A pro-life activist recorded a liberal freak out on camera and that’s when all hell broke loose

66

Ever since Alabama passed their new abortion law, liberals are having a meltdown over their so-called “abortion rights.”

But these pro-abortion activists went too far.

A pro-life activist filmed a liberal activist freaking out, and that’s when things quickly went south.

When Georgia passed the heartbeat bill, nearly every hardcore leftist in Hollywood joined the boycott effort led by Alyssa Milano.

But that did not stop the pro-life movement.

The state of Alabama decided to pass a law that makes it illegal for a doctor to provide a woman with an abortion.

The law effectively makes abortion illegal in the state of Alabama.

That’s when all hell broke loose.

In this instance, a woman was peacefully protesting Planned Parenthood when an enraged liberal interrupted her by assaulting her on camera.

The Daily Wire reports:

A pro-life woman in Huntsville, Alabama, was physically assaulted by a feminist earlier this month as she was protesting abortion outside the Alabama Women’s Center abortion clinic.

The pro-life woman, identified as Mary Baggett, captured the assault on video and posted it to social media; her caption read: “This lady attacked me at the baby murdering mill! I believe the deathscorts were inciting her and her friend/boyfriend. I saw them being buddies with them earlier and hugging them. I’m ok but my hand is bruised and swelling up. My hands, feet and back are hurting. It could have been worse. Thank You Father for Your protection”

In the video, Baggett is on the sidewalk with other pro-lifers holding signs about abortion. Then a car pulls up and shouting begins. Soon enough, Baggett is being charged and physically assaulted by a female upset about their pro-life speech and is screaming that she did not give them “permission” to film her.

The pro-abortion industry is losing big time during President Trump’s administration.

Not only has Trump cut taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood, but states are finally standing up to Roe v. Wade.

Naturally, liberals are panicked about their ability to murder unborn children.

They are spending millions of dollars to defend abortion and fight back.

There is no doubt that Georgia and Alabama’s laws will be challenged in court.

But there is no reason to ever engage in violence when someone is exercising their right to free speech.

66 COMMENTS

  1. These pro death idiots do not have anything better to do than run around attacking peaceful anti-abortion women. I truly believe someone is paying them to do this. Other wise whr are they NOT AT WORK!

    • No one is pro death… no one is pro-abortion… but no one has the right to force a woman to make a very personal and painful decision about their life based on what you… typically a white male.. think. Really? You would force a 14-year-old rape victim to pay the consequences for her rapist for the rest of her life? If you look at the facts, abortion numbers have gone down where education and safe procedures are enacted. How would you take it, sir, if a group of women made it a crime for you to have an erection? Let’s have some sense here.

      • Since in the absence of an ‘abortion’ a BABY HUMAN BEING IS BORN someone that advocates the use of ‘abortion’ is advocating MURDER of a human being (small though it be) and is therefore Pro-Death (or Pro-MURDER take your pick).

      • Scott, quit making this about men vs women. U r engaged in “red herring tactics”. The demographic that z most pro-choice are MEN, ages 18-35. The niece of MLK, Jr has admitted that “35 white men” r the ones standing up for black babies.

      • Such stupidity rarely deserves a reply but the ignorance you displayed with your remark really needs to be addressed!
        First off; if any woman is raped and concerned that they may get pregnant, there is the option of a pill which will nullify that consequence and should be taken within hours of the alledged “rape” which far too many women claim AFTER they become pregnant; even when it was/is consensual!
        Second: you say no one is “pro-death/pro-abortion? Tell that to the killers in Planned Parenthood, not only murdering viable lives, but actually dismembering them and selling the body parts! Ironically; these are usually the same people who complain about meat eaters ‘killing’ animals to eat, or worry about some snail becoming extinct, etc. SUCH HYPOCRISY!
        You liberals really need to abort yourselves and save the planet!

          • Scott27 is obviously an imbecile. You can’t reason with an imbecile since imbeciles have no ability to reason. Let it go.

        • James…So you can’t be against killing a baby AND killing an animal?? I am against both. I myself would never kill an animal, but I understand killing on for food.

