A major Democrat’s anti-Semitic secret is about to take down the entire party

85

Democrats are desperately working to prove they aren’t racist or anti-Semitic.

But a series of scandals all across the country are making that all but impossible.

And a major Democrat’s anti-Semitic secret just came to light and it could take down the entire party.

Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) is facing harsh backlash from figures on both sides of the political spectrum due to anti-Semitic comments she has made.

Not only that, but she has been spotted alongside figures sympathetic to the viciously
anti-Israel terrorist organization Hezbollah.

So Democrats are in a difficult position relating to Rep. Tlaib, who many consider a rising star in the Democrat Party.

And things will only get more difficult for them in light of an unearthed column by Tlaib published in the Nation of Islam’s official publication Final Call.

Nation of Islam is led by the radical, anti-Semitic, hate-preacher Louis Farrakhan.

Farrakhan is a black nationalist who has called Adolf Hitler a “great man.”

As reported by Fox News:

“Freshman Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib once wrote a column for the Final Call, an official publication of the Nation of Islam and its notorious leader Louis Farrakhan.

Tlaib, a Palestinian American, has been facing criticism ever since her arrival in Congress and promise to impeach President Trump using profane language.

She later came under bipartisan criticism from Jewish groups for appearing with radical anti-Israel activists during her swearing-in ceremony in Michigan, with some activists previously praising terror group Hezbollah and Palestinian terrorists, and saying that Israel has no right to exist.”

The connection between the Democrat Party and Farrakhan has been a long-held secret that has only recently come to light.

A picture from 2005 showing former President Barack Obama with Farrakhan was unveiled last year, with the photographer stating he kept it secret until Obama was out of office as not to harm him in the election.

So clearly, connections to Farrakhan are something that Democrat Party bigwigs were worried about.

But some members of their party – including Representatives Tlaib and Ilhan Omar are openly embracing anti-Semitic and radical Islamist ways.

They seem to believe the way to get elected is to become even more radical.

Do you think Democrats are the party of racism and bigotry?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

85 COMMENTS

  1. dems hate this country and everything it stands for, including our Constitution and our freedom. They are very dangerous. They must be defeated if we want to keep the country our founding fathers gave us.

      • every time i see her face it reminds me of the Asian decease, the Exactly’s, the decease called Exactly’s is when your face looks Exactly like your As$$, and I bet hers match perfectly. and i have only seen her face.

    • the dems proved it by voting in muslims in our country, they should all be put out of our govt. they have no place in our country. also this women should be taken care of , her mouth should be shut, she is and looks like a pig.

      • I would like to see a law put in affect like the one that you must be born in the USA to be President. Why not inact a law that applies to Federal offices (Congress and Senate) have to be born in the USA or having been a legal documented US citizen for a period of 25 years before they can run for office.

    • Well of course they are antisimentic . They always have caused hatred and dissiention. And now that they have corrupted the education system to the point that current education has fallen to embarrassing levels so far that we are ranked at the bottom of the list for developed country’s.

    • Hate has been around for time on end, but the Jews will see it for what it is, you are seeing it up front, a remembarance that will be forgotten.

    • This thing has no clue what she wants. She’s an idiot and a fool. If she loves this so much, send her packing where this law is in affect. Let her have to live under it.

      • HOW did these two Moslems ever get into the Government??
        This means GOOD BYE to The America that was fought for and enjoyed.
        This is a disastrous situation, period. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!

        • Just look at the two states which elected them. Both have huge populations of muslimes. Same exact thing happened to Europe. They are a lost cause. It’s too late foe Europe, but America had better wake up.

        • The goal of Islam is complete and total world control. Their goal here is to replace our Constitution with sharia law. Muslims are not even allowed in this country. Obama brought in hundreds of thousands of them knowing full well what their intentions are. Minnesota brought in thousands of Somalis. Libs want to destroy this country and they are doing a good job of it

    • bj, the Zionists are overrunning this forum. Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu: “My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.”

    • And they are against God. But Americans citizens need to educate and inform ignorant voters that want to include Satan”s supporters into America government. The Qur’an is very clear that Muslims Cannot be a friend of American Christians and the Jews.

    • People forget that the Jews are God’s chosen people. If you go against them, you will pay. I don’t believe that anyone should be in Congress, that will not pledge allegiance to our country!!

