” for having the audacity to say that three-year-old children shouldn’t be put on irreversible hormone blockers because they’ve been convinced they may be the opposite gender.

Lopez quickly bent the knee and kept his job.

Cuomo had to do the same thing.

This is the state of the modern Left.

If you disagree with any of their “dogma” or simply make a mistake, you must pay swiftly.

Nobody likes a scold, especially not the American people.

CNN’s Townhall might’ve been the radical move that pushed people over the edge.

Do you think the radical Left has gone too far with LGBT hysteria?

Leave a comment below.

31 COMMENTS

  1. Loading...
  2. The apostle Paul wrote in I Corinthians Chapter 7:

    “It is good for a man not to touch a woman, but because of prevailing immoralities, let every man have his own wife and let every woman have her own husband.

    “The husband must render to his wife the obligations that are due her, and similarly the wife to her husband…

    “Do not deprive each other, except by mutual agreement for a time to devote yourselves unhindered by prayer; and come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you on account of your lack of self-control.”

    (The apostle Paul’s words here suggest regulated or restricted sexual activity, even within marriage! Augustine and Aquinas taught sex is intended only within marriage and only for procreation.)

    “I say this by way of concession, not as a regulation. I wish all were as I am (celibate), but each person has his own gift from God, the one in this direction, the other in that.

    “To the single and the widows, I say that it is good for them to remain as I am (celibate); but if they cannot restrain their passions, let them marry, for it is better to marry than to burn (with desire).

    “To the married couples I command — not really I but the Lord — that the wife must not leave her husband; and in case she does separate, she must either stay single or make up with her husband. And the husband must not divorce his wife.

    “…if the unbeliever wants to separate, let there be separation…”

    (Jesus forbade divorce, except in the case of unfaithfulness. And here we see Paul forbidding divorce, except in the case of an unbeliever demanding separation!)

    “Regarding the unmarried I have no divine injunction, but as one who has received mercy from the Lord to be trustworthy, I give my opinion… it is good for a person to remain in his present situation.

    “Are you united to a wife? do not seek release. Are you unattached to a woman? Do not seek a wife. But in case you marry, you do not sin; nor does the unmarried woman sin if she marries…

    “The single person is concerned with the Lord’s affairs, how to please the Lord, but the married person is concerned with things of the world, how to please his wife; he has divided interests.

    “The unmarried woman or the virgin is interested in the Lord’s affairs, that she may be dedicated to Him in body and spirit; but the married woman is concerned with things of the world, how she may please her husband.”

    “I mention this for your own good, not to throw a rope around you but to promote proper behavior and undisturbed devotion to the Lord.”

    I’ll take the conservative Christian opposition to LGBT rights seriously when they condemn birth control, divorce, and fornication just as strongly.

  3. The apostle Paul claims the risen Jesus told him three times, “…my grace is sufficient for thee…” and some “Christians” take these words not as grace to stop sinning but as a license to indulge in sin. And Paul warns that drunkards, thieves, idolaters, fornicators, homosexuals, etc. will not receive the kingdom of God and that some of his followers *were* these things, clearly indicating coming to Christ means giving these things up, giving up sinning altogether. (I Corinthians 6:9-11) The “Christians” I encounter revel in fornication and deride anyone not “getting it” as a real loser. If “three times” excuses fornication, it also excuses homosexuality, since Paul condemns both in the same verse. Are homosexuals “flaunting” their lifestyle as this article suggests, or merely asking that, like fornication, it merely be accepted as the norm?

  4. Those aren’t real Christians you’re talking about Vasu.
    It takes more than just calling yourself a Christian to be saved.

  5. A hundred years ago, all Christian churches opposed birth control. Fifty years ago, they were saying a divorced man would never be elected president, and saying that’s what impeded Nelson Rockefeller’s chances of being elected president. Forty years ago, unmarried couples living together was mildly scandalous, and reflected as such in sitcoms like Three’s Company and Mork & Mindy. Fifteen years ago, there weren’t even any Democratic politicians in favor of same-sex marriage.

    Christians in the West, thinking themselves smugly superior to the rest of the world, where there is no dating, no boyfriends or girlfriends, etc. are really taking credit for the past five hundred years of secular social progress, nearly all of which was resisted by previous generations of Christians:

    …democracy and representative government in place of monarchy and belief in the divine right of kings; the separation of church and state; the abolition of (human) slavery; the emancipation of women; birth control; the sexual revolution; LGBT rights, etc… so they’re not in a position to resist animal rights as social and moral progress for all mankind, nor think themselves smugly superior to the rest of the world.

    It would be like Christians decades from now, in the middle of the 21st century, thinking themselves smugly superior to the Muslim world since Christianity now allows same-sex marriage, with the Muslims resisting it, forgetting that Christians in the early 21st century were resisting same-sex marriage, too.

    As recently as 2007, the George W. Bush administration was still promoting abstinence-only sex education!

  6. I agree with you. And when I see people of other faiths sincerely trying to follow their religion, trying to live their lives according to religious principles, I respect it. My problem isn’t with “Christians” unable to follow Jesus or Paul, but rather with the hypocrisy of saying, “I believe” while conveniently ignoring the rest of what their religion dictates when it suits them.