      • Scott look at the statistics. The largest group of woman having abortions are the 25 to 35 year old woman in a relationship. Their choice to have an abortion is a form of birth control for them. If you are too lazy or inconvenienced to make the “choice” to use protection with sex there are still things to do “the morning after”. Woman can’t decide for months to terminate a baby?? As for assault and rape on any woman or girl, a trip to the emergency room can take care of ANY issue with that assault. A woman will need counselling for an assault BUT she will also need counselling after having an abortion. Both scenarios will be with a woman forever. The bottom line to this issue that for Liberals and Dems there is no “choice” about whether to have a baby or abort it. It’s always abort. If you have the baby and either keep it or give it up for adoption there is something wrong with you according to them. Woman have control of their bodies. NO ONE is taking that away from them!!! Use ALL the choices you HAVE before having sex and stop with the hysterics of being controlled by laws or men. This on going argument of “choice” makes women look stupid and weak. If you are worried about becoming pregnant take precautions, say no, take immediate action after unprotected sex and stop making excuses for your irresponsibility and laziness. After all, the REASON for the sexual act IS PROCREATION!!! Spin it any other way you want but that IS the bottom line!!!

        • “The bottom line to this issue that for Liberals and Dems there is no “choice” about whether to have a baby or abort it. It’s always abort.” Part of the problem in finding some common sense and common ground here is this type of categorical nonsense.

      • Wow Scott..you sound like you learned well from your left wing liberal brainwashers at Commie University…how about this little untold fact..Planned Parenthood was created by the rascist Margaret Sanger for the purpose of keeping the minority population down.Ever notice what neighborhoods most PP’s are in?Minority neighborhoods.So perhaps us conservative white males are not the ones who are rascist.this issue is more of a spiritual issue as well..I will assume you do not believe there is a God..we who fight against abortion are believers.God is the one who chooses how life comes into the world..how and when..yes even rape..why is the birth of a baby conceived by rape a horrible thing?The rape itself is a horrific crime..but the baby born of it is an innocent little soul that does not deserve a death sentence.If you think abortion is a nice little proceedure that allows the woman to live happily ever after..you are wrong.The woman will suffer from depression and psychological problems for years.Killing is never right..no matter what the circumstance.Politicians greed and lies are what the abortion industry feeds on..they don’t give a damn about women or their health.

        • John L. Right on! You speak the truth! For some the truth is hard to hear. They’d rather bitch about something and take no action! People need to see and hear the TRUTH about abortion, see the abortionists actually MURDERING a LIVE HUMAN BEING, tearing their limbs apart, hearing the babies cries over and over again! The babies FEEL THE PAIN! And yet there are so many HEARTLESS SOULESS people out there that they won’t get it until someone starts tearing their body parts apart while they are alive. Bet they would be screaming STOP then!!!!!!!!!!

          • Nice imagery Sally… only it’s totally imagined. And if you think anyone does that after a baby is born, well, it’s just one of 10,000 lies you’ve been told, and believed, by the liar in chief.

          • Calling Pres. Trump a liar???? Hillary lies every time her lips move and Obama lied himself into the White House but that is just fine with you.

          • Scott…What Sally said is the truth. And it is the same baby in or out of the womb, just a different stage of development. It is just as evil to murder a baby before it is born as after

      • Scott…no one is pro death or pro abortion???? DEMS are!!! They are all for murdering babies even after they are born. And if a woman is raped, it is NOT the baby’s fault!!! There is no reason why she can’t give it up for adoption.

        • Reply is for Scott 27 on his ridiculous reply to Sally. Go see that movie about Planned Parenthood and then dare to say what you stated again. Your comments and up your a__. You know know absolutely nothing of what happens during an abortion, you are a fool if you believe any of the lies. Go get proof instead of believing the lies you obviously hear from other uninformed people or the fake news. Get real information instead of stupid lies. You must be either ignorant or a millenial.

      • Maybe planned parenthood should put its energy into finding homes for rape victims ( less than 1%) that do not want the child or the financial responsibilities. Why should an unborn child be destroyed because of something it had no hand in. To me it seems that the unborn child is held responsible for the entire rape. I know of plenty of parents young and older that would love to have a child but red tape and cost stymies it. Maybe some of the millions that we taxpayers give to PPH each year should go just for this cause. Just because you are a product of a rape doesn’t mean you are defective or not a living being. 98% of the abortions are not because of rape or medical reasons and this is what breaks my heart the most

    • Why is this so called woman not arrested? Why is this not a hate crime and she being prosecuted? Georgia, you need to stop these hate crimes and start arresting these sick murderers. If these so called people have all this time to attack people and don’t have real jobs maybe they should also be charged as intruders or whatever you call people that are invading without jobs and a threat to others.

  2. Start breaking some jaws on the pro-abortion crowd. Once they see there are consequences to their attacks things will change.