  2. Maybe it’s time to let the people of Michigan know that if they keep electing Radicals to office we will buy our cars elsewhere.Its time to wake up. We are losing our country

    • The only way to defeat these vermin is to stop doing business with a company associated with the Muslim religion. If you cannot distinguish the religion, ask them if they are Muslim. If they DE neigh their faith it is a Shure road to hell.

  3. The demonrats have proven themselves racists from the beginning of our Country. Every bill passed by congress to give rights to the minority (should have never been necessary) were passed by the Republicans with little support from the demonrats. Of course they are racists.

  4. Tlaib and Omar should be ousted from Congress. They are hateful, foul mouthed, anti American, and Muslims. They should never have been elected to any position in our government. How the DemocRATS can support these Muslims is beyond belief, but when you look at what the DemocRATic party has become, it’s no wonder anymore.

  5. Well, People what the hell is this Anti-Semitic Radical Muslim doing in the American Congress especially when she has close ties to Hezbollah? If she has close ties to Hezbollah that is an Anti-Israel terrorist group then she herself is an Anti-Israel. Anti-Jewish Terrorist and should be kicked out of The United States Congress and then kicked out of The United States of America. These two Muslims are very dangerous to the United States and should not be in this or any Government position.

  6. This is a fantastic example of what the Democratic party has become. These people are voted into office by stupid people who are not only stupid, but are looking to get something for nothing. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. When the Dems gain control of the country, they will turn on their constituents, as well as the rest of us, and then it will be too late. Wake up America. We are about to lose the farm.

  7. She is a Muslime. She shouldn’t be in this country, let alone hold any kind of public office. If she can be anti-Semitic, I should be able to be anti-muslim.

  8. Irene I said before the election that if the democrats got a foot hold in our Government what was going to be. Its here so we either sit on our asses or fight them with every thing we can to stop them.

  9. If you’re a USA CITIZEN , and didn’t vote in the MID TERM, THIS IS ‘ YOUR FAULT. Y O U ; R E FAULT. Any blood that is about to be shed by PATRIOYS fighting to save OUR USA will be on YOU’RE HANDS The ONLY REASON these muslime pieces of feces won is because TRUMP SUPPORTERS DIDN’T VOTE… Many are going to lose loved ones during CIVIL WAR II. Bring your own TOE TAG.

  10. Yes they are both Muslin scum, but they were lawfully elected and now the only way to get them out of DC is impeachment, which the Dumocrats would fight just to save face, if we had National Referendum, we the people could get their names on the National Ballot and possibly vote them out of office as well as voting in term limits for all federal elective offices, which would get rid of the Pelosis and Schumer’s, our founding fathers never meant for politicians to be a lifetime job, they were supposed to be served their country for a term or 2 and then go back to their jobs at home.

  11. She should be removed from Congress immediately. She has proven her loyalty is not to the USA of America but to the Country and Muslims that wish to infiltrate and destroy our Christian faith, our freedom that our fore fathers fought for and the great Country we have today. Remove her now! She has betrayed our Country.

  12. These Muslim women are just as bad as their husbands and male Muslims. They are complicate in the horrible treatment. They are like savages, scary & not to be trusted. You see it over and over again where they are involved in the crimes that are committed. I think Rashida Tlaib is scary!!! I am very sorry someone like her is in our Congress, it should not happen.

  13. No what they attempt to portray, the democrat party has always been the party of hate, anti-Israel, and pro-islam!! They are complete traitors to this Republic, the United States of America! They should be ashamed, but they have no morals!

  14. These two women are the point of the knife to get male Muslims accepted in office. Muslims have figured out that the west has a thing for women always trusting them to be non violent but the west still hesitates around Muslim men. These women have their male’s permission to be the trojan horse for political positions. Next will come “nice” Muslim men into the positions the women have opened up for the men. Just remember that Mohammed teaches women are below men at the level of animals and are to be treated as animals and Muslim men will use their women for themselves including having them put on bombs and going into the enemy and denotating the bombs killing themselves. Don’t think the women are in Congress for this country and Muslim women, they are in Congress being sent by their Muslim men to open the way for Muslim men.