    Jesus himself condemned this kind of lip service, saying, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ shall receive the kingdom, but only he who does the will of my Father.”

    George Harrison said: “Although Christ in my mind is an absolute yogi, I think many Christian teachers today are misrepresenting Christ. They’re supposed to be representing Jesus, but they’re not doing it very well. They’re letting him down very badly, and that’s a big turn off.”

    Through Jesus and Christianity, Westerners have *some* idea of spiritual life. When a bogus guru like Rajneesh was interviewed on television over thirty years ago, they were asking him why he owned dozens of Rolls Royces, etc.

    Similarly, my friend Greg in San Diego is the second youngest of seven children, and his parents, devout Catholics, abstained from sex outside of marriage. Greg’s older sister Claire became born again, and Greg says Claire hasn’t had sex since the ’70s, because she’s unmarried and takes seriously the biblical injunction against sex outside of marriage.

    If Claire were to sleep around and were to try and rationalize fornication with “three times…” everyone would see her as a fraud!

    Conservative Christians are wary of anyone preaching what they think is a “false gospel.” Otherwise, why aren’t they still following Jim and Tammy Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggard, etc.? They were all exposed as frauds and hypocrites.

    If Ted Haggard were to try and rationalize his homosexual affairs with “three times…” would the Christians take it seriously?

    Again: through Jesus and Christianity, Westerners have *some* idea of spiritual life. The Vedic literatures give a clearer and deeper understanding.

  7. You’ve lost your minds…..is there NOTHING you won’t say or do to make yourselves the stable geniuses and the Dems the insane ppl? Seriously – there’s no “God” in anything you say or do and your darkening is only a reflection of your souls. You WILL have to answer for this one day – and, I’d hate to be any one of you…

  8. I thought we had all gotten past all of the CRAP – there seems to hundreds of Gods & Goddesses – the only thing that makes sense is “do unto others – as you would have others do onto you – respect yourself & the people around you

  9. Vasu Murti isn’t that a Hindu name or somewhere from India? Why would you even quote Bible scriptures. Just go and make some blueberry squishies and leave as alone. Nobody wants to hear you. Go! Go! Quickly!

  10. Oh “Fredo” in trouble again. Got your foot in your mouth I see. The only problem does it taste like parmesan cheese.

  11. I don’t know what churches did 100 years ago, but I just know birth control is not mentioned in the bible, except for abstinence obviously.
    Anything you see today under the guise of Christianity is no such thing if it is not supported by scripture. That is the truth.

  12. Kayley; Quite right. Thank you ! And quite frankly, I don’t watch CNN because of their bias against Trump, so I don’t care who they get rid of.

  13. Is there any alternative to civil war at this point? No, there is not. If these leftist insects are not exterminated, this country is finished and we will all be speaking Chinese.

  14. YEA!!!!
    JUST LIKE FREDO CUOMO!!!!
    Too bad Fredo and his baby killer, Andrew’s law about killing babies
    outside the womb was NOT in effect when Mrs. Cuomo
    hatched those two idiots!
    She could have made them comfortable and than made
    a decision with the Physician to execute the babies!!!

  15. If civil war breaks out in the United States, as the States are in their present conditions, it will be accompanied by world war, perhaps simultaneous civil wars in every populous nation, such as nationalists versus globalists, whereby the nationalists of one nation do not even like the nationalists of any other nation.

    Regardless of the outcome, the world would be forever changed. The Great War and its sequel World War already had that effect. But the next time it will much more extreme, and the victors, be them Pyrrhic victors or otherwise, will severely punish the defeated parties, the punishments possibly working the corruption of blood for as long as possible.

    We might think of the dystopia scenario presented in “The Hunger Games”, “Divergent”, “The Maze Runner”, “Equal”, “The Giver” or “Equilibrium” as fantasy junk for young adults or as something far beyond the horizon of time, but it is actually very plausible, and the backstories of the stories may reflect the basis of the settings of “Nineteen Eighty Four”, “Fahrenheit 451” and “Brave New World”. In fact, it is consistent with how the Soviet Union was the way it was after its forces won a major war; a way which might not have been particularly new even back then, since similar regimes and policies had been enacted in one place or another, for the last forty centuries or so.

    Meanwhile, there is also the prospect of technology and knowledge rendering humanity more defenseless against complexity than confident in mitigating it.

  16. LGBT are legit now. They may do their thin g whatever their thing is. Why won’t they shut up and leave all of us alone.
    We are not going to TV or such and scream we like to have children – it will be nobody to sell hamburgers in 50 years!

  17. Their young bodies were warm and the bodily fluids intermingled together so half-breeds came forth upon us. What comes with the rain comes for us all.
    Peace be upon them. In Allah’s name we pray Amen.

  18. Their young bodies were warm and the bodily fluids intermingled together so half-breeds came forth upon us. What comes with the rain comes for us all.
    Peace be upon them. In Allah’s name we pray Amen.

  19. the ENGLISH IN ENGLAND ARE LAUGHING AT THE AMERICANS FOR ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, AND WHY WOULDN’T THEM !

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here