    • The police should start breaking some jaws – but they let them do what they want. If a pro-lifer attacks one of them, he is arrested and held on 50,000 bail

      • It was not the pro lifer who did the attacking….it was the planned parenthood pro baby killer who did. And they should be charged by the law accordingly! NO ONE has the right to attack another person especially because you dont like what they have to say. It’s called assault and battery!

  3. I recently learned that when a women becomes pregnant and has a baby if the man is not married to the woman he has no rights at the hospital to see the baby or make any decisions regarding that babies health if the woman does not want them there they can’t be there unless the woman says so. All you men out there whether you chose to be a dad or not you need to fight for your rights as the father. That baby is half yours! Stand up and start behaving like men. Band together and change the laws. It takes 2 to create human life. A child deserves to have a mother and a father…unless the bio parent is unfit. If you dont want children use protection or dont have sex.

    • That is a very good comment! My pro-choice daughter says that guys can just walk away and leave the problem to the females. I disagree with her in that you can use birth control and isn’t that the job of PP? This baby killing stuff by the Libs just infuriates me to the point that I want to go March for Life in DC! Shame on these inhumans, you wouldn’t even do that to animals. My granddaughter rescues cats in Hawaii because they are overrun by feral cats. She nurses them back to health and fixes them before they are released or adopted. The female ones always seem to be pregnant and she finds homes for nearly all of them. Can’t you baby killers do the same for humans??

    • REAL MEN will stay with the mother, support them both and make sure the child does not grow up to be an entitled, welfare cheating Democrat.

  4. The libs will probably avoid confronting armed protestors unless they’re completely deranged, in that case it’s self defense.

    • That’s a copout excuse so they dont have to be accountable for their actions. Then they should be detained in a psych hospital for their sentencing duration.

  5. Loretta you are the only one I’ve heard that explains what I have questioned all along. It takes two to have a baby. How is it that the Father justs walks away and has no say in what happens next. There is no excuse for unwanted pregnancy ! All the women have to do is refuse to have sex with a man or to use the pills to keep from getting pregnant. Better still is to wait until you are married and then have children when the baby will have both parents to raise them. But to kill the baby when you are the one who allowed this to happen is wrong and that woman will live with that fact all her life.

    • There are better ways to prevent unwanted babies. The old standbys of not having sex, or using the birth control pills have their own drawbacks. The “pill” has side effects that are best avoided. There is a better way, but it requires both to make it work as it should. This requires a level of responsibility that many may not want to do, because it can be ackward. The best answer for this issue is to use the methods that the Catholic church has discovered that works quite well, if both persons are willing to uphold the process. I happen to know that what the Catholic church’s method for family planning does indeed work. It is a simple matter of following the process of the mucus production that the woman produces from the beginning to the end of each cycle of her period. The end result can be all the children a couple may desire, or all the sex that is desired, without the worry of an unwanted pregnancy. Fully natural, no pills, no medical procedures, and the amorals can have all that they desire of sex, if they follow the plan as laid out and specified by the family planning office of the Catholic church. It does work, if there is the discipline to follow the plan.

    • REAL MEN will stay with the mother, support them both and make sure the child does not grow up to be an entitled, welfare cheating Democrat.

  6. A typical liberal lunatic, if you don’t agree and submit to their perverted agenda this how they act!! The liberal pro-choice advocates are very unstable people as we can all see!!

  7. As far as the father of the unborn child is concerned, there is always the chance that he’ll try to deny responsibility for the child.

  8. Anyone who attacks another person should be jailed. Noone has aright to attack another person. I would bring charges against the attacker and have her jailed. I would go to court and make her pay for all my medical bills I would demand a public apology as well as compensation for any physical and mental distress.

  9. Let’s see if we got this right…violent pro-murder, spoiled brats may attack pro-lifers steal their signs and hit them with it and receive a handkerchief to cry in, but if the pro-lifer defends themselves, they get hand-cuffs. It appears the insane are running the asylum as the authorities coddle the spoiled brats, however, the political climate may be maturing and the brats will be spanked.

  10. Uninformed people of voting age hear the propaganda of the left/Democrats, and don’t bother to analyze it. Most have heard of baby showers which to anyone with an I Q above dirt should be able, using reason, to realize that means a new person is about to enter the world, ergo, abortion is the killing of a baby!!!! As for the proper approach to pregnancy due to rape, the country’s taxes establish a “house” for the expectant mother where she will get counseling, medical care, a safe home and an organization who will find adoptive parents. Instead of giving PP millions of our tax money to continue their killing and butchering of the dead child so the parts can be sold for large sums of money. (One PP bigwig announced her plans to buy a Mozerati with the baby parts income.) This is the kind of female that is determined to change what was once a moral culture to something from the bowels of HELL> Perhaps the word restraint should be taught
    in schools so the disaster of out of control sex from teens all the way up to those leaders of today’s culture, Hollywood and New York, just might get the message, though I doubt it.