  15. What about all of the OTHER Democrats who are open Anti-Semites?
    Half of the Black Caucus bows down to Louis Farakhan who is a known hater of Jews and Christians.
    That includes Maxine Waters who love to smile and pose with this evil hater.
    This has been a cover up by the Dem Party but hiding in plain sight-when are the Media ever going to be Honest?

    • Phyllis, don’t hold your breath. The vast percentage of Lame Stream media are dyed in the wool demonrats and will probably never report on any of this corruption.

    • Tony, the young people are being taught this crap in college. For the most part, college in our country is a sad joke. Look at all the colleges pushing the anti Israel BS. College graduates really need to be de-programmed just to empty their brains of the crap they are taught. It’s not looking good for our Country.

  16. You idiots. First of all, she is hardly a major Democrat. Secondly, the Democrats have criticized her as much if not more than the Republicans have. And the reason that is is because Republicans are scared to death of being held to the standard they want to hold Democrats to. Because if they were, so called President Trump would be in Super-Max.

    • Eric, your democrats have only three standards, lie, cheat and rape/molest, would not know truth if life depended on it, and you lost your brains where. Oh yea, liberal collage that lied to you whole time you went there. Sure did not teach you to find out truth and think for yourself.

  17. It is now communist Democratic party and all the redicals should be thrown out and if not citizen allowed to run for any office above local level. Democrates are a disgrace to our country and way of life and any Muslim and their Koran are against constitution and Bill of right and should not be allowed to hold any office. If they cannot take oath on bible, cannot take office as been done for over 200 years.

  18. How are Democrats anti-semitic when the majority of American Jews are Democrats, supporting Israel, etc.? it’s pro-life Republicans stereotyping, lumping people into group, etc. They seem to think vegetarianism is associated solely with the Hare Krishnas. They seem to think if they grasp at straws to label the Hare Krishnas as “Jews” (e.g., citing Srila Prabhupada’s use of the word “dog” to describe anyone not on the platform of four regs and sixteen rounds, when he would make use of half a dozen different animal words to describe sinners — dogs, hogs, crows, cows, camels, asses, etc. — and with reincarnation in mind, which is quite different from the Judaic use of the word, although in II Peter 2:12, St. Peter compares sinners to irrational brute beasts), then they think they’ve discredited vegetarianism as someone else’s “religious belief” which they think doesn’t apply to them, forgetting a lot of people look at abortion that way, too! (I notice they’re not concerned with whether Dr. Willke “worked” for his salvation, etc.)

    If they really want to sweep a serious moral issue (the ethical treatment of animals, which mankind has grappled with from Pythagoras to PETA) under the rug as someone else’s “religious belief,” I must point out in past decades, the stereotype of “religious vegetarians” was that they’re all followers of the ancient eastern reincarnationist religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, believing in rebirth in lower species as a punishment for sinning, believing you might be reincarnated as a cow in your next life if you’re not careful, Hinduism and her sacred cows, a belief in karma and reincarnation as the basis for the kinship of all life rather than, say, Darwinian evolution, etc.

    If they were to invoke that kind of a stereotype, we would be sitting ducks. But they seem to have an irrational hatred of Jews, and label us “Jews” even when I show time and again how way off base that is! Jews and Muslims don’t worship images, nor believe in the incarnations of God, nor worship a plural Godhead similar to that of Trinitarian Christianity, nor worship other human beings (saints and spiritual masters in discipline succession, etc.).

    Even in the West, before the British Vegetarian Society was founded in the middle of the 19th century and the term “vegetarian” was coined, vegetarians were referred to as “Pythagoreans.” Along the lines of the Hindu belief in different yugas or ages, the ancient Greeks similarly believed in ages of gold, silver, iron, etc., believed that in past ages, civilizations were more enlightened, the gods would visit the earth, mate with earthly women, giving rise to heroic and noble children, etc.

    Pythagoras taught karma and reincarnation. It is said Pythagoras once stopped a man from beating a dog, because in the dog’s yelping he recognized the voice of an old friend. Pythagoras taught his followers not to kill even a flea, especially in a temple, and Srila Prabhupada similarly said when you kill any living entity, even an ant, you are interfering with its spiritual progress towards eventually receiving a human body and the opportunity to escape the cycle of repeated birth and death. Pythagoras abhorred animal sacrifice and wine, too.