    • Schools refuse to teach abstinence (the only guaranteed way to not get pregnant) as a choice to prevent pregnancy they go in with the liberals attitude that they are going to have sex anyway just show them how to be “safe” and rely on abortion when that fails.

      They feel its to close to establishing RELIGIOUS MORTALITY to tell them about abstinence they might actually use it as a means of birth control costing Planned Parenthood (who is behind most of these sex ed programs) millions of dollars.

  11. It’s interesting that the democrats cry for the protection of illegals but think murdering a baby is ok. Band of hypocrits.

  12. 19,000 children die each day, and you want to bring more children into our world to suffer immeasurably a living hell in poverty, sickness, and starvation? are you going to give these children a good life, free of poverty, sickness, and starvation? the world is over populated, and these are the end times, and it will not be good for people with children, Saul’s God told Saul to kill every man, woman, and child, what do you think about Saul’s God?

    • Bryce, there are lots of people wanting to adopt children. And you are truly CLUELESS!!!!!!! Please read the New Testament. NO!!! Saul’s God DID NOT tell him to kill anyone!!!! There is ONE God, and He forbids murder. It is God who STOPPED Paul and saved him. It is SATAN who convinced Paul to kill. You are very mixed up. Read the TRUTH!!! And God FORBIDS the murder of babies whether in or out of the womb. It is murder either way. Jesus said woe unto those who harm a child.

    • I am quite certain GOD does NOT want us killing babies or anyone!!!…he said “I knew you before I formed you in the womb”

  13. When Attila and his boys rode through a town, slaughtering anyone that they felt like, including small children and babies, the victims assumed that they were being murdered. In those days, the invaders were assumed to be savages and barbarians, correctly.
    Today, as in the 20th and 21st centuries, we apparently live in an ” enlightened ” age, where the same slaughter is alright, because it is done with modern technology, and besides, those babies are only by-products of an act which everyone enjoyed at the time, so, why bother with the result, if its a child? It can’t defend itself, and it is little, therefore, it is not murder, or the same as killing someone who is older.
    If you reach the age of one or so, you may not be murdered, but the savages of today think that it is ok just because the person being murdered is helpless and not that old.
    Attila rode a horse. Today’s barbarians drive a car. That is the main difference. Otherwise, put everyone to the sword.
    God awaits.

  14. Want to stop abortions? Tell the mother that the next Pol Pot, Che, Castro, Lenin or #metoo Qamala Harris is being murdered.

  15. A rational, secular case exists for the rights of the unborn. Individual human life is a continuum from fertilization until natural death. Zygote, embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, adolescent, adult, etc. are all different stages of human development. To destroy that life at any stage of development is to destroy that individual.

    The real question in the abortion debate is not necessarily the seemingly absurd scenario of giving human rights to human zygotes, but rather the thorny question of how to legally protect those rights without violating a new mother’s privacy and civil liberties.

    And the right to privacy is not absolute. If parents are abusing an already born child, for example, government “intrusion” is warranted—children have rights.

    Recognizing the rights of another class of beings limits our freedoms and our choices and requires a change in our lifestyle—the abolition of (human) slavery is a good example of this.

    A 1964 New Jersey court ruling required a pregnant woman to undergo blood transfusions—even if her religion forbade it—for the sake of her unborn child.

    One could argue, therefore—apart from religion—that recognizing the rights of the unborn, like the rights of blacks, women, LGBTs, children, animals and the environment, is a sign of social progress.

    The humanity of the unborn: Are the unborn human? Yes. Biologically, the unborn are not only human, they have an individual human genetic identity; 46 human chromosomes.

    Virtually all medical authorities (physicians, biologists, etc.) agree with geneticist Ashley Montagu who wrote: “the fact is simple. Life begins not at birth, but at conception.”

    J. Lejeune of Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down’s syndrome, observed: “Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”

    When does human life begin? “At conception,” states Professor W. Bowes of the University of Colorado.

    Professor M. Matthews-Roth of Harvard writes: “It is scientifically correct to say that individual human life begins at conception.”

    Dr. Mary Calderon of Planned Parenthood in the 1960s, wrote: “Fertilization has taken place; a baby has been conceived.”