    The Pythagoreans recognized a pantheon of demigods as well as a Supreme Being, with the sun-god being especially prominent. Lord Krishna spoke Bhagavad-gita to the sun-god millions of years before He spoke it to His disciple Arjuna in 3138 BC. The Pythagoreans similarly contributed to medical ethics through the Oath of Hippocrates. The Oath reads: “I swear by Apollo Physician, by Asclepius… I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgement, but never with a view to injury and wrong-doing. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly, I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion… Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free.”

    During the abortion debate on USENET in 1986, pro-choicers argued the reference to abortion in the Oath was not written with respect for life, but intended to prevent “back-alley” abortions. The United States Supreme Court, however, clearly saw the Oath as pro-life in Roe v. Wade, downgrading the historical influence of the Oath of Hippocrates, by noting it “echoes Pythagorean doctrines,” and the Pythagoreans were a minority religion in ancient Greece.

    The philosopher Empodocles (5th century BC) wrote that the ancients were much more fortunate than modern man because they were vegetarian and there was neither animal sacrifices nor war. He described humanity in previous ages using statues, pictures, perfumes and honey in their worship. They did not offer animals, Empodocles maintained, because to kill an animal for sacrifice or food is the greatest moral wrong. Empodocles described these ancient races as gentle to animals and birds as well as to each other. Empodocles was greatly influenced by Pythagorean doctrine. He believed in the transmigration of souls. Because of reincarnation and the equality of all living beings, Empodocles felt meat-eating was comparable to cannibalism. “Will ye not cease from this great din of slaughter?” he once wrote. “Will ye not see, unthinking as ye are, how ye rend one another unbeknoweth?”

    Srila Prabhupada said the ancient civilizations were ruled by “rajarshis” or saintly kings. Plato also developed a theory that it would not be possible to have a just and good society until kings were philosophers or until philosophers became kings. In this way, the leaders would have a true understanding of justice and virtue, and would be able to rule properly for the benefit of all the citizens. According to Plato, the ideal society consists of three classes of men: the governing class, the military class, and the mercantile class. Perhaps because he lived in a slave state, Plato failed to recognize laborers as a fourth, or working class. However, he taught that people fall into different classes according to their talents and abilities, rather than as a result of their birth. Plato taught further that women are recognized as equals with men in the ideal society, and may also become rulers, soldiers, or merchants.

    Platonic philosophy is nearly Vedic! Hindu historian A. Kalyanaraman believes Plato failed to recognize laborers as a fourth, or working class, since he lived in a slave state. Kalyanaraman supports this observation by citing evidence from the principle Hindu scriptures, known as the Vedas, as well as the testimony of Megasthenes, who journeyed from the Greco-Roman world to India during the 3rd century BC. Kalyanaraman finds a great deal of political freedom and equality in ancient India, where social mobility was acknowledged. The Vedas describe numerous saints and sages who were of low birth, but were considered by their virtue to have been raised to the highest status.

    The Greek Megasthenes observed: “The law ordains that none among them under any circumstances be a slave; enjoying freedom, they shall expect the equal right to it which others possess… All Indians are free and not one of them is a slave. The Indians do not use even aliens as slaves; much less a countryman of their own.”

    The earliest moral and legal codes (Dharma-sastras and Niti-sastras) originated in India, as did the earliest representative institutions (Sabha and Parishad). A modern Western text, India: Yesterday and Today, similarly says, “the four orders… of Hindu society… were classes in the Western sense rather than castes in the Indian manner.”

    Plato’s writings contain frequent references to reincarnation. The souls of animals and the souls of men are taught to be of equal worth. This is made clear in the story of Er. (Republic 614-621) In this story, souls with human bodies become animals in their next life, while souls clothed in animal bodies become human. Plato presented detailed accounts of reincarnation in many of his other writings. (Phaedrus 248c; Phaedo 81-83, 85a; Meno 81b; Timaeus 90e-91c, etc.)

    According to Plato, pure souls have fallen from the plane of absolute reality because of sensual desire, and have taken on physical bodies. First, the fallen souls are embodied in human forms. Of these, the highest is that of the philosopher, who delights in higher knowledge, and lives on the level of the mind, rather than the body. As long as he remains caught up in the heavenly spheres, he returns to eternal life and existence. But if he becomes entangled in carnal desires, he will descend into the animal kingdom. Plato believed gluttons and drunkards could easily become asses in future lifetimes, cruel and violent people may take birth as hawks or wolves, and blind followers of social convention may be reborn as bees or ants. Eventually, the soul will again receive another human body, and with it another opportunity to seek first the spiritual kingdom, righteousness, and eternal life.