    Everything that defines a person physically is present at fertilization—only oxygen, nutrients and time to develop are required.

    The unborn child has his or her own genetic code, EEG trackings, and circulatory system. Often, the blood type and sex of the unborn child will also differ from that of the mother. The heart of the unborn child begins beating at 18 days, and is pumping blood at 21 days.

    The brain is functioning at 40 days—EEG trackings have been made at less than six weeks gestation. The unborn child responds to stimuli by the sixth to eighth week. Rapid Eye Movements (REMs) characteristic of actual dream states, are present in 23 weeks.

    There are clearly two distinct individuals (mother and child) present during pregnancy.

    “I will maintain the utmost respect for human life, from the time of conception; even under threat, I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity.”

    –Declaration of Geneva, World Medical Association, September, 1948

    “The child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth.”

    –A Declaration of the Rights of the Child, United Nations General Assembly, 1959

    “Is birth control an abortion?”

    “Definitely not. An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun.”

    –Planned Parenthood pamphlet, August 1963

    “Every person has the right to have his life respected, this right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”

    –American Convention on Human Rights in San Jose, November 22, 1969

    “The reverence of each and every human life has been the keystone of Western medicine… it has been necessary to separate the idea of abortion from the idea of killing, which continues to be socially abhorrent. The result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continuous, whether intra- or extra-uterine. The very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking a human life would be ludicrous if they were not put forth under socially impeccable auspices.”

    –Editorial, Journal of the California State Medical Association, September 1970

    In 1972, the National Organization for Women (NOW) expelled all its pro-life members in order to stifle dissent on the abortion issue. These pro-life feminists went on to form their own organization. Feminists For Life has chapters in the United States, Canada and New Zealand.

    In her article “Feminism and Abortion: The Great Inconsistency” (The New Zealand Listener, January 7, 1978), Daphne de Jong responded to the abortion-rights argument that the unborn child is merely part of its mother and not a separate individual human being endowed with human rights:

    “Until this century, the laws of both Britain and America made women a ‘part of’ their husbands.

    “’By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law…our law in general considers man and wife one person.’ (Blackstone’s Commentaries, 1768)

    “The one person was, of course, the husband, who exerted absolute power over his wife and her property. She had no existence and therefore no protection under the law. The only thing a husband could not do was kill her.

    “The earliest feminist battles were fought against the legal chattel status of women. Many feminists were among those who overturned the U.S. Supreme Court decision of 1857, that a black slave was ‘property’ and not entitled to the protection of the Constitution.

    “Feminism totally rejected the concept of ownership in regard to human beings. Yet when the Court ruled in 1973 that the fetus was the property of its mother, and not entitled to the protection of the Constitution, ‘liberated’ women danced in the streets.”

    The arguments about “choice” and/or “a woman’s right to choose” don’t go anywhere, either, as recognizing the rights of another class of beings limits our freedoms and our choices, and requires a change in our personal lifestyle.

    Pro-life feminist Juli Loesch wrote:

    “Each woman has the right (to contraception)… But once a woman has conceived, she can no longer choose whether or not to become a mother. Biologically, she is already a mother… the woman’s rights are then limited, as every right is limited, by the existence of another human being who also has rights.”

    Recognizing the rights of another class of beings limits our freedoms and our choices and requires a change in our lifestyle — the abolition of (human) slavery is a good example of this.

    Are whites free to own slaves or lynch blacks?

    No! Because of the civil rights movement, we’ve corrected that injustice.

    Is domestic violence tolerated?

    No! Because of the women’s movement, domestic violence is unacceptable.

    Should hate crimes against LGBTs be permitted under the guise of “choice”?

    No! LGBTs have rights.

    This isn’t rocket science, but if animals have rights, then our freedoms and choices to commit crimes against animals are similarly limited.

    “Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment,” insists People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

    As the animal rights movement continues to influence mainstream society, humankind is finally ending millennia of injustices against animals.

    The abortion debate focuses on the personhood or moral status of the unborn…

    …which is weakened when species membership is no longer the deciding factor — if it ever was!

    When this country was founded, blacks were three-fifths of a person, women were the property of their husbands, Native Americans were killed for “sport,” etc.

    Historically, personhood never encompassed the entire human species.

    (And even now, humans hold widely differing views on when it is acceptable to kill other humans — consider the endless debates over abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, war, etc.)

    Why, then, should personhood end with the human species?

    Apart from personhood, the abortion debate focuses on the extent of individual and/or marital privacy.

    Can we protect human zygotes and embryos without violating a new mother’s privacy and civil liberties?