    Plato wrote about ethics, politics, justice, knowledge, virtue, the soul, rebirth, judgment, heaven, hell, monastic living, and a transcendent realm of goodness. The early church historian Eusebius observed: “Plato, more than anyone else, shared in the philosophy of Pythagoras.” Early church father Justin Martyr is known to have said repeatedly that Plato must have been versed in Christian prophecy.

    Again, if pro-life Christians were to invoke that kind of a stereotype, we would be sitting ducks. But they seem to have an irrational hatred of Jews, and label us “Jews” even when I show time and again how way off base that is! Jews and Muslims don’t worship images, nor believe in the incarnations of God, nor worship a plural Godhead similar to that of Trinitarian Christianity, nor worship other human beings (saints and spiritual masters in discipline succession, etc.).

  19. Nazi demonrats ish to make us slaves…or send us to the ovens…Omar the tentmaker. Overly-contemptible, and really terrible know no shame.

  20. “Do you think Democrats are the party of racism and bigotry?” Yes! They not only are, but always have been. Growing more so though. They are losing many who they managed to deceive in the past.

  21. I spend every day say that these Rag Head Muslins have got to be returned to their countries they came from. It need to be done NOW. They are trash and we don’t need anyone trying to turn the US into a Shera Law state. All and anyone associated with them have got to go also. You know how sick they are if they worship
    Louis Farrakhan.

  22. The real cause of anti-semitism: Christians put Paul ahead of Jesus!

    ZedMont writes on the Daily Kos:

    “The Christianity you see today is not the Christianity practiced by Jesus’ apostles. It is the Christianity that was unknown until the self-appointed ‘apostle’ Paul invented it, based on his personal, unwitnessed conversations with a vision of the resurrected Jesus, years after the crucifixion.”

    Agreed. The late Reverend Janet Regina Hyland (1933 – 2007), author of God’s Covenant with Animals (it’s available through People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA) once said to me in a phone conversation, what makes Paul’s “revelation” any more valid than Mohammed’s or Joseph Smith’s? Even Oral Roberts claimed to have a vision of a 900-foot Jesus in 1987!

    The scribes and the Pharisees, Jesus claimed, “have neglected the weightier matters of the Law; justice and mercy and faith.” (Matthew 23:14,16-23; Luke 11:42, 20:45-47)

    This is painfully obvious when contrasting Paul’s pronouncements on the Law with those of Jesus.

    The most-repeated argument against biblical vegetarianism I’ve gotten from Christians is that they claim they are no longer under Mosaic Law, because the apostle Paul referred to his background as a former Pharisee and his previous adherence to Mosaic Law (with its dietary laws, commandments calling for the humane treatment of animals, etc.) as “so much garbage.” (Philippians 3:4-8)

    Nothing in the synoptic gospels suggests a break with Judaism. Jesus was called “Rabbi,” meaning “Master” or “Teacher,” 42 times in the gospels. Jesus’ ministry was rabbinic. Jesus related scripture and God’s laws to everyday life, teaching by personal example. Jesus engaged in healing and acts of mercy. Jesus told stories or parables — a rabbinic method of teaching.

    Jesus went to the synagogue (Matthew 12:9), taught in the synagogues (Matthew 4:23, 13:54; Mark 1:39), expressed concern for Jairus, “one of the rulers of the synagogue” (Mark 5:36) and it “was his custom” to go to the synagogue (Luke 4:16).