    The directly related issues of privacy and civil liberties occur in issues other than contraception and abortion.

    In his 1992 book Visions of Liberty, Ira Glasser, former Executive Director of the ACLU, points out that electronic surveillance technology was developed during the Prohibition era, and was used in the 1960s to target gambling.

    (Electronic surveillance is currently being used in the war on drugs, and nearly 75 percent of the drug war is directed solely against marijuana, which is safer than alcohol and/or tobacco.)

    Even pro-lifers demand privacy for themselves… but conservative pro-lifers ridicule the “privacy” argument used to justify abortion-rights.

    Calvin Freiburger on the Live Action News blog writes, “Privacy: the dumbest argument for legal abortion.”

    (Will Calvin Freiburger protest or speak out if he finds himself living unwillingly under electronic surveillance?)

    Conservatives claim the right to privacy (e.g., Griswold v. Connecticut and the subsequent Supreme Court decisions on individual and/or marital privacy) is only an implied right, not clearly spelled out in the Constitution…

    …the Constitution only protects us against unwarranted search and seizure (Fourth Amendment).

    At a Respect Life conference several years ago, I asked Kristan Hawkins of Students For Life if Roe v. Wade could be overturned without overturning Griswold v. Connecticut as well.

    She gave me a confusing answer, first talk about chastity, and then saying Griswold is “settled law.”

    But that’s what Justice John Roberts said about Roe v. Wade, too!

    Whether or not Roe v. Wade will ever be overturned is debatable, especially when Justice John Roberts refers to Roe as “settled law.”

    (When I was younger, I contributed $1,008 to the ACLU Foundation, not because I’ve suddenly become a huge fan of partial-birth abortions, but because having lived unwillingly under electronic surveillance, like a political prisoner, with persons around me wired for sound, and my past probed to a degree no real life political or religious figure has had to endure, it’s my conviction we have a right to privacy.)

    I think rape is a fairly accurate word to describe an electronic invasion of privacy (e.g., Erin Andrews), whether it happens in the bedroom and/or bathroom, whether it happens to a minor or an adult, and whether the victim happens to be female or male.

    “The moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped.”

    –Hubert H. Humphrey

    Fifty-nine percent of Democrats favored a ban on partial-birth abortion. (Gallup Poll, November 1, 2000)

    Eighty-nine percent of Americans favored informed consent for women seeking abortions. (Gallup Poll, 2002)

    Sixty-seven percent of Democrats would outlaw some or all abortions. (Gallup Poll, May 5-7, 2003)

    Forty-three percent of Democrats agreed with the statement that abortion”destroys a human life and is manslaughter.” (Zogby Poll, December 2004)

    Seventy percent of high school senior females say they would not consider abortion if they became pregnant while in high school. (Hamilton College/Zogby Poll, January 2008)

    Seventy-seven percent of Americans believe abortion should have stricter limitations. (CBS News Poll, January 2008)

    Kristen Day of Democrats For Life of America (DFLA) recently said:

    “Roughly a third of the Democratic Party is pro-life. And while many do not call themselves liberal, they share the values which seem to identify with liberalism, particularly a commitment to helping the vulnerable and providing a social safety net.”

    James Tunstead Burtchaell, a Catholic priest and author of Rachel Weeping: the Case Against Abortion, accused Jimmy Carter of “waffling” on the abortion issue.

    Abortion IS a secular human rights issue, but there ARE valid reasons for liberals to be lukewarm about criminalizing abortion (privacy and civil liberties concerns; the debate over the personhood of the unborn; the endless debates over when it is acceptable for humans to kill other humans; even many opposed to abortion say criminalization won’t work or they don’t want to impose their religious beliefs upon others, etc.)…

    …the argument about the unborn child being part of its mother is not one of them!

    Remember, there are *two* bodies present during pregnancy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

  16. I am pro life. If a girl or woman has been raped. Give that child up for adoption. I know people who want kids & can’t have any.

  17. poor Scott 27, Finally a baby killer want a be has listed his IQ as 27. That is so low I do not know how Scott 27 can go to the toilet alone. And for sure Scott 27 can not offer an intelligence reason why murdering an infant, a baby, a person known of God while still in the secret place of the mother to be is a good thing. How will you explain that to God when you appear before the Great White Throne Judgement seat of God read about your reward in the book of the Bible known as The Revelation (the last book of the Bible) turn to chapter 20 look for verse 11 read down to verse 15. Notice your reward for murder is forever & forever in a pit of flames.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here