    Jesus called himself “Son of Man.” The prophet Ezekiel was addressed by God as “Son of Man.” (Ezekiel 2:1) In Hebrew, “son of man” (“ben adam”) was a synonym for “man.” Psalm 8:4 uses it in plural. Simon (Peter) referred to Jesus as “a man certified by God.” (Acts 2:22)

    Both John the Baptist and Jesus were considered prophets by the people. (Matthew 11:9, 21:11, 21:26, 21:46; Mark 6:15, 11:32; Luke 7:16, 7:26, 9:19, 24:19; John 4:19, 6:14, 7:40, 9:17)

    Jesus placed himself in the tradition of the prophets before him. (Matthew 13:57; Mark 6:4; Luke 4:24, 13:33; John 4:44)

    Jesus frequently compared his ministry to the ministries of Noah, Lot and Jonah. (Matthew 10:15, 11:24, 12:39-40, 16:4, 24:37-39; Luke 10:12, 11:29,32, 17:26-29,32)

    Jesus began his ministry by teaching the multitudes not to “give what is sacred to the dogs, nor cast your pearls before swine.” (Matthew 7:6) Dogs, like swine, were considered foul and unclean by the Hebrew people. (Deuteronomy 23:18; I Samuel 24:14; II Kings 8:13; Psalm 22:16,20; Matthew 7:6; Luke 16:21; Revelations 22:15) These words were used by the children of Israel to describe the neighboring heathen populations.

    When sending his disciples out to preach, Jesus instructed them not to go to the gentiles, but to “go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 10:5-6) When a Canaanite woman asked Jesus to heal her daughter, he replied, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel…It is not fair to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.” (Matthew 15:22-28)

    Jesus regarded the gentiles as “dogs.” His gospel was intended for the Jewish people. Even the apostle Paul admitted that the gospel was first intended for the Jews, and that the Jews have every advantage over the gentiles in this regard (Romans 1:16, 3:1-2).

    When a scribe asked Jesus what is the greatest commandment in the Torah, Jesus began with “Hear O Israel, the Lord, thy God, is One Lord.” This is the Shema, which is still heard in every synagogue service to this day.

    “And you shall love the Lord with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength… And you shall love your neighbor as yourself,” Jesus concluded.

    When the scribe agreed that God is one and that to love Him completely and also love one’s neighbor as oneself is “more important than all the whole burnt offerings and sacrifices,” Jesus replied, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” (Matthew 22:36-40; Mark 12:29-34; Luke 10:25-28)

    In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus himself said:

    “Do not suppose I have come to abolish the Law and the prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill…till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle pass from the Law till all is fulfilled. Whoever, therefore, breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven…unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:17-20)

    Jesus also upheld the Torah in Luke 16:17:

    “And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest portion of the Law to become invalid.”

    Nor do these words refer merely to the Ten Commandments. Jesus meant the entire Torah: 613 commandments. When a man asked Jesus what he must do to inherit eternal life, Jesus replied, “You know the commandments.” He then quoted not just the Ten Commandments, but a commandment from Leviticus 19:13 as well: “Do not defraud.” (Mark 10:17-22)

    Jesus’ disciples were once accused by the scribes and Pharisees of violating rabbinical tradition (Matthew 15:1-2; Mark 7:5), but not biblical law. At no place in the entire New Testament does Jesus ever proclaim Torah or the Law of Moses to be abolished; this was the theology of Paul, a former Pharisee who never knew Jesus, but who used to persecute Jesus’ followers. Paul openly identified himself not as a Jew but as a Roman (Acts 22:25-26) and an apostate from Judaism (Philippians 3:4-8)

    Sometimes Christians cite Matthew 7:12, where Jesus says “Do unto others…” and this “covers” the Law and the prophets.

    But Jesus was merely repeating in the positive what Rabbi Hillel taught earlier.

    Hillel was asked, “What is Judaism?”

    He replied: “What is hateful to you, do not do unto others. That is Judaism. All the rest is commentary.”

    No one took Hillel’s words to mean the Law had been abolished — why should we assume this of Jesus?

    If Jesus really came to abolish the Law and the prophets, Simon (Peter) would not have resisted a divine command to kill and eat both “clean” and “unclean” animals (Acts 10), nor would there have been a debate in the early church as to what extent the gentiles were to observe Mosaic Law (Acts 15).

    When Paul visited the church at Jerusalem, James and the elders told him all its members were “zealous for the Law,” and that they were worried because they heard rumors that Paul was preaching against Mosaic Law (Acts 21).

    None of these events would have happened had Jesus really come to abolish the Law and the prophets!

    Jesus not only repeatedly upheld Mosaic Law, he justified his healing on the Sabbath by referring to commandments calling for the humane treatment of animals!

    While teaching in one of the synagogues on the Sabbath, Jesus healed a woman who had been ill for eighteen years. He justified his healing work on the Sabbath by referring to biblical passages calling for the humane treatment of animals as well as their rest on the Sabbath. “So ought not this woman, being a daughter of Abraham…be loosed from this bond on the Sabbath?” Jesus asked. (Luke 13:10-16)

    On another occasion, Jesus again referred to Torah teaching on “tsa’ar ba’alei chayim” or compassion for animals to justify healing on the Sabbath. “Which of you, having a donkey or an ox that has fallen into a pit, will not immediately pull him out on the Sabbath day?” (Luke 14:1-5)

    Jesus compared saving sinners who had gone astray from God’s kingdom to rescuing lost sheep. He recalled a Jewish legend about Moses’ compassion as a shepherd for his flock:

    “For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. What do you think? Who among you, having a hundred sheep, if he loses one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one which is lost until he finds it?

    “And when he has found it,” Jesus continued, “he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. And when he comes home,he calls together his friends and neighbors saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’

    “I say to you, likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance…there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” (Matthew 18:11-13; Luke 15:3-7,10)

    Paul, on the other hand, said if anyone has confidence in Mosaic Law, “I am ahead of him” (Philippians 3:4-8).

    Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who said he did not come to abolish the Law and the prophets?

    Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who said whoever sets aside even the least of the laws demands shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:17-19)?

    Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who taught that following the commandments of God is the only way to eternal life (Mark 10:17-22)?

    Would that mean Paul places himself ahead of Jesus, who said that it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest portion of the Law to become invalid (Luke 16:17)?

    Paul may have regarded his previous adherence to Mosaic Law as “so much garbage,” but it should be obvious by now that JESUS DIDN’T THINK THE LAW WAS “GARBAGE”!

    If Christians revere Paul’s words over those of Jesus, then “Christianity” really is “Paulianity”.

    Bertrand Russell referred to Paul as the “inventor” of Christianity.

    I’m not saying Christians should all be circumcised and following Mosaic Law. The Reverend Andrew Linzey, the foremost theologian in the field of animal-human relations and author of Christianity and the Rights of Animals (1987), rejected such an approach in a 1989 interview with the Animals’ Agenda.

    I’m merely saying that Christianity for the past 2000 years has been based on a misunderstanding. Christians aren’t really following Jesus. They’re following Paul.

    Pete Cohn of Veggie Jews in San Francisco says Rabbi Michael Lerner, founder of the Network of Spiritual Progressives, focuses on Palestinian issues, not animal rights!

    At the end of 2007, we were distributing copies of Reverend Janet Regina Hyland’s God’s Covenant with Animals (actually, its previous incarnation, The Slaughter of Terrified Beasts, Viatoris Press, 1988) at a San Francisco Vegetarian Society (SFVS) potluck. I offered a copy to Pete Cohn, and he politely declined.

    When I told him People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had called the book a must-read for anyone tired of hearing the Bible misused to justify animal cruelty, Pete said, “PETA’s not Jewish.”

    • Really?!!!!…Who told you all this? or did you paraphrase specific “Bible” phrases to make a point. A point that is not evident. Remember this Organized Religion has been the BANE of civilization in the CIVILIZED world. More people have been killed in the name of some God than for any other reason. Lastly some organized religion has been invented by MAN. It s one more way to have a small select group control a larger one. Enough is enough

  23. Satan is the father of the current Dumbocrap party. He is the king of this world, the prince of the power of the air.
    Suck Fatan.

  24. Tlaib is nothing but trouble and she is a HATER. She got into Congress illegally. She did not live in the district she claimed. That is her fathers address and she does not live there. She is also very Anti-Semantic and participated in terrorist support

  25. There is your proof that it is the democrats that are the real racists and bigots. It is the Democrats is are inciting riots and violence.

  26. Our country operates under the rule of law. The Constitution being the supreme law of the land.

    Talking about lynching or murdering someone is anti-American. Just put them on a boat and sent them back to Iran.

  27. I see some writers here are Marxists based on their response Probably trolling as rhey usual feed from the Deeo Swanp poison. They must hope they will be one of the overseers if the Marxists get their New World Order. It is called Hell!

  28. Plain and simple. The Israelis and Jews are the victims of Islamic terror and white nationalists. They are not the perpetrators!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here